Some publishers have not quite been tainted in the same way as EA, Ubisoft, Activision, and Square-Enix. 2K and Warner Bros are still doing ok with the lack of bullshit paymium, with exception of 2K sports...talking more about 2K's other development studios. Mordor was a nice surprise for example.
-I think it's a safe bet to assume performance will be on par with FC3 (game ran great on my PC).Will Far Cry 4 be just as bad?!![]()
It's hilarious.I tried to open a treasure chest, but was told I needed the Assassin’s Creed companion app to open it, with no additional information or context.
I tried to open another treasure chest, and was told I needed to sign up for Assassin’s Creed Initiates to open it.
When I paused the game, the second option in the pause menu is an eStore that lets you spend real money on time-saving boosts, bonus in-game currency, and so-on.
What a fucking disaster AC:U is, it's almost overwhelming.
![]()
Been wondering this as well.Has any of the reviews even mentioned the microtransactions? I almost died when i heard the name someone gave this in another thread: Assassins's Greed: Currency..
1080p - 30 fps with a couple of big bugs
LMAO!
Isn't it 900p?
Isn't it 900p?
Has any of the reviews even mentioned the microtransactions? I almost died when i heard the name someone gave this in another thread: Assassins's Greed: Currency..
To those of you who are lamenting the state of AAA games today based on Unity reviews, have you seen this thread?
You're right. My bad.He asked about AC4
Got patched to 1080pIsn't it 900p?
To those of you who are lamenting the state of AAA games today based on Unity reviews, have you seen this thread?
No one is "trying". It's easy to justify hating it, just because you can overlook it doesn't mean everyone else should.Damn, you guys are really trying to hate this game. I've been playing for about two hours with only a minor framedrop in a big crowd. It could obviously use some polish, but it's perfectly playable so far. Money is also easy to come by with side missions and chests that are clearly marked on the map..
Just Kotaku from what I've seen. It's surprising given how some people say they're rather intrusive.
Just Kotaku from what I've seen. It's surprising given how some people say they're rather intrusive.
So from what I gather from these past few pages
- Money is really hard to come by, but you can find most of them in chests.
- But some chests are locked and require Assassins Creed companion app or Assassins Creed Initiates account to open.
- Other than in-game currency, you also have an option to use another currency (purchased by US dollars) to by stuffs in the game.
This is ridiculous.
They should have just delayed this 6 more months at least.
So Ubisoft managed to create a pay to win single player experience.
I respect Justin for posting that. I share the exact same sentiment. The very existence of microtransactions in a game instantly puts that title into the "nope" basket for me.
![]()
Same place it's been since back in the day. You're old enough to have matured past the "video games determine my manhood" phase and start appreciating gameplay mastery again, especially if you have a family to share it with.
That is all that matters. I really enjoyed the post patch Aliens Colonial Marines on PC. It doesn't matter to me the review scores or what GAF thinks of it.
I'm someone who grew up in the glory days of gaming, the 16bit and 32bit eras (imo).
Games were magic and fun back then, developers seemed to try and make the best gameplay, the most fun games they could.
These days its more like creating gimmicks or creating a 'solid' game/franchise and flog it to death while injecting a load of extra shite that adds nothing to the game except new ways to rip off the customer.
I know gaming has always been a business and about money first and foremost but these days it seems to be much more industrialized and corporate.
Maybe i'm just having an off day but i long for that magic and fun experiences of those early generations.
I suppose a big part of it is development costs are much more these days so the kind of imagination developers had in those earlier gens is just not viable today as they have to stick to what sells the most millions.
No one is "trying". It's easy to justify hating it, just because you can overlook it doesn't mean everyone else should.
Look at my earlier post. I am playing the game now. Don't lie to people. The game is a fucking disaster.There is a huge amount of hyperbole in this thread and I can guarantee you at least half of the people complaining have not tried the game. If you want to get blindly riled up, be my guest.
Im gonna laugh when Rogue pulls in a metacritic in the 80-90 range.
Oh god yeah. I spent 4 hours last night trying to play Halo with friends. Servers were so bad. I was really mad. =/
Yeah Dragon Age looks amazing. And yeah, I have no issue either pre-loading based on the fact that they allowed the press to talk about it early, and that it's getting glowing impressions. Hopefully it's not an issue like Dragon Age 2, where a bunch of people in the press gave it high scores, but it was really awful. But everything I've seen about it + what I've read from reviews, is enough for me to take that risk and pre-load it.
Unity has just made me more cautious in general. Lessons learned though.
Edge won't mess with the likes of Ubisoft, Sony for sure because they're fucking pushovers, but big boys like EA and Activision? They won't fuck with their games.Waiting for EDGE review.
You're damn right I haven't tried it, and by all the information I've gleaned in the lead-up to this game's release there's no way in hell I ever will be.There is a huge amount of hyperbole in this thread and I can guarantee you at least half of the people complaining have not tried the game. If you want to get blindly riled up, be my guest.