Well, at $399 the launch 360 came with a headset, a media remote control, and HDTV cables.
PSP < ? < Vita < Wii < ? < 3DS < 150k < PS3 < 200k < 360
I believe you guys could figure out what is '?' stand for.
$1 price tags across the board are no more the solution than $60 price tags across the board. downloadable titles on all systems are blurring these lines. you don't see PSN, XBLA, 3DS store etc etc sales in these NPD figures yet, but the 3DS has it's fantastic $5 titles too. the Vita will get them too even if it hasn't already.It does when the steakhouse's business plan relied on the sales volume of the fast food place.
You think the new service focused Microsoft is going to be that generous on the next Xbox?
Is this true?
It seems.. rather unhealthy.
Notice the title of the chart "2007-2008 Video Game Industry Revenue Growth." Wasn't the PSP already pretty much dead/stagnating in the US in 2007? In any case, I don't think it was experiencing growth anymore by that point.Does that chart work if you assume Wii is this gen's leading console, replacing the PS2, or is it based on 360/PS3 being this gen's PS2?
Nintendo definitely wasn't responsible for all of the handheld growth, since they had 100% of the market the generation before.
If you subtract GBA sales last gen from DS sales this generation, PSP was responsible for at least 40% of the total handheld market growth this generation (worldwide. Less in the US). Nintendo went from a 100% share last generation to a 70% share this generation while doubling their hardware and software sales over the GBA. Handheld growth this generation was nuts.
No clue. They are service focused on the 360 because the generation is over and there will be no more games made so they have to do something to keep it selling after the new system comes out.
Yep and games like Plants vs Zombies and Angry Birds are selling great on the mobile platform that more people seem to be choosing.
The most surprising thing to me is the 3DS. It's shocking to see it still kind of struggling.
I'm curious if Mario Kart/3D Land are bubbling in the 11-20 range like so many DS games did or not.
It's not unhackable. It's just not worth hacking.
iOS/Android is making $40 portable games a non-starter for many. Why spend $40 on a hh game when you can get a $1-$5 game that gives you just as much enjoyment?
Or because there's more money in services than games. Xbox has always been about getting MS in the living room, but you need more than software to fo that these days.
The most surprising thing to me is the 3DS. It's shocking to see it still kind of struggling.
I'm curious if Mario Kart/3D Land are bubbling in the 11-20 range like so many DS games did or not.
No DS?
I wonder if the 1.2M copies of Diablo 3 that Blizzard is giving away to their WoW annual pass subscribers worldwide will hurt first month sales for the game. If about half of those were from North America, that's 500-600k copies of Diablo 3 that won't be on the May NPD results. What did Starcraft 2 sell first month in the US?
PSP < ? < Vita < Wii < ? < 3DS < 150k < PS3 < 200k < 360
I believe you guys could figure out what is '?' stand for.
Sorry, DS seems better than Vita.
Sorry, DS seems better than Vita.
Sorry, DS seems better than Vita.
The most surprising thing to me is the 3DS. It's shocking to see it still kind of struggling.
I'm curious if Mario Kart/3D Land are bubbling in the 11-20 range like so many DS games did or not.
Sorry, DS seems better than Vita.
Sorry, DS seems better than Vita.
Sorry, DS seems better than Vita.
Does that chart work if you assume Wii is this gen's leading console, replacing the PS2, or is it based on 360/PS3 being this gen's PS2?
Nintendo definitely wasn't responsible for all of the handheld growth, since they had 100% of the market the generation before.
If you subtract GBA sales last gen from DS sales this generation, PSP was responsible for at least 40% of the total handheld market growth this generation (worldwide. Less in the US). Nintendo went from a 100% share last generation to a 70% share this generation while doubling their hardware and software sales over the GBA. Handheld growth this generation was nuts.
PSP < ? < Vita < Wii < ? < 3DS < 150k < PS3 < 200k < 360
I believe you guys could figure out what is '?' stand for.
Or because there's more money in services than games. Xbox has always been about getting MS in the living room, but you need more than software to fo that these days.
Can't wait to hear about the PlayStation Ecosystem and its momentum!
Vita numbers are bad but I'm more stunned at the 3DS numbers. I'd figure it'd have a larger percentage of that shrinking handheld pie given all the advantages it has over the Vita.
Sony and Nintendo have a huge uphill battle in the west when it comes to handhelds.
Apple is taking a massive chunk of the market Nintendo used to dominate with the DS.
Nintendo will continue to do well in Japan, but the 3DS will probably continue to struggle regardless of how good the software is. People have just moved on to ipads and smartphones to get that sort of fix.
Nintendo and Sony will need to embrace the mobile phone market or they will continue to languish with their handhelds.
Sony should just back Nintendo's handheld with games, this way they could advertise there console offering.
Wow at a Kinect only game at #2.
Funny how there was a whole thread just before the games release where we were all mocking it.
It doesn't have the software to justify selling more than that, not yet anyway.
my guess is that it is calculating growth for each individual company. I wonder how it would look with the mobile market included .Does that chart work if you assume Wii is this gen's leading console, replacing the PS2, or is it based on 360/PS3 being this gen's PS2?
Nintendo definitely wasn't responsible for all of the handheld growth, since they had 100% of the market the generation before.
If you subtract GBA sales last gen from DS sales this generation, PSP was responsible for at least 40% ofp the total handheld market growth this Vitamins (worldwide. Less in the US). Nintendo went from a 100% share last generation to a 70% share this generation while doubling their hardware and software sales over the GBA. Handheld growth this generation was nuts.
iOS/Android is making $40 portable games a non-starter for many. Why spend $40 on a hh game when you can get a $1-$5 game that gives you just as much enjoyment?
Pokemon on 3ds in 2013, will do the trick. The glorious millions. Pokemon should be a title that releases with a console, alongside with Mario.
Yeah, the 3DS and PSV doing bad is definitely telling. 3DS moreso. After the huge push that Nintendo did last year, the platform still isn't doing extremely well. Better than the PSV, of course, but the western sales haven't been doing as well as it's doing in Japan. I guess the way handhelds are viewed in the west isn't really helping the situation.
PSP < ? < Vita < Wii < ? < 3DS < 150k < PS3 < 200k < 360
I believe you guys could figure out what is '?' stand for.
Sorry, DS seems better than Vita.
Pokemon on 3ds in 2013, will do the trick. The glorious millions. Pokemon should be a title that releases with a console, alongside with Mario.
The shrinking handheld market won't be able to accommodate two pieces of expensive hardware this round. Vita won't be making any recovery, which is a shame given how impressive the hardware is. Software weaknesses as a multipurpose device were enough to kill it for me though, as I'm sure is the case for many others. I have no doubt that the rise of ubiquitous mobile internet access and powerful, multipurpose smartphones has pulled Vita's target demographic from under it, namely affluent 16-25 year old males. Nobody wants to throw hundreds of dollars at an ungainly device good for nothing but games anymore, especially when they're already carrying something that can provide limitless quick entertainment through games, web browsing, Facebook etc.
3DS numbers depend as much on whether DS saturation precludes parents buying their kids new devices.