If 820 is really 2x as power efficient and 2x the performance of 810, it's going to be insane.
Reading that the X Style (Pure) is a bit of a dud too
truly, the skip year of skip years
Toss that baby in a ChromecastGonna be a beast for sure. I think 820 samples are what scored that 80k+ on antutu. Now if Android just had games that would take advantage of the power.
Toss that baby in a Chromecast
Sounds like a good idea, I always wanted Chromecasts which burst into flames on use
Quick Charge 3.0 does not seem like it will disappoint us - the manufacturer says the new rendition of its tech charges up to twice as fast as Quick Charge 1.0 and 27% faster than Quick Charge 2.0. What does this mean, exactly? Simply put, you will be able your device's battery level from 0% to 80% in roughly 35 minutes.
Quick Charge 3.0 is also 38% more efficient and "reduces power dissipation by up to 45%" when you pit it against its predecessor. But speedy charging is not the only highlight of Qualcomm's new charging tech. It's also the first technology of its kind that supports INOV (Intelligent Negotiation for Optimum Voltage), allowing the device equipped with it to determine the exact power level to draw for optimal power transfer to the battery. The voltage steps of said adjustments are vastly superior to the ones of Quick Charge 2.0 - while the latter can charge your phone at either 5V, 9V, 12V, or 20V, Quick Charge 3.0 allows for incremental 200mV steps between 3.6V and 20V, paving the way for more flexibility.
Quick Charge 3.0 will be backwards compatible with its previous versions and different charging connectors, most notably USB Type-C. The nifty new version of the charging tech will first appear on a whole squad of Snapdragon chipsets, like the upcoming 820, 620, 618, 617, and 430.
New tabs as apps is so much better. Going back is primitive.Old, but anyone leave on the default Chrome setting where tabs open as new apps? Maybe I'm just not used to it, but man, what a terrible idea.
What's Smart Wifi Calling?
For starters, the X12 LTE modem is designed to choose automatically between LTE and Wi-Fi, depending on signal quality, end-to-end speed, and Internet reachability. (Again, consult the “Appendix for Nerds” at the end if you want to know how it all works).
These smarts to choose between LTE and Wi-Fi really come in handy with Wi-Fi calling. Where the X10 LTE in Snapdragon 810 checked only for Wi-Fi signal strength before switching, the X12 LTE is engineered to first check all the factors listed above, to make sure that you’ll have a clear, high quality call over Wi-Fi. And if things deteriorate (for example, if congestion reduces speed on a public Wi-Fi hotspot), it’s engineered to switch your call back to the safety of LTE—all without dropping the call. Brilliant.
Er, Snapdragon 430 and 617 were just announced
http://m.androidcentral.com/qualcom...17-processors?utm_source=ac&utm_medium=dlvrit
617 end of 2015. Small chance at new nexus's?
Well I've lasted two years with this S4, so I'll push it to a third.
No chance. The Nexus phones are probably already packaged and ready to be shipped, if the end of September release is legit.
Also, the 820 does sound great, especially the quick charge. Of course, by the time it hits most devices, we will be fapping over the 830.
Alright, looks like next year will be a great year. Quick charge. It'll be a couple more years minimum until Android catches up to 3D Touch. No, Huawei isn't even close to Apple's implementation.
I still don't see the difference between a long press and a force touch.
Alright, looks like next year will be a great year. Quick charge. It'll be a couple more years minimum until Android catches up to 3D Touch. No, Huawei isn't even close to Apple's implementation.
There's multiple layers. Pressing it through one layer does one thing and pressing it harder does another thing. A long press is amateur hour in comparison when looking at the tech and implementation.
Not only does the software implementation look far better, but the hardware to implement haptics via the taptic engine actually seems competent. And long presses suck because you're forced to wait. This is instant.I still don't see the difference between a long press and a force touch.
No, I understand how it works. That's clear to me. But none of the demos I've seen couldn't have been done with a long press + holding. I really don't see how applying pressure to the screen is "so much more direct and natural" and makes using the phone "better than ever".
No, I understand how it works. That's clear to me. But none of the demos I've seen couldn't have been done with a long press + holding. I really don't see how applying pressure to the screen is "so much more direct and natural" and makes using the phone "better than ever".
And third/middle click. I'm handicapped on a computer without three mouse buttons.Certainly I can't be help look puzzled at the excitement at what looks like right clicking on a phone.
Alright, looks like next year will be a great year. Quick charge. It'll be a couple more years minimum until Android catches up to 3D Touch. No, Huawei isn't even close to Apple's implementation.
the only way android can stop playing catch-up with apple is if OEMs skin and bring innovative features to an otherwise "shy" OS.
S7 might offer it next year in a more refined way though, which can be worrisome because it'll be a touchwiz overlay, which like many others I've never found attractive, but again it's a step in the right direction. Stock Android has its limits.
