They should have had Jesse Eisenberg just play George Michael whenever Cera was unavailable and not bring any attention to it. I feel like AD could get away with that.
my brain would snap if this happened.
They should have had Jesse Eisenberg just play George Michael whenever Cera was unavailable and not bring any attention to it. I feel like AD could get away with that.
Such a fantastic joke...
All the way to the zebra print.
She did look much better with the shorter hair.
She did look much better with the shorter hair.It gets better once she has her haircut, I was able to get past her new face then and move on.
They were completely unnecessary, especially since we had seen young George and Lucille in past seasons already. Guest stars for guest stars sake.
Did GMimpregnate her?
Running joke the Bluths knock up women.Did GMimpregnate her?
Did GMimpregnate her?
Yep. Wiig could have been a good Lucille but lacked the shrill nastiness that Jessica Walter has down to a science.I felt it detracted from this season. I never laughed once during those scenes.
Seth's portrayal of George was terrible.
I fucking exploded with laughter. Man I miss Curb.
Did anybody else not like the way they kept expanding on scenes by adding in lines that didn't happen the first time? I dunno if that was supposed to be a joke, but I think it took away from making it fit cleanly together. For example the most vivid one I can remember is of GOB talking about how he would make fun of Michael, for example if he was dating a man - then the one later on goes into crazy detail with the masks and stuff, which was obviously never said the first time.
I guess that one was kind of funny, but it's hard to look back and go wow at how things fit together when they retconned scenes later on to make it fit. They did it often, and I think it would have been funnier if they did it by cutting away before the extra lines, or having Ron Howard talk over the lines, or just having the lines there in a clever way so that they don't make sense until the context is there.
I dunno I just didn't get what they were going for with that, maybe the unreliable scene-showing was supposed to be a joke.
Actual spoiler...
So uh, that's the ending? I thought it was working up to this big thing, only to end with a whimper. George Michael suddenly punches his dad? That's it? Really?
Mike Hale said:You need to have watched them to comprehend Season 4 to understand much of its humor or to make sense of its convoluted plot but if you truly loved them, its hard to imagine being anything but disappointed with this new rendition.
Wow, I didn't expect the most juvenile and hyperbolic review to come from the New York Times:
Translation: If you're a true AD fan, you'll hate Season 4.
What an ass.
Actual spoiler...
So uh, that's the ending? I thought it was working up to this big thing, only to end with a whimper. George Michael suddenly punches his dad? That's it? Really?
Seriously what's up with those facebook chat noises
I will say the plot was convoluted. I liked a lot of it, but I was kind of confused at times trying to remember what time things happened and if something had already happened.
Yeah, it was definitely complicated, but I think it will become easier to appreciate upon multiple viewings. It's like peeling back the layers of an onion.
I've always expected a divided reaction, but in true AD fashion, I'm confident it will get better with age.
Wow, I didn't expect the most juvenile and hyperbolic review to come from the New York Times:
Translation: If you're a true AD fan, you'll hate Season 4.
What an ass.
I will say the plot was convoluted. I liked a lot of it, but I was kind of confused at times trying to remember what time things happened and if something had already happened.
Sounds fair to me.
I'm baffled by anybody who isn't intensely disappointed.
The time jumps confused me for a few episodes. Towards the end I got a good handle on it, and I am sure on re-watches it wont be a problem.
got to say i found the ending pretty abrupt and weak ..... we getting a season 5 ?
Sounds fair to me.
I'm baffled by anybody who isn't intensely disappointed.
I'm baffled by anybody who isn't intensely happy with it.Sounds fair to me.
I'm baffled by anybody who isn't intensely disappointed.
You keep saying the same thing in this thread, we get it.
It's not the 4th episode that finally brings the laugh ( there are plenty of great scenes in the first three), its the fourth that starts putting the pieces together and being less abstract with the story.I just don't see how AD fans are okay with having to wait until the 4th episode for any real laugh and still call this good.
Sounds fair to me.
I'm baffled by anybody who isn't intensely disappointed.
Seth Rogen sucks in everything. Luckily he wasn't in it enough to be much of a problem.
Sounds fair to me.
I'm baffled by anybody who isn't intensely disappointed.
This isn't a circle jerk, I can say whatever I like.
Why not trying to say more?This isn't a circle jerk, I can say whatever I like.
After episode 1 and 2 I wanted to cry. There are some fantastic moments in the season for me, though. Some really clever stuff. The audio gags get me every time and I love how they brought back "Mr. F" and the "coincidence" stuff was a good new joke.
Speaking of that, what are all the new recurring jokes? Some stuff I can think of: "Hot mess", coincidence music, Sound of Silence. What else?
It's one thing to disagree about the quality of the season.
It's another thing to suggest that everyone who likes this season is either lying or delusional, as you seem to be doing.
This isn't a circle jerk, I can say whatever I like.
The cult behind that isn't nearly as big or popular as AD.They should pick up the rights to make Firefly.