Razgriz-Specter
Member
Would it make sense to reveal the costumes during WonderCon this weekend?
Would it make sense to reveal the costumes during WonderCon this weekend?
leondexter said:But I'm confused about the title. The movie isn't really called "Batman vs. Superman", right? That's got to be a placeholder title,
Nope. It's the title they want to use to market to guys going through midlife crises. When you get as old as Batman, everything has to have significantly greater meaning! Just like when Frank Miller wrote Dark Knight Returns.I'm more of a Marvel guy, but consider myself pretty aware of DC stuff. But I'm confused about the title. The movie isn't really called "Batman vs. Superman", right? That's got to be a placeholder title, and a tongue-in-cheek joke about the occasional (utterly stupid) lopsided comic book face off, right? RIGHT?
but it has Wonder Woman and World's Finest is just a boy's clubIf they don't have it called World's Finest they have already failed.
Man of Steel 2: The World's Finest
So easy
If they don't have it called World's Finest they have already failed.
If they don't have it called World's Finest they have already failed.
Certain expectations come with that title. Just saying.
Alien vs Predator.
Alien vs Predator.
Alien vs Predator.
I think it will just end up being something dull like,
Batman/Superman
Pretty much, it informs the general public and stands out.
"Worlds Finest" as a title might've been possible if DC were on a roll like Marvel and could afford to slap any name they wanted. But to most movie goers, "Worlds Finest" comes off sounding pompous.
Pretty much, it informs the general public and stands out.
"Worlds Finest" as a title might've been possible if DC were on a roll like Marvel and could afford to slap any name they wanted. But to most movie goers, "Worlds Finest" comes off sounding pompous.
I dislike Worlds Finest as a title. It sounds incredibly 1940's and lame. Worlds Finest what? Is what your average man in street will think. I have no idea what else I would call it but that sounds dated and obscure. In my opinion of course.
Why call a group of superheroes Avengers? Who do they avenge? Coulson (lulz)? It's like Stan Lee couldn't come up an alternative name to Justice League.
But nobody complained about it when the movie come out, didn't they? I certainly had no problem with it. But that's just my opinion as well.
I dislike Worlds Finest as a title. It sounds incredibly 1940's and lame. Worlds Finest what? Is what your average man in street will think. I have no idea what else I would call it but that sounds dated and obscure. In my opinion of course.
I dislike Worlds Finest as a title. It sounds incredibly 1940's and lame. Worlds Finest what? Is what your average man in street will think. I have no idea what else I would call it but that sounds dated and obscure. In my opinion of course.
Batman... Superman... "World's Finest." I like the name... Anyone who knows these two characters and sees the title will get it. It's bold and it speaks for itself.I dislike Worlds Finest as a title. It sounds incredibly 1940's and lame. Worlds Finest what? Is what your average man in street will think. I have no idea what else I would call it but that sounds dated and obscure. In my opinion of course.
Batman... Superman... "World's Finest." I like the name... Anyone who knows these two characters and sees the title will get it. It's bold and it speaks for itself.
Sometimes we overestimate how dumb the general audience is. You don't need "Batman" or "Superman" in the title to create the right awareness for this movie. It just needs to be marketed right.
The movie will generate buzz regardless. So if its good, the World's Finest name could have a big payoff when Batman & Superman live up to it. But if they don't, well... Failure is not an option for this film.