Here's a quote from your googled study. "These brain differences dont mean that young people cant make good decisions or tell the difference between right and wrong. It also doesnt mean that they shouldnt be held responsible for their actions. But an awareness of these differences can help parents, teachers, advocates, and policy makers understand, anticipate, and manage the behavior of adolescents."
Sorry, does not say anything about 15 year olds not being rational to the point of not having personal responsibility.
So, we are back to square one where it's basically you telling us something is a fact while it's not.
And yeah, i made no claims about the issue.
You don't have to make outright claims to your opinion when they're implicitly stated. You obviously feel like the 15-year old knew what they were doing. You referred to it in rational vs. legal terms after all. The 'fact' you take umbrage with is that I I think a 15-year old isn't capable of making that decision. Like every 15 year old would make that decision. The issue is that the teacher is taking advantage of him through a position of power and age.
I have to assume the age of consent is lower in your country which is why you're so defensive about it. If that's true than we can go back to the culturally advanced argument.
Or not. I also think you just like to babble your opinions as universal truth, so let's just hug it out.