Hamas is the elected, governing party of the Gaza Strip, and it won fairly.
"Edward McMillan-Scott, the British Conservative head of the European Parliament's monitoring team described the polls as "extremely professional, in line with international standards, free, transparent and without violence". His colleague, Italian Communist MEP Luisa Morgantini said there was "a very professional attitude, competence and respect for the rules."
(interestingly, the Bush administration spent 2 million dollars in support of the PA during the elections.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/21/AR2006012101431.html
:lol :lol .American democratic ideals at work once again! One can only imagine the uproar if the ruling government in Israel gave the Republican party millions of dollars of financial support during the elections)
I dont support its methods, but as of now, Hamas is a fact that must be dealt with. I notice you're clinging to the 10 year truce, like it's the only proposal Hamas has offered in the last few years. Hamas has been making peace proposals in line with the international consensus for years. Furthemore, Hamas itself, has stated that it intends to rewrite its charter.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1139395429041
Sheikh Salah Abu Rukbeh, recently elected from the Hamas list to the council of Gaza's Jabalya refugee camp, believes that the charter could ultimately be changed to recognize Israel.
"It will be very easy to change the charter if Israel changes its stance about the Palestinians," he said. "We are ready to change our charter, but is Israel willing to recognize a Palestinian state? Until now it hasn't. The PLO recognized Israel and changed its charter but Israel did not give us anything."
Israel pretends that Hamas "refusal to accept its right to exist" is some sort of huge obstacle to the peace settlement, but 1) In its continued support of a settlement on the 1967 borders, Hamas indicates that it recognizes Israel as fact and 2)Hamas wont recognize Israel moral legitimacy because no senior Israeli politician has ever recognized Palestine on the June 1967 borders.
As for Hamas using a two state settlement as a smokescreen for further attacks, I've already discussed why the idea of a pathetic Palestinian milia attacking the strongest, most well equipped army in the region would be tantamount to suicide.