This is not, and will not ever be, anything like "DSLR" results.
Apple are making admirable movement in compact and mobile photography, but they are not yet able to disrupt physics.
Wait, are you guys saying Apple won't have the tech to make it possible to make
movies lit by moonlight?
It's not fair for cameras that can't do full sensor readout fast enough for movies, but for those that can I find videos to be a great way of gauging low light performance because you can't use shutter speeds slower than 1/30 and noise is much harder to hide when it's moving all over the frame. As impressive as those A7s videos are you can still see a lot of softness and noise moving all over the frame as the NR tries to suppress it.
I don't have a big library of shots taken by older cameras, but even 10+ year old digital cameras can take much sharper photos than any iPhone or comparable smartphone in good light. Obviously not counting the very old with less than 6 megapixels, bright hot spots or sensors smaller than APS-C.
Modern smartphones still need to employ a ton of noise reduction, even in daylight photos which kills fine detail. Compare the
iPhone 6s and
Canon 5D (2005 DSLR). In the 6s shot the sky is very noisy, especially the darker clouds. There's still some noise in the 5D sky (top left corner), but it's much, much better. The roof tiles on the 6s show that typical "NR then sharpen" algorithm where some are blurred out and those that weren't are overemphasized and look really out of place. The tiles on the right are almost indistinguishable and look like mush. While there is some detail on the left, if you follow the lines traced by the roof tiles you'll see a bunch of gaps from where the sharpening didn't get enough detail. In the 5D shot the bricks on the bridge just look like bricks.
If you look at the grass in the iPhone it looks like a watercolor painting. Compare that to
this 5D shot where there's actually some detail to it, even in the shadows.