OdysseusVA
Banned
Did they change his face again?
So I played AC 1 & 2, but never played Brotherhood or Revelations. Do I need to get and finish those to have a clue what is going on in III?
No, because they were man made constructions. Maybe you don't think it's different but it's totally different to me.
It bothers me that something as awesome as a Mayan tomb is a retailer-specific bonus. I hope it's included with the PC DDE.
GamersGate said:
Just relinking this blog post regarding accents:
http://www.nicholasjohnpatrick.com/post/767354896/did-americans-in-1776-have-british-accents
Essentially,It confirms that Lucy was a Templar double agent all along. Vidic knew all along about Lucy's private conversations with Desmond during AC1, and Abstergo arranged Desmond's escape.
People run on buildings and planks. People don't run and jump from branch to branch.More people climb trees then they climb buildings.
Single player characters? What does that mean exactly?Remembering that the PC DDE is available to pre-order everywhere but Steam, I decided to look into this:
Fantastic.
Hm, interesting. But beyond accents, the main thing is that some of the voices just do not seem to be very well executed and do not fit the characters. Take the Indian here at 2:47 for example. The voice acting is just not very well done at all and hardly fits this Indian warrior who is Connor's mentor. He sounds like some kid.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blQtMlLwUN4
But despite that and the lame mini games, I think the game is still going to be amazing. It is just one of the weaker aspects of the game that I have seen so far.
That is not Connor's Mentor....
Single player characters? What does that mean exactly?
Then why did the developer say it was just before the scene? Or was he referring to someone else? Either way, the voice acting for the Indian guy is still pretty bad.
The old guy in the background walking out of the door is his mentor.
I have both consoles and have been sitting on the fence about which port of AC3 to pick up...
AC1,2, and Brotherhood were superior on 360. Revelations seemed to have somewhat of an edge on PS3. AC3 seems to be a little more Sony-centric with content and the fact that Ubi used PS3 footage to reveal AC3 at E3. Tough choice. If PS3 does have the edge then I might use that as the case to finally pick up a new PS3 via the 500GB bundle.
ooold.
That was awful.
Where are the amazing CG trailers we are used to seeing for AC?
That was awful.
Where are the amazing CG trailers we are used to seeing for AC?
Still no reveal of the tomb locations they did in previous games.
Also am I the only person who thinks this setting is stupid? Running in trees is Naruto level shit and I feel like the series has taken a nosedive.
Also am I the only person who thinks this setting is stupid? Running in trees is Naruto level shit and I feel like the series has taken a nosedive.
Tree leaves and fire effects kinda look bad...
For teams of 500 people, they need to get better animators. My dad is a 59 year old non-gamer and remarked at the TV trailer: "it looks good but the animation is so muddy". After watching it again in more depth, I have to agree. If there's anything to give away that something is a game, it's the way it moves.
So you're comparing the animation to life, not other games? That doesn't seem fair.For teams of 500 people, they need to get better animators. My dad is a 59 year old non-gamer and remarked at the TV trailer: "it looks good but the animation is so muddy". After watching it again in more depth, I have to agree. If there's anything to give away that something is a game, it's the way it moves.
For teams of 500 people, they need to get better animators. My dad is a 59 year old non-gamer and remarked at the TV trailer: "it looks good but the animation is so muddy". After watching it again in more depth, I have to agree. If there's anything to give away that something is a game, it's the way it moves.
For teams of 500 people, they need to get better animators. My dad is a 59 year old non-gamer and remarked at the TV trailer: "it looks good but the animation is so muddy". After watching it again in more depth, I have to agree. If there's anything to give away that something is a game, it's the way it moves.
So you're comparing the animation to life, not other games? That doesn't seem fair.
What does that mean? He can't see that animation?
*Looks at animation debate*It Begins.
Hitman. Sneak in, sneak out.
Then again AC isn't about sneaking that much anymore, just sneaking more transparently I suppose.
That was terrible, what the hell.
Seriously WTF?!?!
So at end of brotherhood,The 'old one' (Minerva?) made desmond kill her because they know she was bad? BullShit! They made it sound like they expect Desmond to continue his lineage, but with another woman and not her. RANT TIME Maybe in the end I just care too mcuh about the story of video games but after AC2 I was really interested. After that they just really went all of the place. Oddly enough the main creative director left after 2. I think the worst part is that all Brotherhood and Revelations did was re-iterate what we knew for two more games. In AC2 they told you but was subtle. Way to fuck a major plot point in the DLC. I kind of hope they never adddress it and people bitch, not knowing what happened.