GHG
Member
Aside from the fact that Veilguard was rebooted multiple times, it’s standard practice to keep certain things constant when you’re doing an analysis. In this case, it should be Obsidian. Not sure why the work of another dev team is being cited here.
Their last two games were excellent, and while Outer Worlds ended up falling short of many users expectations, the key variable here is the time and budget allocated to that title.
Budget and time helped KCD2 become bigger and better than the original. For obvious reasons, you won’t cite that here![]()
You're clearly not seeing or understanding the bone of contention many people have with this title and the team behind it.
Comes as no surprise of course considering Microsoft cocksuckers/employees and woke conveniently seem to go hand in hand these days. But it would help if you could at least start to acknowledge and address the issues that people have with the team behind the game (and their publicly stated intentions) along with the plethora of implications that has, instead of attempting to make this about budget/scope/time or any other nonsense you're attempting to deflect towards.
Last edited: