All the splatoons are just way too samey for me. I had to stop at 2, didn't see the need for 3. 4 would have to be something spectacular, especially for $70
Frame Gen on 1500 Cuda coresIf Switch 2 has frame generation like the rtx 5000 cards the graphics are going to be fucking WILD
Frame Gen on 1500 Cuda cores
![]()
Not a chance. I grew out of liking Nintendo games 20 years ago.
I probably won't bother trying for one if there is crazy shortage in supply.
82% of Gaf users are going to get a Switch 2![]()
Yeah, hardware drops really aren't a thing now outside of the occasional holiday sale or random promo. I wish Nintendo would make an OLED Switch 2 day one, but you just know they're going to make that part of the mid-gen refresh to encourage you to upgrade.Potentially.
On some level buying on day one would be no different from waiting because let's face it....Nintendo's doesn't do price drops....
Seriously, I'd not be surprised if we get that exact reaction from the wider audiences this time around.Unless they announce some must have exclusive game I don't see the point. A slightly bigger switch with more power offers no value to me.
gotdizzyDay zero, I'm a Nintendo fanboy through and through so all I needed to know was 'Switch 2'
For Nintendo's 13 million very best most loyal customers: nothing but remakes lolI had that shit
You could always just use the Switch permanently docked but your comment just raised a question for me: how much more powerful would Nintendo actually make a 'stationary' console? Because we know they aren't going to try to keep up with Xbox/Playstation even if they came up with something slightly more powerful than a hybrid system.Totally understand people loving handhelds. I can enjoy a good handheld from time to time, too. But man, I wish they went back to offering a stationary console. There's something about their old, sturdy, rock solid, nuclear war ready boxes that were reliable af. It's not even about the raw performance for me. Stationary Nintendo console just feel different to use. I miss that. For all its faults, the Wii U was nice little console (they could have kept the gamepad to themselves, though).
Good question. My guess would be that they set themselves a performance goal internally, tailored to what their first party studios plan on doing (so for example, Zelda open world at native 4K/60fps). If the price is right and everything else they need to consider, they'll eventually settle on a composition of components that meet these criteria. I'd guess similar to what the Wii U was to the PS4/XOne.You could always just use the Switch permanently docked but your comment just raised a question for me: how much more powerful would Nintendo actually make a 'stationary' console? Because we know they aren't going to try to keep up with Xbox/Playstation even if they came up with something slightly more powerful than a hybrid system.