Fuck these dev's man:
http://mp1st.com/2012/03/10/stats-s...r-combat-is-popular-dev-defends-upcoming-dlc/
Yea, Metro is the most..."popular"....map but right behind it is Caspian, Kharg, and Firestorm.
Ppl are mainly playing Metro because of unlocks and stats padding and because they can spam rockets/m320s
at some stairs towards some invisible enemies that they cant see and see "ENEMY KILLED", "MULTIKILL" and "+100"
flood the screen.
And they are actually catering to that crowd? WTF? And then they go on to say that Armored Kill is for the
more traditional BF players/experience? Close Quarters is coming a whole season before AK (a good 3-4+ months).
They chose some of the smallest maps from BF2 to put into Strike at Karkand and even made some of them smaller.
I will def not be buying BF4 if they continue on this route. If it doesnt at least have SL only spawning,
no killcam, no 3d spotting by DEFAULT then I'm not buying it.
Cant believe that article actually just pissed me off lol
I kept trying to give them the benefit of the doubt but no more. They have clearly stated their position and
I dont agree with it. I cant wait until Planetside 2 comes out so I can leave BF3 behind for good.
Your forgetting that the common BF3 player who thinks metro is the best thing ever is also the player who will pay through the nose for DLC and re skins.