D
Deleted member 471617
Unconfirmed Member
Like I have said since September, Sony was going to overplay their hand. They should have just accepted the ten year deal and moved on. Oh well.
Just a coincidence the main opposition to MS was in the UK. Home of Jim Ryan. Maybe that is exactly why MS decided to start using this type of pushback?Just a coincidence.
2 acquisitons that where made because the other studios where floundering under his management and doing fuck all.Acquiring two of gamings largest publishers sounds like he’s too good at his job.
Sony greed more like it.
Yeah, totally the same/sJust a coincidence the main opposition to MS was in the UK. Home of Jim Ryan. Maybe that is exactly why MS decided to start using this type of pushback?
I dont have any idea what happens from this. Probably nothing. But I do think Sony twisted the truth of the console market to mislead CMA with this convenient high end console category. This is just applying Sony's definition to Japan. 100% fair.
How is it different?Yeah, totally the same/s
Just a coincidence the main opposition to MS was in the UK. Home of Jim Ryan. Maybe that is exactly why MS decided to start using this type of pushback?
Thats where he worked his whole career. Thats where his contacts and influence are.There's a pretty big difference between where a company is headquartered and where a company's CEO popped out of the womb lmfao.
Where Sony fanboys jump on anyone with an alternative thought ? Probably not what you are looking for.
If Sony hadn't started crying, none of this would have been necessary. Sony's behavior makes it impossible for me to feel even the tiniest bit of respect towards them.
Main opposition is in the UK? Do you you know what the FTC is doing? Or are you purposely being dense?Just a coincidence the main opposition to MS was in the UK. Home of Jim Ryan. Maybe that is exactly why MS decided to start using this type of pushback?
You are horribly misinformed.
The above is from page 40 of the CMA's phase 1 assessment back in October last year which was one of the first public documents we got on this subject. It's still on the CMA's website. I'd suggest actually reading all 76 pages if you want to start making claims about this subject.
But he will tell you those politicians, just want a level playing field for Microsoft. LolThere's a pretty big difference between where a company is headquartered and where a company's CEO popped out of the womb lmfao.
How so? Exclusivity deals are anti-competitive in nature. You give a 3rd party publisher some (bribe) money to explicitly withhold content from a competitor. Its slimy whether Microsoft or Sony does it.Yeah it's far worse
I'm discussing the CMA, and the possibility that Sony has very strong influence there due to who is running Playstation now. I'm aware the FTC is a different thing.Main opposition is in the UK? Do you you know what the FTC is doing? Or are you purposely being dense?
Well, that's different because... Actually its not different at all.Microsoft doing the same fucking shit. Also, getting lots of games, big and small, to Gamepass, WORLDWIDE? lol
Thats where he worked his whole career. Thats where his contacts and influence are.
In 2011, he was appointed President of SIEE with responsibility for leading the PlayStation® business in more than 100 territories across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Oceania.
I was hired in 1994, the year before the launch of the first PlayStation. And my assignment was to set-up the PlayStation companies in Continental Europe. So we had maybe 20 people in this building in London focused on the UK, but we had absolutely nothing in Europe. So my task was to go out, find offices, hire people, put systems and processes in place, get sales forces, organise distribution... It started with Germany, and then it was France, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Austria, Scandinavia... it was a really tasking and challenging, but ultimately fulfilling couple of years.
Oh, do go on. Explain.This isn't about what Microsoft failed to do. This is about Sony's anti-competitive practices that appears to violate trade laws.
Got em.Indeed:
https://www.sie.com/en/corporate/release/2019/190212.html
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/jim-r...ere-hundreds-of-millions-will-enjoy-our-games
The guy literally set up their presence across Europe (and then later other areas across EMEA) and you want to say he just worked in the UK and that's his area of influence?
people act like sony is some benevolent force in the industry. the only reason sony didn't bid on ABK is because they can't afford it.
Are you implying MS only operates in Washington state?Indeed:
https://www.sie.com/en/corporate/release/2019/190212.html
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/jim-r...ere-hundreds-of-millions-will-enjoy-our-games
The guy literally set up their presence across Europe (and then later other areas across EMEA) and you want to say he just worked in the UK and that's his area of influence?
Yeah it's far worse
Point is the main opposition(CMA maybe strongest as it could kill it) isn't actually from the CMA, as a matter of fact CMA have given ms oppurtiny to prove to them why this should go through . FTC is actually the one who shown the main opposition by outright wanting to block it.I'm discussing the CMA, and the possibility that Sony has very strong influence there due to who is running Playstation now. I'm aware the FTC is a different thing.
Point being, its as valid as pointing out congressman are from Washington.
Are you implying MS only operates in Washington state?
Its just pointless to argue about it with you. You disagree. I get it.
And back to personal attacks. Im out. Just a waste of time.So yes, I agree, until you're interested in having a discussion that is grounded in reality instead of fiction derived from emotion it is indeed pointless.
Maybe once they've passed their GCSE maths
And back to personal attacks. Im out. Just a waste of time.
Its just pointless to argue about it with you. You disagree. I get it.
Bribe money. What else is there.What does US Congress have anything to do with the Japanese market?
That’s where MS lobby money has influence. They want to remind Sony to stay in their place.What does US Congress have anything to do with the Japanese market?
Was this about the Dutch language support being embarrassingly lacklustre?Microsoft doesn't give a shit about Xbox anywhere outside the Anglosphere and don't let them try to convince you otherwise. Dashboards riddled with typos and grammar errors, local payment problems, Live not being supported in many, many countries. Their failure to succeed is to blame on them and them alone.
Dude you are all over the place, firstly get it right that is the FTC definition not the CMA. Secondly, the definition has nothing to do with Sony. Unless you can point out where Sony defined it for them:I dont have any idea what happens from this. Probably nothing. But I do think Sony twisted the truth of the console market to mislead CMA with this convenient high end console category. This is just applying Sony's definition to Japan. 100% fair.
The funniest part to me is how people were praising them for being so smart and in tune with the gaming industry until they fixed the math, then it was much like this thread with complaining about them being bribed.
For a major regulatory body, they made egregious blunders in their recent findings.
Just out of interest, what would you say if the contracts were openly leaked and discussed and it turned out that Sony were paying to cut content from xbox in Japan and were ultimately "impeding" their growth opportunities?
I don't have a clue.
So risky buying the highest revenue publisher with the best selling game franchise of the past two decadesBuying a company means you assume all risks and challenges of the firm. You can't just pay some money for exclusivity then eat your 30% revenue share risk free. The two are not comparable.
Is anybody actually considering the possibility Sony is actually doing this? Not saying it's the most likely outcome but just automatically assuming it's "Microsoft bought Congress and are clearly lobbying to make Sony look bad", like sure that's a definite possibility but blindly agreeing with one side without evidence is just as irresponsible