So yeah, I agree with you for once. Two years seems like the amount of time it'll take for stock android phones to land with decent force touch interactions and good hardware. It's also a good motivation to look at non-stock devices for once.
And third/middle click. I'm handicapped on a computer without three mouse buttons.
Tim Culpan Verified account
‏@tculpan
Price Target Zero
Berenberg cuts its valuation on HTC shares to NT$0.00. It's lost its scale and no interesting assets, analysts say
I don't think you watched enough of the demos. One example off the top of my head was the quick peak into an app/email/text on the soft touch and then hard touching will actually open the app if you decide to do so.No, I understand how it works. That's clear to me. But none of the demos I've seen couldn't have been done with a long press + holding. I really don't see how applying pressure to the screen is "so much more direct and natural" and makes using the phone "better than ever".
it's ok...they have a hero phone coming soon.
Lol, wut?
iOS was already falling behind 'stock Android' and 3D Touch is Apple's attempt to bring it back to par.
I don't care for Touchwiz at all but Samsung did all Airview two years ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXIyYni4_-M
that's the same quick peak UI everybody was calling a gimmick that is now being wanked over because Apple is offering it in iOS9.
I'll hold judgement until I play with an iPhone 6s myself to see if Apple nails the UX but goddam it's embarrassing to see supposed smartphone experts that don't know the UI innovations that's been available on Android for a long while now.
I don't think you watched enough of the demos. One example off the top of my head was the quick peak into an app/email/text on the soft touch and then hard touching will actually open the app if you decide to do so.
There are lots more examples of why having multiple layers is a lot more seamless/better of an implementation.
Can't say I ever use three buttons. I use the wheel, but that's about it.
Offering it way better designed and integrated in the UI. Apple may come last (lol really), but they usually nail it. This is one of those cases.
multi-touch is kind of gimmicky
Frankly, since Forstall was forced out, Apple has been flopping on UI.
lol wut? You have an iPhone 6s already? I haveforce3D touch on my Apple watch. It sucks, no better than a long press. But 3D touch UI is different on the phone so I'll wait to judge for myself. Frankly, since Forstall was forced out, Apple has been flopping on UI. I waited patiently for Apple to do third party keyboards, multitasking, a watch etc and get it right but their implementations are just not as good as the competition.
The main reason I'm keep going back to the Apple ecosystem is for OSX. I've tried the Surface Pro and the Chromebook Pixel but the Macbook still has the edge (primarily because of all the talented app developers). Now that iOS is catching up to Android, I can come back to the iPhone which has a simplified integration with my Macbook
It's just weird to see people wanking over 3DTouch as though it's some great leap forward. Hardware is worthless until it's been utilized by software and all the stuff Apple is using 3DTouch for have already been done on other platforms or aren't necessary:
"Woohoo you can 3DTouch an app icon on the iOS homescreen for quick actions. Such innovation, amazing leap forward"
"Oh Android had widgets and Windows Phone had Live icons since inception? Nevermind"
Having a widget for quick actions for each app instead of just having it built into the app itself would suck dude. Implementation matters.lol wut? You have an iPhone 6s already? I haveforce3D touch on my Apple watch. It sucks, no better than a long press. But 3D touch UI is different on the phone so I'll wait to judge for myself. Frankly, since Forstall was forced out, Apple has been flopping on UI. I waited patiently for Apple to do third party keyboards, multitasking, a watch etc and get it right but their implementations are just not as good as the competition.
The main reason I'm keep going back to the Apple ecosystem is for OSX. I've tried the Surface Pro and the Chromebook Pixel but the Macbook still has the edge (primarily because of all the talented app developers). Now that iOS is catching up to Android, I can come back to the iPhone which has a simplified integration with my Macbook
It's just weird to see people wanking over 3DTouch as though it's some great leap forward. Hardware is worthless until it's been utilized by software and all the stuff Apple is using 3DTouch for have already been done on other platforms or aren't necessary:
"Woohoo you can 3DTouch an app icon on the iOS homescreen for quick actions. Such innovation, amazing leap forward"
"Oh Android had widgets and Windows Phone had Live icons since inception? Nevermind"
Having a widget for quick actions for each app instead of just having it built into the app itself would suck dude. Implementation matters.
And I'm confused about windows phone. Do live tiles have quick actions?
I think what they showed with 3D touch is bollocks, at least to me. I have no need to peek at things if I'm not going to open them, but I suppose if you get work emails and the like, you might.
Someone mentioned opening things in new tabs earlier. If that's easy to do, I may change my mind.
They showed more than peeking. The parts I'm more excited for are the app shortcuts (jump straight to selfie mode in camera, jump straight to composing email, straight to voicemail on phone, etc).
What's the rumored price of the Nexus 5 2015? And do the Nexus phones usually sell in Canada at the same time as US?
I have a HTC ONE M7 and my god something has totally slowed down this phone to a crawl. There's a new service pack out from HTC this morning but I think it's time to upgrade, it's been 2 years I have this phone - mostly been great to me.