Yeah, I'm still shocked at how badly WB screwed up the movie. I went to an early screening, and I went home feeling really bummed out and disappointed at the whole thing. I still can't believe how badly they tainted their whole franchise with this movie. They had one job, and they blew it. I was really shocked at how mean and ugly the movie was, and I genuinly felt uncomfortable for the kids in the audience watching this movie. Seeing such an ugly and evil place on screen, where our heroes are torn down and trampled on. Mean, that's best way I can describe this movie.
Strangely enough, the movie did a remarkable job of reading the current political climate of cynicism and fear of 'the other'. If you guys haven't read it, please read Walter Chaw's review of the movie. This movie is in some ways perfect for Trump's America.
http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2016/03/batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice.html
Strangely enough, the movie did a remarkable job of reading the current political climate of cynicism and fear of 'the other'. If you guys haven't read it, please read Walter Chaw's review of the movie. This movie is in some ways perfect for Trump's America.
http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2016/03/batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice.html
I saw this ugly, bleak film on the day that religious fundamentalists blew up themselves and 31 other people in Belgium. This, a week or so after religious fundamentalists blew up themselves and 4 other people in Istanbul (a month after they blew up 13 other people in Istanbul), causing our homegrown religious fundamentalists to start talking about torturing, rounding up, and building ghettos for 1.6 billion people. 1.6 billion is also the number of dollars, roughly, that BVS needs to make to break even. That's called a false equivalency. Bear with me, there'll be a few of these, and they're ultimately not all as false as they might seem. Snyder's BVS is exactly the Superman movie we deserve. It begins as an apologia of sorts for Man of Steel, in which Snyder took the most Christ-like figure in Silver Age Comics and made him a Golden Age figure all noir and war and crime and horror. He created the single most irreducible icon of my childhood and made him a murderer indifferent to the suffering of thousands of collateral casualties, buried by his fecklessness and rage in the rubble of his adopted home of Metropolis. It's interesting to me that this film and the upcoming Captain America: Civil War will be dealing with the consequences of levelling cities, packed to the brim as these franchises have been with city-levelling 9/11 iconography. It's interesting, too, that this iteration of Superman continues to have no problem with killing people. He demonstrates this early on when someone holds a gun to the head of lady love/professional hostage Lois Lane (Amy Adams). My response to that was a "well, of course he could kill anyone he wanted to at any time" horror. This is symptomatic of a movie that doesn't seek to explain the ways of God to men, but imposes upon gods the petty weaknesses and tunnel vision of their creations. It's an attractive teleology vs. theology argument. Except that for this avowed atheist, pop-cultural Superman was the only divinity I ever truly believed in. What I'm really trying to say is that BVS will make its $1.6 billion, because as a culture it's not only the Superman film we deserve, but also the one we most ardently desire.