David H Wong
Banned
Where is your proof? You're likely citing the fake news article that has been thoroughly debunked. The anamolies lineup with demographics as Nate silver and just about every other major pundits has already pointed out.
The cobfirmation bias and hypocrisy surrounding this whole thing is nauseating.
Edit- unless of course Nate silver is in Trump's camp? Right? We're essentially spewing baseless speculation as facts here so why not.
The Fake News on the left is now every bit as bad as the right. I thought we were supposed to be the educated ones? Where is the fact-checking? Are there people in this thread who still think there's some kind of evidence of Russian vote machine hacking, or that such a thing would even be possible? Hint: The machines aren't networked.
There are no anomalies, guys. Trump just ... won the election. I'm sorry. He did. Lots of people either really liked him or really hated Hillary.
"But the electoral college!"
If you want to change the EC, change it for next time. But you don't change the rules after people have voted. If this had been a popular vote contest all along, both candidates would have run completely different campaigns. Ad spends, appearances, platforms, even the locations of the conventions were based around EC impact. We have no idea if Trump could have won a popular vote race - he wasn't trying to. It's like coming back after the Super Bowl is over and deciding to award the game to the team with the most yards instead of points. If they'd known that was the criteria, they'd have run different plays.