Lokaum D+
Member
Yep, he lost his credibility to a lot of ppl, included me,This guy said Dragon Age Veilguard was his game of the year....
Yep, he lost his credibility to a lot of ppl, included me,This guy said Dragon Age Veilguard was his game of the year....
Still better than Odyssey and Origins ;d
Because most normal people don’t care about the skin color of the main character.None of the reviews I've watched mentions the anacronistic protagonist choice.
I'm not sure how immersive mode is immersive to be honest. For me it'd break immersion if one side spoke japanese and the other understood and responded in portuguese. Better to just use the japanese dub in general but that's just me.Imagine playing this game in engrish. Immersive mode is for the real gamer.
Because most normal people don’t care about the skin color of the main character.
None of the reviews I've watched mentions the anacronistic protagonist choice. I had no faith in them being critical about It but they are so petrified they wont event defend It or makes any kind of comment.
Does anyone else really just not care that "playing as Yasuke doesn't feel like an Assassin's Creed game?" You have a whole other character to capture those feelings if you wish and the game does not railroad you into playing as one or the other. The series is approaching nearly 20 years old, at this point it needs to be radically altering the formula beyond just offering "the same, but now open world".
I liked Origins because Bayek's story was awesome, seeing how the brotherhood was born gave me an ear to ear smile.![]()
Just like any Ubisoft series, the design is slightly iterated on until it is run into the ground. It's probably why people liked Origins so much as it was a departure from the norm.
I'm serious, codex in Mirage is legit awesome, like a history lesson I didn't know I wanted. Everything else about it sucks tho, feels like a game made in 2016.I think I noped out of the game before getting to that "highlight". I've platinumed every AC since Syndicate, but Mirage just did not click with me at all.
Thing is for the first time in the series changing the protagonist isn't (more or less) a cosmetic choice. They're two different characters with different playstyles and in my opinion a tank doesn't belong as one of the main protagonists of Assassin's Creed.Or maybe people are just reviewing a game for what it is and not trying to be political.
Does anyone else really just not care that "playing as Yasuke doesn't feel like an Assassin's Creed game?" You have a whole other character to capture those feelings if you wish and the game does not railroad you into playing as one or the other. The series is approaching nearly 20 years old, at this point it needs to be radically altering the formula beyond just offering "the same, but now open world".
90% of the game, apparently.Can you play the whole game as the lady character and never play as Yasuke?
My brother is gay and a turbo-Leftist. Even he is outspoken with his annoyance from forced diversity. People notice it and find it to be disingenuous. It's perfectly reasonable to roll your eyes at various trends in entertainment.There's no such thing as normal people, lol. It's been demonstrated that there's a sizeable portion of people that do care, though not in the simplified, hyperbolized way you're phrasing. It's a complaint some people indeed have, it's just not one that the mainstream media is giving any fuel to, for better or worse.
My brother is gay and a turbo-Leftist. Even he is outspoken with his annoyance from forced diversity. People notice it and find it to be disingenuous. It's perfectly reasonable to roll your eyes at various trends in entertainment.
FWIW, I don't really think you're retarded.Yeah. That's what I thought.
You tried so hard to sound tough, but all I read was ‘I have no argument and zero self-awareness.' Congrats.
90% of the game, apparently.
didn't you play odyssey? kassandra and alexios have dialogue recorded for everything.I'm so intrigued how they'll do that.
didn't you play odyssey? kassandra and alexios have dialogue recorded for everything.
There's no such thing as normal people, lol. It's been demonstrated that there's a sizeable portion of people that do care, though not in the simplified, hyperbolized way you're phrasing. It's a complaint some people indeed have, it's just not one that the mainstream media is giving any fuel to, for better or worse.
Good point, I've always only played as Kassandra lol. Fuck Alexios.
From Gamespot's review:
So much of Shadows' issues come from Yasuke's inclusion. Not because he's a badly written character or because he doesn't feel like he belongs, but because much of what makes an Assassin's Creed game an Assassin's Creed is stripped away to make his samurai fantasy work. Naoe's shinobi fantasy works far better, effortlessly sliding into the gameplay loop of hunting down mysterious targets, puzzling through the best way to reach them, cutting them down, and disappearing without a trace.
![]()
different doesnt make it betterDoes anyone else really just not care that "playing as Yasuke doesn't feel like an Assassin's Creed game?" You have a whole other character to capture those feelings if you wish and the game does not railroad you into playing as one or the other. The series is approaching nearly 20 years old, at this point it needs to be radically altering the formula beyond just offering "the same, but now open world".
