roosnam1980
Member
damn son you are the true skepticPointing out the absurdity of some of this threads "skepticism" isn't "White Knighting." It's literally pointing out the absurdity of some of this threads "skepticism." The two positions on this can not just be "I totally believe her and will protect her oh and can I get a discount on a fart jar" and "Cam girl is just doing it for attention. Go back on Pornhub thot!"
So your argument is that the suggestion that this is a hoax - and thus the husband is fine with being FOREVER labeled a domestic abuser at best, a straight up pimp at worst - is believable because the husband is already okay with his wife creating explicit content through the fantasy of "Amouranth." Really? That makes sense to you?
Except you aren't being a true skeptic. A true skeptic would question what they themselves are willing to accept as true or likely and ask wildly obvious questions of that (such as, if this were a hoax how would this benefit the partner, why the partner "half commits" to the bit in their phone conversation, what would be the point of listing someone under a different name if the goal was to attach them to domestic abuse).
The above is a defensible position and not what I would call a "hoax."
