If they had game pass in playstation like an ea play just Microsoft owned games they would do mega money. Xbox has been rubbish since original Kinect.
It'd probably do well, although I'm curious how big a cut MS would be willing to give Sony for Game Pass subs on PlayStation consoles. It's either that or Sony gets a larger cut of B2P sales; something would have to give (more money on B2P, vs. big cut of Game Pass sub fees) if Microsoft want to do Day 1 Game Pass for all their games.
Without a suitable cut for Sony, Sony/SIE would see that type of Game Pass as a way of skirting them out of due revenue from business on their platform. Similar to how Apple viewed Epic trying to set up their own store on iOS (and cut Apple out of their 30% cut).
Didn't read so here's a fascinating fact about sea cucumbers:
Congrats on the effort tho!
Sea cucumbers sound more evolved than we are o.0
Of course they aren’t in the traditional console business model right now. You guys say it all the time, their games are all on PC, “no reason to own an Xbox”. You even say it in your second long post.
From a larger market/business POV, there's little reason to own an Xbox console as that's how the market seems to think, going by the sales.
Personally, I think there's value in a Series X, if you can get it for a good price. At such a price, I think it'd be worth owning.
But that's just me speaking from my own POV, and I'm only one person.
Also I don’t think Sony or Nintendo much care about what MS does with revenue they make on their platforms, they are businesses and money is the bottom line. MS selling games on their platforms means more money for them.
Sure, revenue and profit is ultimately what matters to them. But they aren't going to enter business arrangements that have a good chance of endangering their money streams in the industry later down the road. That's a reason why Nintendo didn't pursue the Play Station deal with Sony back in the day, or likely a big reason why SEGA rejected the SEGA/Sony console proposal.
In both cases, Nintendo and SEGA would've made a lot of money, but they probably also suspected it'd empower a potential direct competitor in Sony, who could usurp them in the industry in a not-too-distant future. Well, they were both right about that, but they also both owe themselves a lot of credit for screwing themselves over with bad (terrible in SEGA's case) business & market decisions during critical periods. Can't get mad that competitors like Sony did the natural thing and capitalized on those mistakes.
Hell Sony was scared shitless of MS hoarding CoD. They’d love for MS to always release it on PS alongside any other XGS titles.
Of course they were worried; MS could've used COD in a foreclosure strategy and Sony have a duty to protect their gaming business. Their fears, at least for a while, were probably confirmed when seeing the redacted emails, internal memos, and M&A strat Phil and co. were floating around.
Any company in Sony's position would've had those same concerns when the threat of foreclosure looms over their head.
I spent all afternoon playing video games
I feel like I spent my time more productively than the OP did
Don't worry I plan to make up for lost gaming time today!