BoboBrazil
Member
It's better than that black bar at the top of the Huawei.
That black bar is probably not on the final design I assume. I'd imagine it would be the same color as the rest of the phone.
It's better than that black bar at the top of the Huawei.
Hopefully that's the case. Guess we'll find out soon enough.That black bar is probably not on the final design I assume. I'd imagine it would be the same color as the rest of the phone.
Hopefully that's the case. Guess we'll find out soon enough.
Yeah, that's quite hideous. What the hell.New Chromecast leaked: http://9to5google.com/2015/09/17/ex...-w-backdrop-feeds-better-wifi-fast-play-more/
will buy 3 again
Nope, it did change to processing though.Yep, little less than 2 weeks left. Did your OP2 ship? Mine shipped today directly from China instead of California like usual.
New Chromecast leaked: http://9to5google.com/2015/09/17/ex...-w-backdrop-feeds-better-wifi-fast-play-more/
will buy 3 again
Nope, it did change to processing though.
That'd be nice. We'll see, if not they do say delivery within 6-10 days so the latest by that is next Thursday. That's what my email from them said anyway, like I said we'll see.Will probably ship tonight or tomorrow then. It seems some people are getting theirs from China and some from California, so yours might be from California.
Hell yes, finally.New Chromecast leaked: http://9to5google.com/2015/09/17/ex...-w-backdrop-feeds-better-wifi-fast-play-more/
will buy 3 again
Then it'd just be like every other set top box. Using a phone or tablet to control it is one of the best things about Chromecast. No need to mess with a tv interface.Are they seriously not going to include a remote and turn it into a mini android tv stick? Come on. Having to use your phone is the worst part of the chromecast.
Do you know how cumbersome it is to open the app every time you want to pause or skip/rewind? It sucks. It needs voice search too.Hell yes, finally.
Then it'd just be like every other set top box. Using a phone or tablet to control it is one of the best things about Chromecast. No need to mess with a tv interface.
Are they seriously not going to include a remote and turn it into a mini android tv stick? Come on. Having to use your phone is the worst part of the chromecast.
Once you cast something, you get a notification with those controls, so you can simply turn the screen on and play/pause/whatever from the lock screen. And if you decide you want to watch out listen to something else, it's singingly easier and quicker to type/search on a mobile device than with a remote. The whole point of Chromecast is speed and simplicity.Do you know how cumbersome it is to open the app every time you want to pause or skip/rewind? It sucks. It needs voice search too.
No NFC for Android Pay though lol
That's still not as fast as a dedicated remote. There's no unlocking involved and the controls are actually tactile, so you're not forced to look at the phone screen. And while typing is faster on your phone, it's not as fast as using your voice with a remote.Once you cast something, you get a notification with those controls, so you can simply turn the screen on and play/pause/whatever from the lock screen. And if you decide you want to watch out listen to something else, it's singingly easier and quicker to type/search on a mobile device than with a remote. The whole point of Chromecast is speed and simplicity.
Do you know how cumbersome it is to open the app every time you want to pause or skip/rewind? It sucks. It needs voice search too.
That's still not as fast as a dedicated remote. There's no unlocking involved and the controls are actually tactile, so you're not forced to look at the phone screen. And while typing is faster on your phone, it's not as fast as using your voice with a remote.
I agree, voice search would be nice, and indeed faster in some instances, but honestly, the whole remote thing just isn't what Chromecast is about. What you're wanting/describing is essentially Android TV. It does everything the Chromecast does, but with a more fleshed out, 'smart tv' feature set and experience.That's still not as fast as a dedicated remote. There's no unlocking involved and the controls are actually tactile, so you're not forced to look at the phone screen. And while typing is faster on your phone, it's not as fast as using your voice with a remote.
So I just set up 2-step authentication on my Microsoft Account...hot damn, the way it works is so nice. You get an actionable push notification to approve/disapprove. Seems like it can fall back to a code as well, so there doesn't seem to be a downside.
Really slick implementation.
I agree, voice search would be nice, and indeed faster in some instances, but honestly, the whole remote thing just isn't what Chromecast is about. What you're wanting/describing is essentially Android TV. It does everything the Chromecast does, but with a more fleshed out, 'smart tv' feature set and experience.
Yeah, it's really nice. I just set it up and installed the appa couple of weeks ago when I made a new Xbox Live account. It's definitely a better implementation than Google's.So I just set up 2-step authentication on my Microsoft Account...hot damn, the way it works is so nice. You get an actionable push notification to approve/disapprove. Seems like it can fall back to a code as well, so there doesn't seem to be a downside.
Really slick implementation.
