The Orange
Member
Philanthropist said:Allow me to quote myself:
This happened yesterday already, as far as I know. Either way, it's been debated.
Philanthropist said:Allow me to quote myself:
JCBossman said:Does ANY BLUBOY believe for a second if it WAS NOT for the PS3 Blu would have lost BIGTIME?
Pistolero said:Euh...I think that was the very plan indeed. You're starting to sound like a scratched disk, no offense...
Vashu said:I think there are certainly people out there, blatant fanboys, that think the PS3's 'succes' is the reason. But seeing as I've kept up with both 'wars', I don't think it has a lot to do with it. At least not on the scale of the PS2 aiding the mass acceptation of DVD. It's a small contributing factor, but BR-players on their own are selling on a bigger scale than expected.
I'd say the PS3 has as much to do with the succes of BRD as the HD-DVD add-on for the X360 had for the HD-DVD. Not a lot.
Philanthropist said:OK, I just read the news. I'm still quite amazed though, this news seems bigger than I would have thought. Check the size of this thread!
JCBossman said:Does ANY BLUBOY believe for a second if it WAS NOT for the PS3 Blu would have lost BIGTIME?
Francias Castiglione said:Thread size on GAF isn't particularly indicative of the real world to be fair.
drohne said:since this is supposed to be a gaming thread, and we've stumbled around to the topic: ps3 has won the format war for sony. that much is clear. this may or may not benefit ps3 in return, but if it doesn't -- would that still be a good trade for sony? cede your console marketshare to establish a high definition movie format? i don't know anything about the economics of it, but i wonder if sony had some such contingency in mind when they released a $600 console
sinnergy said:And I would say you are dead wrong. If it was not for PS3 having a BD-drive BD and HD-dvd would have both flopped.
People who have a PS3 pick up BD's faster than HD-DVD's just because they can play them standard on their PS3. It's that simple imo.
nofi said:Or the quality of the news. Which in this case is great for EVERYONE in the long run, regardless of the 'side' you're on. Unless you work for Toshiba, in which case you're fucked.
Just kidding.
Vashu said:I think there are certainly people out there, blatant fanboys, that think the PS3's 'succes' is the reason. But seeing as I've kept up with both 'wars', I don't think it has a lot to do with it. At least not on the scale of the PS2 aiding the mass acceptation of DVD. It's a small contributing factor, but BR-players on their own are selling on a bigger scale than expected.
I'd say the PS3 has as much to do with the succes of BRD as the HD-DVD add-on for the X360 had for the HD-DVD. Not a lot.
Francias Castiglione said:Thread size on GAF isn't particularly indicative of the real world to be fair.
JCBossman said:Or Paramount
PjotrStroganov said:I dissagree. The marketshare of both HD-DVD and Blu ray movies is still guite low. A few million PS3's sold is probably having a huge impact on the amount of Blu ray disks being sold.
mr_bishiuk said:I guess Paramount must be well annoyed with their $150m. After the period runs out they can just release their catalogue on blu ray anyway no harm done!
I've said just that all along. They don't seem to give a rats ass about the console race when they are dominating the Next-Gen format. Royalties from that are going to keep the company in the black for the next 20 years...who gives a shit about games? ...oh and OT.drohne said:since this is supposed to be a gaming thread, and we've stumbled around to the topic: ps3 has won the format war for sony. that much is clear. this may or may not benefit ps3 in return, but if it doesn't -- would that still be a good trade for sony? cede your console marketshare to establish a high definition movie format? i don't know anything about the economics of it, but i wonder if sony had some such contingency in mind when they released a $600 console
mr_bishiuk said:I guess Paramount must be well annoyed with their $150m. After the period runs out they can just release their catalogue on blu ray anyway no harm done!
nofi said:When is that?
nofi said:When is that?
I don't know if they could have had it at launch but I agree that they should have introduced the Elite with the launch of the PS3 with an included HD DVD. That would have been interesting.Revelations said:I blame MS and Toshiba themselves for systematically ending HDDVD. MS along with Tosh could have introduced internal HDDVD player with the 360 at its launch. Could have had the elite there day one with hddvd sku that plays just the movies. DVD9's could have still been used for games. They drop the ball. Could of had the core, premium and elite w/ hddvd player at the 05 launch. I blame em both.
