Phonedog says shitty battery life, CNET says long battery life.
Fight of the early reviews with no details!
So fucking sick of these "gotta be first" mentality sites. No use to anyone.
I'll wait for AnandTech.
Phonedog says shitty battery life, CNET says long battery life.
Fight of the early reviews with no details!
oooh, a special color highlighting the thread starter! that's new, right?
Hmm, so I am in the market for a phone for my wife. Verizon only. And I guess I am conflicted between something like the new Droid Ultra and getting her a Moto X she can customize...
They seem near identical, save for the Ultra's larger screen and off screen buttons, which seems like it will make a significant difference in usable screen real estate. Will the X's other features trickle to the Ultra, like the safe zones and the NFC password stuff?
Phonedog says shitty battery life, CNET says long battery life.
Fight of the early reviews with no details!
Its like Citibank require the device to enable pin lock after you install a Citibank app. Exchange can suck my ass.
I'm really digging the Moto X. I want a berry/white one myself.
What color am I? <3
$680 vs $230
but the app doesn't require a pin lock. remove your work email and set up a hotmail/outlook email with exchange and there's no pin lock requirement. it's your work email server policy that's being enforced.
Its a badly designed security policy, that Android give an app the power to set the password policy. I bet Samsung's new work/personal dual id implementation will fix this issue.
mediocre camera, possibly due to the software.
That sounds about right: solid battery, but nothing special, and mediocre camera, possibly due to the software.
Customization being locked to AT&T is still the worst thing about this launch. What a waste.
My Moto X roller coaster has returned to the optimistic zone.
It's sad, but I am that person at dinner or drinks who's always staring at his phone. And that sort of behavior nets you a 28 percent charge on the Moto X after one day, two hours, 12 minutes and three seconds without battery saver enabled. That result bests even Motorola's own conservative claim of 24-hour battery life. Under the strain of Engadget's formal battery rundown protocol, in which an HD video plays on a loop, the Moto X's 2,200mAh cell lasted 11 hours and 15 minutes. Clap your hands, people. This is the battery life you didn't know you were missing.
The volume rocker and power button, both slivers of painted plastic on the device's right edge, are loosely secured and flimsy. They actually make a slight noise when you jiggle them in their sockets. I don't know about you, but when I plunk down $199 and sign away two years of my life to a carrier, I want to know that the two buttons used most on a phone will be sturdy and everlasting. Which doesn't appear to be the case here.
$300 Google Play Edition, Moto Maker included. BAM. Do it Motoogy.
I really love the Active Display idea. Hoping the next Nexus has it as well as all Moto phones going forward. It's a clear differentiator, and also makes them acutely aware of battery concerns.
It's excellent, but it only works AMOLED screens.
And, a lot of people really, really hate AMOLED screens.
$300 Google Play Edition, Moto Maker included. BAM. Do it Motoogy.
Hmm, so I am in the market for a phone for my wife. Verizon only. And I guess I am conflicted between something like the new Droid Ultra and getting her a Moto X she can customize...
They seem near identical, save for the Ultra's larger screen and off screen buttons, which seems like it will make a significant difference in usable screen real estate. Will the X's other features trickle to the Ultra, like the safe zones and the NFC password stuff?
It's excellent, but it only works AMOLED screens.
And, a lot of people really, really hate AMOLED screens.
Dunno why, they're perfectly fine. The blacks on LCDs stink.
So I'm looking to get a new android phone and was wondering if there's some good suggestions on what to consider. I'm basically looking for something that's slim, sleek, lightweight, with easy to upgrade software, and something near a 4 inch screen size.
For a little more detail, my current phone is a Samsung Infuse 4g. What I enjoy most about this phone is the slimness and lightweight feel that it has. However, the stock software it came with felt unresponsive and caused my phone to crash what felt like every 15 minutes of actual use..I feel I got really unlucky here. Is this a common occurance?
After a couple months I got fed up and spent a night rooting and putting in an unofficial Cyanogenmod which fixed the majority of crash issues and upgraded me to 2.3.7 which I think is Gingerbread. What I remember most about that night is how much of a bother it was to reboot the device multiple times. It's not something I want to do again if I can avoid it, so I miss out on a fair amount of apps because my OS is behind in versions.
My previous smartphones were the iPhone 3G and 4GS, which I sometimes wish I still had since I enjoy that look and feel.
what's "easy to upgrade software"? Fast updates?
On contact pricing removed optimismMy Moto X roller coaster has returned to the optimistic zone.
So as far as the nerds of the phone world are concerned (us all among them, let's call ourselves the 1%, since that's what we are), the gripe about the moto x is boiled down to the fact that the innards of the phone are not as good as competitors phones for the same price. Right? Are there other gripes with it?
I don't have any. Just the price
So if the user experience ends up being better than other phones at the same price, despite 'lacking' hardware, wouldn't that be a good thing? If that's the case, is the price actually out of line, or did it simply not live up to our very hyped expectations (my expectations included)?
So if the user experience ends up being better than other phones at the same price, despite 'lacking' hardware, wouldn't that be a good thing? If that's the case, is the price actually out of line, or did it simply not live up to our very hyped expectations (my expectations included)?
So if the user experience ends up being better than other phones at the same price, despite 'lacking' hardware, wouldn't that be a good thing? If that's the case, is the price actually out of line, or did it simply not live up to our very hyped expectations (my expectations included)?
Or well, updates at all. Currently if I want to update my infuse 4g I have to do it all manually. If I get it within 4 months (is that considered fast?) I'd probably not mind.
Edit: Basically I don't want to hunt down files on the internet and upload them to my phone and any additional steps beyond that.
I'd recommend getting a Nexus straight from Google. No issue of waiting for OS updates.
So if the user experience ends up being better than other phones at the same price, despite 'lacking' hardware, wouldn't that be a good thing? If that's the case, is the price actually out of line, or did it simply not live up to our very hyped expectations (my expectations included)?
I wouldn't be surprised if the N4 dropped in price soon. It's been out for 10 months.