Shit man. Thanks for the heads upSo uh, I'm just going to go ahead and give everyone here a big head's up: The whole plot of Blade Runner 2049 has hit the web and is out there, and there's a huge spoiler (one that has not been mentioned in any of the reviews so far) that's been explained in an image on there too.
And goddamnit, in a rare case, I really wish I hadn't seen these particular spoilers and got to experience it for myself in the theaters this coming Thursday. They weren't kidding, GAF. You'll all want to avoid spoilers for this one.
Shit man. Thanks for the heads up
I figured it was the least I could do for everyone else around here.
I'm someone who usually doesn't care much about spoilers and often actively looks for them in advance. I generally prefer going in knowing more than the rest of the audience, so that I can focus on the actual crafting of the film and how good a job the people involved did or didn't do in executing the story of the film.
But shit, man... this one's something else. If it weren't for the fact that I already had a rather bad headache earlier, I'd probably be trying to get myself a bit drunk before going to bed right now.
I'm legitimately upset that I got spoiled on this one- and I was initially quite fine with the state of things when I saw the basic spoilers featured in some of the film reviews.
You're the real MVP.So uh, I'm just going to go ahead and give everyone here a big head's up: The whole plot of Blade Runner 2049 has hit the web and is out there, and there's a huge spoiler (one that has not been mentioned in any of the reviews so far) that's been explained in an image on there too.
And goddamnit, in a rare case, I really wish I hadn't seen these particular spoilers and got to experience it for myself in the theaters this coming Thursday. They weren't kidding, GAF. You'll all want to avoid spoilers for this one.
Looks great going dark now. But better than the original. Ahhhhh I don't think so, but we'll see.
Thanks for being the canary in the coalmine throughout this whole thing. Will be vigilant!
You're the real MVP.
I figured it was the least I could do for everyone else around here.
I'm someone who usually doesn't care much about spoilers and often actively looks for them in advance. I generally prefer going in knowing more than the rest of the audience, so that I can focus on the actual crafting of the film and how good a job the people involved did or didn't do in executing the story of the film.
But shit, man... this one's something else. If it weren't for the fact that I already had a rather bad headache earlier, I'd probably be trying to get myself a bit drunk before going to bed right now.
I'm legitimately upset that I got spoiled on this one- and I was initially quite fine with the state of things when I saw the basic spoilers featured in some of the film reviews.
Thanks for being the canary in the coalmine throughout this whole thing. Will be vigilant!
To be fair, if film was never again able to match old classics or produce new classics, then the state of the medium would be quite sad.
Ernest Cline is the worst kind of geek writerMore evidence re: Kubrick and geekery. I present this extract from Ready Player One
I don't want Cleopatra because she is the boring go to ancient female historical figureI hope that a Cleopatra movie doesn't get made. There is Cleopatra tv show getting made at Amazon from the people who did Black Sails. I want to see do his passion project Dune.
i think i should get around to watching the first one. i've tried a couple times but keep falling asleep. i don't know what it is...
So uh, I'm just going to go ahead and give everyone here a big head's up: The whole plot of Blade Runner 2049 has hit the web and is out there, and there's a huge spoiler (one that has not been mentioned in any of the reviews so far) that's been explained in an image on there too.
And goddamnit, in a rare case, I really wish I hadn't seen these particular spoilers and got to experience it for myself in the theaters this coming Thursday. They weren't kidding, GAF. You'll all want to avoid spoilers for this one.
Same. Fucking hate 3D.they're only showing it in imax 3d here.
what is this garbage?
Me too
It needs to die
Where's Alfonso Cuarón's version? He's better than all three of them. Children of Men > their entire filmography.
Because Inherent Vice is incredibly overrated.
You know Nolan wants to do Bond, in a same sense as Spielberg wanting to do Bond. But they both are too big for the franchise and would only be brought in if they had creative control. Which isn't happening as long as it's under the same producers.
If BR blows up into a Mad Max, he's not doing Bond. There is no point for him to do it unless he really just wants his name on the movie, or Craig's pull is basically "I won't do it without him". The one last ride mentality before the recast I can see happen. It does seem like Craig wants to go out on a high note and only he could force Eon to give DV control.
Dune, it seems like he would have a lot more control over. Only been once attempted and its consider a failure. I feel like he would have a lot more control with that film than Bond.
Cleopatra is an inserting twist. It's the exact opposite of everything he's done, but if he was smart, I'd stay away from it for a bit for two reasons. There is going to be a massive casting issue regardless. 2nd is historical epics haven't seen to be performing too well as of recently.
