Mr Moose
Member
Remember, they already seeded the new narrative™
But Cultural Awareness
I don't want to give them a click to find out wtf they are talking about.
Remember, they already seeded the new narrative™
But Cultural Awareness
Yea it doesn't really matter how much GP grows initially. Even the Taketwo CEO said it will cause a temporary bump. Temporary being the key word their.
COD CULTURE, BABY!
I don't want to give them a click to find out wtf they are talking about.
*For you
As long as you are speaking for yourself, sure.
“People who will join GamePass to play a live service game will suddenly stop subscribing and will magically still be able to keep playing the game they subscribed for”
Stop with real numbers and analytics, this is a proper COD Gamepass bashing thread and that drop is a disaster in many people's heads, just like Gamepass is in their headsDon't know if someone already mentioned, but 10% down from former 20% is just 2%
So, only 2% of physical game buyers have switched to GP, not 10% as the title might initially suggest.
It's 10% of total sales. Roughly 50% of Xbox disc sales.Don't know if someone already mentioned, but 10% down from former 20% is just 2%
So, only 2% of physical game buyers have switched to GP, not 10% as the title might initially suggest.
Stop with real numbers and analytics, this is a proper COD Gamepass bashing thread and that drop is a disaster in many people's heads, just like Gamepass is in their heads
No it likely won't be. If it was then they would have never done it.It's a zero sum. Whatever revenue CoD was making before the ABK buyout is the same now. Game Pass cannibalizing into that revenue is only worth it if growth is significant. Else, people will fixate on the lost revenue.
I personally lean towards no too (Kotick is probably the shrewdest operator in gaming and he wasn't for this at all).I think everyone is aware of that mate, most people seem to think that answer is no.
Stop with real numbers and analytics, this is a proper COD Gamepass bashing thread and that drop is a disaster in many people's heads, just like Gamepass is in their heads
It's 10% of total sales. Roughly 50% of Xbox disc sales.
There were others who said no to Activision games coming to Gamepass as well and butted heads (often) with Phil Spencer and now are no longer in gaming after dedicating their life to itI personally lean towards no too (Kotick is probably the shrewdest operator in gaming and he wasn't for this at all).
But I'm honestly fascinated by the way entertainment execs are generally trying hard to disrupt their existing decent to good businesses to get less money.
It will print money once the acquisition price is paid for or it came from Mother Microsoft fairy and no need to worry about that?With those employees, Activision alone makes over a half billion dollars per quarter in profit (on 2.2 billion in revenue). Like Minecraft (which paid for itself in less than a year), this is printing money for Xbox as well.
Net reduction in revenue for ABK.COD sales on PS5 remain the same but drop a lot on Xbox, what a disaster if GP doesn't earn enough millions of subscribers.
I'd buy that book in hardcover day 1.There were others who said no to Activision games coming to Gamepass as well and butted heads (often) with Phil Spencer and now are no longer in gaming after dedicating their life to it
But that's for a book one day
Microsoft moved $69 billion from short term assets to long term assets. They didn't touch liabilities. Now their $69 billion that they added to long term assets are generating revenue which is being added to their short-term assets. Had they borrowed the money, that would have been a journal entry into liabilities, which then they would have needed to worry about that. You always want Assets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Liabilities. This transaction grows their assets and has no impact on liabilities.It will print money once the acquisition price is paid for or it came from Mother Microsoft fairy and no need to worry about that?
And the only thing relevant in your answer is your always obvious opportunity to demonstrate your "quality" of prejudging and understanding things only in one way when you feel that what you read is not what you want even if that is not even what is saidThe "and rising" is the only relevant part of your post because you're talking about a decline in sales, not in comparison to other platforms. If physical has declined 10% then digital is likely to have declined even more.
I don't understand. I think you've confused what I was saying.So it sold about 55k total or something in its first week? I am shit at maths.
Only thing it helps is your excuses.None of this salty nonsense is of any relevance to this conversation. Starfield underperformed critically and landed with a much more muted performance with users than I’m sure they expected, but even so it’s a single player title. A lot of The people who were going to put 500 hours into it were more likely to buy it for modding purposes.
Call of Duty is an entirely different sort of game, and play habits and duration for a live service MP game with constant content drops is very different from an RPG. Using Starfield as an analogy for long term impact on GP subscription is quite brainless.
Hope this helps
No, I just think it's ridiculous to shout out "but digital" or even attribute the decline to the digital percentage unless you think 10% is the shift to digital from physical in a year. That's all.And the only thing relevant in your answer is your always obvious opportunity to demonstrate your "quality" of prejudging and understanding things only in one way when you feel that what you read is not what you want even if that is not even what is said
The fact is that I have not entered or given an opinion on the real effects on sales, I was simply saying that to draw proper and fair conclusions you have to wait to have the final data. Especially the digital ones when you assume close to 90%
But hey, I wish you a nice day....
Ahh alright??, tell that to someone else then......No, I just think it's ridiculous to shout out "but digital" or even attribute the decline to the digital percentage unless you think 10% is the shift to digital from physical in a year. That's all.
Ahh alright??, tell that to someone else then......
No one has said "but digital", no one has said that the reduction in digital sales may or may not be greater. NO ONE has hinted that at the end of it all bringing COD to Gamepass isn't going to be a big blow to COD sales figures on XBOX...... That is what you have wanted to interpret for the common of your prejudices when you read something that does not sound like what you want.
I have only made the innocent objective mention that to draw conclusions, for better or worse, it is better to wait for the complete data and more so when the percentage of digital sales on XBOX is approaching 90% and when the bet is up Gamepass subscriptions numbers.
In the end, with the full results, the situation may be the same or worse than what the physical figures in the UK show.... or not so much. Because, among other things, the % between digital and physical is not usually linear.