More of the latter. Seems to be one of the complaints as they aren’t able to get too deep into each of their stories through majority of the game as a result. The remaining 10% would be like Alan wake 2, I reckonI'm so intrigued how they'll do that.
Is it an Alan Wake 2 style situation where both characters have their set missions and you can swap any time?
Or do most of the central story missions have two sets of dialogues and interactions factoring in both characters?
From Gamespot's review:
So much of Shadows' issues come from Yasuke's inclusion. Not because he's a badly written character or because he doesn't feel like he belongs, but because much of what makes an Assassin's Creed game an Assassin's Creed is stripped away to make his samurai fantasy work. Naoe's shinobi fantasy works far better, effortlessly sliding into the gameplay loop of hunting down mysterious targets, puzzling through the best way to reach them, cutting them down, and disappearing without a trace.
![]()
It's amazing that people take scores as a trustworthy metric. We know how these things work. Jim Sterling, of all people, called it out over a decade ago.
![]()
Where was the outrage over the Arab characters you previously played in the series. Or the time when you played a half-Native American character and killed white people? Huh?
Good point, I've always only played as Kassandra lol. Fuck Alexios.
They did dumb down the "assassin" aspect way too much with those three games. I am curious to see how much they bring back to table with Naoe for the stealth gameplay.It is as if they didn't play Origins, Odyssey or Valhalla.
![]()
Let's pretend that there's not a mountain of extremist ideology behind the creation of that character and no reviewer has ever written anything critical to the main character of Days Gone being a white male (in rural America, not as a samurai in feudal Japan).Because most normal people don’t care about the skin color of the main character.
I started playing Origins after RDR2 and my god the downgrade in quality and immersion was a shock. At the start I’m riding a camel through a village knocking villagers over like bowling pins as I go, then I see a camel on the roof of a hut. I immediately gave up and played a few years later it was a slog. I played about 20 hours of Valhalla and it was so repetitive I just couldn’t anymore. Those are my last 2 AC experiences
They did dumb down the "assassin" aspect way too much with those three games. I am curious to see how much they bring back to table with Naoe for the stealth gameplay.
Sorry I think you mean Stephanie Sterling
![]()
Would've been better to stick with a single character with different gameplay specializations. The reviews mentioned the story binding between the duo isn't stellar. Maybe you can let me know when you have your hands on, I am still on fence.That was a common complaint. Here you've got a choice to play either way. So, for me, this isn't a negative. I plan to play as both and if the game is good then they will both be fun to play.
well good then. It needed a break from the tailing mission.From Gamespot's review:
So much of Shadows' issues come from Yasuke's inclusion. Not because he's a badly written character or because he doesn't feel like he belongs, but because much of what makes an Assassin's Creed game an Assassin's Creed is stripped away to make his samurai fantasy work. Naoe's shinobi fantasy works far better, effortlessly sliding into the gameplay loop of hunting down mysterious targets, puzzling through the best way to reach them, cutting them down, and disappearing without a trace.
![]()
Would've been better to stick with a single character with different gameplay specializations. The reviews mentioned the story binding between the duo isn't stellar. Maybe you can let me know when you have your hands on, I am still on fence.
If the game let you play one character for over 90% contents without missing out much, I guess the story is less about either of the two characters, they probably just have the same goal in the end.well good then. It needed a break from the tailing mission.
The only thing I am worried about is .... who to paly with? Whose story is this ?!
Well......the last duo they had was in Syndicate and there really wasn't that great of a bind in story between them and they were brother/sister. They were largely interchangeable in most missions except for those horrible historical character ones. I like that we at least have drastically different play styles between them here. Hoefully it will work well.
I absolutely do not understand how anyone at Ubisoft played Origins or Odyssey, rode a horse in those games and thought this is fine, we'll ship it like thisFunny you say this because after playing RDR2, I started Odyssey and riding a horse in that game was like driving a car
Ubisofts, so i wouldnt bother paying too much attention to this aspect.Whose story is this ?!
i worry that the mediocre reviews for this game is going to make Rockstar hesitant with GTA VI, and the declining popularity of open world gaming, do you think that will be a concern?I absolutely do not understand how anyone at Ubisoft played Origins or Odyssey, rode a horse in those games and thought this is fine, we'll ship it like this
They control like weird bumper cars or some shit
Going back to Odyssey after playing RDR2 is like playing a game that feels like it was made 2 gens ago
Or maybe people are just reviewing a game for what it is and not trying to be political.