SW is a why the fuck? It's like Bond, unless he really just wants to add it to the list, but there is nothing there for him.
man, sorry you got spoiled. i just deleted twitter my phone and I'll be treading lightly until thursday night.So uh, I'm just going to go ahead and give everyone here a big head's up: The whole plot of Blade Runner 2049 has hit the web and is out there, and there's a huge spoiler (one that has not been mentioned in any of the reviews so far) that's been explained in an image on there too.
And goddamnit, in a rare case, I really wish I hadn't seen these particular spoilers and got to experience it for myself in the theaters this coming Thursday. They weren't kidding, GAF. You'll all want to avoid spoilers for this one.
they're only showing it in imax 3d here.
what is this garbage?
they're only showing it in imax 3d here.
what is this garbage?
Where is here? Not so in the US
The US has an abundance of IMAX screens, so chains can split 2D and 3D. A lot of territories don't have that luxury and get IMAX 3D only if 3D is an option.Even for stuff like Civil War. :/
I'm interested in reading the leaked full plot, but I don't have a clue where to look and my attempts to Google for this didn't seem to show anything relevant.
I promise not to misuse any links or other information sent to me in private message. I know most people would prefer not to know.
man, sorry you got spoiled. i just deleted twitter my phone and I'll be treading lightly until thursday night.
Trust me, you're so much better off not knowing and going into the movie blind. This is coming from someone who generally is fine with being spoiled, like yourself.
Caution: all text in spoiler tags is purely my personal speculation based on public trailers and public comments by the stars. I know nothing most attentive readers of this thread don't already know. Be warned, however, that speculation could be correct by coincidence. If that's likely to spoil your fun, don't click.
But it must be one fearsome, unimaginably reality-bending fact (I suppose if you were an android we could always erase the memory of the spoiler from your memory.) to provoke that reaction.like, for instance, the androids are really humans who have been reprogrammed
It's all a simulation, isn't it?
Thank God because those twists were dumb as hell.Nope, it's nothing like that at all. And I'm not going to give any other sort of hints as to what the spoiler(s) are either.
The US has an abundance of IMAX screens, so chains can split 2D and 3D. A lot of territories don't have that luxury and get IMAX 3D only if 3D is an option.Even for stuff like Civil War. :/
Thank God because those twists were dumb as hell.
Caution: all text in spoiler tags is purely my personal speculation based on public trailers and public comments by the stars. I know nothing most attentive readers of this thread don't already know. Be warned, however, that speculation could be correct by coincidence. If that's likely to spoil your fun, don't click.
But it must be one fearsome, unimaginably reality-bending fact (I suppose if you were an android we could always erase the memory of the spoiler from your memory.) to provoke that reaction.like, for instance, the androids are really humans who have been reprogrammed
It's all a simulation, isn't it?
Where's Alfonso Cuarón's version? He's better than all three of them. Children of Men > their entire filmography.
Talk about a overrated film. It has great world building and camerawork, but most characters actions make zero sense, and once it goes intothe whole war around the building it just turns into shit, especially the part where they leave with the baby is so incredibly dumb. Also Clive Owen is such a mediocre actor. Amazing first half, absolute dog shit second.
The US has an abundance of IMAX screens, so chains can split 2D and 3D. A lot of territories don't have that luxury and get IMAX 3D only if 3D is an option.Even for stuff like Civil War. :/
I hope you realize Replicants aren't Androids.
The hottest take I've seen this year
I tend not to cross the movie and novel because I feel the terms have slightly different meanings to some people.They are the androids of the original novel. Scott and Fancher simply renamed them. I like to emphasize the continuity of the universe of the novel and the film. Although the writing style of the film is quite different and there are many relatively minor changes and omissions, the artificial creatures remain substantially the same and the uncomfortable questions they raise are the same.
Given the premise of the story and the stated emotional limitations of Replicants, I always assumed they had artificial intelligence via inorganic brains (with other bodily functions achieved from organic mean). I wonder if the new film deals with ramifications of the other organically designed life (brain) instead.
I think the hotter take is that Children of Men is better than the entire filmographys of PTA, Villeneuve and Nolan.The hottest take I've seen this year
it definitely is. to some people. is this the path we're gonna go down?I think the hotter take is that Children of Men is better than the entire filmographys of PTA, Villeneuve and Nolan.
I think the hotter take is that Children of Men is better than the entire filmographys of PTA, Villeneuve and Nolan.
Oh no we aren't going down any path. Just pointing out some nonsense.it definitely is. to some people. is this the path we're gonna go down?