It's as simple as that. Sometimes it's amazing the stories that some of you need to create
Sales estimations from install base:
This is true WTH would the taketwo CEO know about this industry. I'll trust random poster on GAF who has much more experience and knowledge of how this industry works.
Only thing it helps is your excuses.
Starfield was setup to be a long term subscriber gainer with content drops to bring in subscribers.
My original point was people dancing about players number now means nothing like it did for starfield when long term effects will be known later, but obviously that went over your head.
Hope this helps.
LOL. When I said that the need for some to create stories where there are none was incredible....... I fell short. It's very ridiculous"Physical game sales data....... Thinking that XBOX is 81% digital (and rising) that tells you how irrelevant the data is to draw conclusions about the "Gamepass effect".
That's exactly what you did though. My only point is that the rate of the percentage shift to digital is the only thing that would be relevant there not the digital ratio on xbox. Yet you want to dismiss perfectly good data points as "irrelevant" because it doesn't fit what you want . Chris has even told you "This is almost entirely due to a drop in sales on Xbox" but you want to stick your fingers in your ears saying la-la-la-la "xbox is 81% digital" . The only way your argument would make sense is if xbox became more digital in the past year, not what its ratio is.
Who buys physical copies still?
Better to draw accurate sales as more information comes? sure. Attributing the decline of CoD sales on xbox to "xbox being 81% digital", absolutely not. That information by you is what's actually irrelevant to draw any conclusions from because it means nothing. You dismissing actual useful data with "irrelevant because digital" is just poor form.LOL. When I said that the need for some to create stories where there are none was incredible....... I fell short. It's very ridiculous
Let's see, it's very easy, physical data today is next to irrelevant if you want to draw accurate conclusions, whether for better or for worse. There is NO more. Xbox is near 90% digital, don't you think it's better to wait to know the total figures?? Well, that's just what I said and the rest is you interpreting based on prejudices as is common in you here only in one direction.
Reading comprehension is hard for you that much is obvious.Call of Duty Black Ops 6 is the best reviewed COD in years* and is a game that historically engages players over months and months of multiplayer gaming. When people buy call of duty, many tend to play it until the next one comes out in a year.
So you guys making up an imaginary scenario where someone wants to play COD MP, gets the game on GamePass and then stops subscribing and stops playing it…that’s just inane.
Remember when starfield had those "amazing" player numbers?
And it did jack shit for gamepass growth long term.
Peperidge farm remembers.
We need to see if those numbers convert to gamepass growth, or it's game over for gamepass.
Cod doesn't grow it, nothing else will.
I don't think the split was this lopsided in the 360/PS3 era?89% of all physical COD B6 sales being on Playstation is INSANE!
Better to draw accurate sales as more information comes? sure. Attributing the decline of CoD sales on xbox to "xbox being 81% digital", absolutely not. That information by you is what's actually irrelevant to draw any conclusions from because it means nothing. You dismissing actual useful data with "irrelevant because digital" is just poor form.
Physical has been sold out in a lot of places. They need to ship more.Why no Silent Hill 2 in this chart? Not even at 30th place? Every copy is sold out, thats why? Or it is selling sooo bad?
Modern warfare sold around 3-1 in favour on the 360 i think.I don't think the split was this lopsided in the 360/PS3 era?
Why no Silent Hill 2 in this chart? Not even at 30th place? Every copy is sold out, thats why? Or it is selling sooo bad?
The most that I could find was after Modern Warfare 2 launched and it was 2:1 in favor of the 360. So, unless something from those years confirms otherwise, no, it was never like this.I don't think the split was this lopsided in the 360/PS3 era?
Great post, except the last part. I am opposed any government intervention in how company is structured or decided if it is too big, it grew to this size because customers voting with their wallets (less retail, more B2B, Enterprise, Governments, Military etc.) deciding to give their money to MS. I hate when governments are butting in because company is too big/successful. No one is stopping other mobile phone companies to grow to size of Apple, no one is stopping other chip manufacturers to go against nVidia in providing AI hardware, no one is stopping (probably 100s) AI startups to go and compete with OpenAIs ChatGPT or look at Tesla how it became leader in its category competing with likes of Ford, VW etc.Microsoft moved $69 billion from short term assets to long term assets. They didn't touch liabilities. Now their $69 billion that they added to long term assets are generating revenue which is being added to their short-term assets. Had they borrowed the money, that would have been a journal entry into liabilities, which then they would have needed to worry about that. You always want Assets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Liabilities. This transaction grows their assets and has no impact on liabilities.
I don't know if MS is considered a monopoly still, but with $3.18 trillion, it seems they can buy their way into anything. Maybe time to break up MS into multiple companies.
Interesting, after Dennis left Xbox/IEB he worked for Activision:The most that I could find was after Modern Warfare 2 launched and it was 2:1 in favor of the 360. So, unless something from those years confirms otherwise, no, it was never like this.
Depends on what it is 10% of and what percentage of those folks actually are new subscribers. Unless it's 10% of 100 (which we know is highly highly unlikely), I'd bet the number is good. If no one new invested in Game Pass (also highly highly unlikely), I'd call it a good result. Even without the full picture, I'm still willing to give Game Pass the benefit of the doubt here. It doesn't get bigger than CoD for the service.It kinda looks like most COD players still prefer to buy the game. Wonder if there is a similar percentage in the US.
So for the sake of the conversation, if 10% of COD players on Xbox chose to play the game through Gamepass instead of buying the game, are those good enough numbers for Gamepass?
What the hell is wrong with you people's ability to do math?Don't know if someone already mentioned, but 10% down from former 20% is just 2%
So, only 2% of physical game buyers have switched to GP, not 10% as the title might initially suggest.