No local media streaming is my biggest gripe with Chromecast. I use a third party app to do it currently, but I'd prefer if Google added support for that themselves. I'd also like to be able to cast directly to the Chromecast without the need for an actual connection to a the internet or a router. Something like WiFi direct. Streaming local media seems to still eat into my data cap at home.yup, sometimes i also wish chromecast was able to do some extra things, but there are a number of android tv/sticks that do that for cheap.
The only thing i would add to Chromecast would be ability to stream from local media (and support more codecs) that would make it almost perfect , not a problem at home but if you are without internet (trip) , and also wouldn't need to run a media server like Plex.
Even though this nexus 6 with fingerprint scanner is probably a prototype it does give a glimpse of how it will be in the 2016 moto x phone(S).
That's still not as fast as a dedicated remote. There's no unlocking involved and the controls are actually tactile, so you're not forced to look at the phone screen. And while typing is faster on your phone, it's not as fast as using your voice with a remote.
That's the only OEM I can support placing the fingerprint sensor in the bad because it actually makes a little sense.
Btw, sell me on the chromecast guys. I know nothing about it. Does it have an app store? Can I watch twitch on tv or only with that air play thing?
I agree with him.You should have a chat with Bboy AJ, the guy who thinks that IR is obsolete and nothing should use it anymore
Exactly. I want a fire tv stick competitor because whenever friends or family ask what cheap stick they should get, I almost always know they would prefer a remote with voice capabilities too.I agree, voice search would be nice, and indeed faster in some instances, but honestly, the whole remote thing just isn't what Chromecast is about. What you're wanting/describing is essentially Android TV. It does everything the Chromecast does, but with a more fleshed out, 'smart tv' feature set and experience.
You are odd. I have both too, and their remotes always stay in one place--the coffee table. My phone on the other hand could be anywhere, like my office or kitchen.It's much faster than a dedicated remote, because 99% of the time I would have no idea where the remote is, whereas I always, always know where my phone is (in my arse pocket).
I have an Amazon Fire TV and a Chromecast, and I use the Chromecast way more often because I don't need to find the remote.
You are odd. I have both too, and their remotes always stay in one place--the coffee table. My phone on the other hand could be anywhere, like my office or kitchen.
You said Android Wear...
You're weird dude.No, YOU'RE ODD.
Seriously though, people in my house have a habit of letting remotes slide down the sofa. My phone is always with me though,
You're weird dude.
It's a half a century old technology. It needs to end. Like aux cables.You should have a chat with Bboy AJ, the guy who thinks that IR is obsolete and nothing should use it anymore
You don't install any apps on it. It's a device for pushing content from your tablet, mobile or PC to the TV, but it's not a mirror (except for a clunky fallback). The Netflix, or YouTube, or somesuch phone app tells the Chromecast your authentication and what you're trying to watch and the device gets the stream directly itself. And then the relevant app gives you remote control, including through an actionable notification.
It's a half a century old technology. It needs to end. Like aux cables.
It's a half a century old technology. It needs to end. Like aux cables.
As someone who can't stand in-ear plugs, the only way to make Bluetooth acceptable is this:
And even then I'd only get it for the remote buttons.
As someone who can't stand in-ear plugs, the only way to make Bluetooth acceptable is this:
And even then I'd only get it for the remote buttons.
what model are these?
If you're actually claiming that Stagefright will result in a universal root, well I'll believe it when I see it. It is extremely hard to exploit Stagefright in a consistent manner because of how Android sandboxing and memory address obfuscation works. That's why there still isn't any Android Security Apocalypse going on right now even though nearly a billion devices worldwide are vulnerable.
New Chromecast leaked: http://9to5google.com/2015/09/17/ex...-w-backdrop-feeds-better-wifi-fast-play-more/
will buy 3 again
Not sure if this is the right thread to ask.
I was looking at android tablets, and in particular at the 8" Galaxy Tab S, and i'm losing my mind over how many (seemingly all called the same, T700 for WiFi only) version there, all with wildly different prices, i've seen from 269€ to over 400€.
I assume some are older versions, but i can't find a clear way to distinguish them.
Only thing is, some seem to have a small speaker at the very top, and some don't.
Speaker.
No speaker.
Assuming that's even a speaker, actually.
I'm sure i'm missing something very obvious here.
That's the only OEM I can support placing the fingerprint sensor on the back because it actually makes a little sense.
Btw, sell me on the chromecast guys. I know nothing about it. Does it have an app store? Can I watch twitch on tv or only with that air play thing?
You don't think LG having a back fingerprint sensor would make sense?
pic with the earpiece on top is of the LTE version. notice it also has the proximity sensor.
As someone who can't stand in-ear plugs, the only way to make Bluetooth acceptable is this:
And even then I'd only get it for the remote buttons.
I don't get the difference between this and something like Jaybird Bluebuds.
I don't get the difference between this and something like Jaybird Bluebuds.