Revelations said:I blame MS and Toshiba themselves for systematically ending HDDVD. MS along with Tosh could have introduced internal HDDVD player with the 360 at its launch. Could have had the elite there day one with hddvd sku that plays just the movies. DVD9's could have still been used for games. They drop the ball. Could of had the core, premium and elite w/ hddvd player at the 05 launch. I blame em both.
cilonen said:It's also only for US exclusivity - we're still getting Paramount Blu Ray movies in Europe.
nofi said:We are?
nofi said:When is that?
cilonen said:It's also only for US exclusivity - we're still getting Paramount Blu Ray movies in Europe.
My comment was not serious buddy boy. Especially when their decision makes more financial sense whether they were paid or not.bud said:saying a company doesn't want to earn money because they already have ''plenty'' of it, is the stupidest thing i've read in this thread--and that's an amazing feat.
Vashu said:I'd say the PS3 has as much to do with the succes of BRD as the HD-DVD add-on for the X360 had for the HD-DVD. Not a lot.
Vashu said:Somewhere around november or december I guess.
Oh, and JCBossman. You're a cool guy, but you need to cool off and take a break. You're way too invested in this now, and it's not doing any good.
@Pjotr, I'm not saying it has nothing to do with it. I'm only saying that people tend to overestimate the impact the PS3 had on BRD sales. There are a lot of gamers out there that only bought the machine to play games. There are a lot more people who bought a new HD TV and wanted to watch some good movies and purchased a BR-player just because they can.
The prices are dropping, and the deals they had in America (which did not include the PS3) were of a more contributing factor than the PS3.
Second said:if if if
If we had our nose upside down, we'd drown in the shower!
3rdman said:I don't know if they could have had it at launch but I agree that they should have introduced the Elite with the launch of the PS3 with an included HD DVD. That would have been interesting.
Vashu said:True, but not all of them. See Transformers. Silent Hill has been released on HD-DVD in Germany too. It all has to do with the licencee-holder and distributor for that particular country.
spwolf said:You do realize that >90% of BD players sold accross the world are PS3's? On the other hand, addon sold 15x-20x less.
So yeah, you are very wrong.
If not for PS3 lowering the price of BD drives, HD-DVD would easily walked over BD camp. At any point of time, HD-DVD players were 2x and sometimes up to 4x cheaper. There were at least 2x more standalone players sold on HD-DVD side and yet for the year, we will have around 65% BD software sales in USA and >90% in rest of the world.
JCBossman said:Yeah,I just hate this gloating thats going on, this shit ain't allowed in NPD threads...Why here? See you guys and i guess I AM at some point going to HAVE to buy a PS3
Vashu said:True, but not all of them. See Transformers. Silent Hill has been released on HD-DVD in Germany too. It all has to do with the licencee-holder and distributor for that particular country.
JCBossman said:I do too, Microsoft was trying to "Support" HD DVD on the cheap, well NOW they can pay Sony...I hope they like to get bent over...
BSRevelations said:Actually the BR Association is paying MS for use of their code in the blu ray discs themselves. MS was benefitting from both formats. Maybe thats why they didnt give a crap about hddvd.
Revelations said:Actually the BR Association is paying MS for use of their code in the blu ray discs themselves. MS was benefitting from both formats. Maybe thats why they didnt give a crap about hddvd.
JCBossman said:Ok than that's ALL I'm saying, the PS3 single handled won this for Blu. Without the PS3 the sales of Blu SA's Vs HD DVD SA's would have been a serious victory for HD DVD.Congrats Blu for a Better Strategy.
Second said:if if if
If we had our nose upside down, we'd drown in the shower!
JCBossman said:I do too, Microsoft was trying to "Support" HD DVD on the cheap, well NOW they can pay Sony...I hope they like to get bent over...
If you did keep up, you must know that HD-DVD stand-alone players and movie sales outsold bluray by a significant amount before the PS3 arrived.Vashu said:I think there are certainly people out there, blatant fanboys, that think the PS3's 'succes' is the reason. But seeing as I've kept up with both 'wars', I don't think it has a lot to do with it.
Joe211 said:
cilonen said:Yep it's this. I know we got Shooter on BD, I had heard people on AVS saying that was not coming out in the US - but for 'blockbusters' like Shrek 3 and Transformers Paramount retain worldwide distribution rights, so aren't putting them out.
Revelations said:Actually the BR Association is paying MS for use of their code in the blu ray discs themselves. MS was benefitting from both formats. Maybe thats why they didnt give a crap about hddvd.
Beatbox said:I rented Shooter from Netflix on BD here in the US....so I'm pretty sure it was released here and not some import they had.