Choke on the Magic said:I understand a lot of people who invested in the other format are upset, but why are some starting to make claims that there's little difference between dvd and bd? It's not like dvd's are going anywhere anytime soon.
Feral Youth said:Will it push these?
http://www.ebuyer.com/product/130747
*Shrugs*
Not just Ps3's that can have Blu-Ray.
Choke on the Magic said:It better because it becomes standard in 2010.
sillymonkey321 said:I just bought an hd-dvd player at amazon with some free hd-dvds. I watched a couple, 300, bourne, road warrior, and on my 37'' tv, upscaled dvds didn't look much worse at all. There probably is a difference, i just don't notice it ENOUGH to care.
Choke on the Magic said:37" SDTV or HDTV?
Feral Youth said:Will it push these?
http://www.ebuyer.com/product/130747
*Shrugs*
Not just Ps3's that can have Blu-Ray.
beermonkey@tehbias said:Digital (not high-def, the cheapest convertor boxes just downres to 480i) tv will become standard for the 15% of americans who get their television over-the-air. If you have cable or satellite, you won't even notice.
Vaandaviii said:Besides, from 6 months to now, the BD Recorders have cut the price to 1/3 aprox :lol
It all begins now. The HD-DVD is dead, and when the consumer PCs include BD recorders, the thing will be unstoppable
Dec. 13 -- Microsoft Corp. today announced the release of the Xbox 360 HD DVD Emulator,
"We are committed to supporting and advancing the HD DVD ecosystem, and the new Xbox 360 HD DVD Emulator reflects these efforts by providing developers with the software-based tools they need to efficiently deliver the highest-quality content," said Jordi Ribas, general manager of HD DVD at Microsoft. "Microsoft developed the Emulator to help save studios and postproduction houses time, resources and costs involved with the creation of HD DVD content, and let them focus on what really matters -- pushing the envelope with the format."
Crayon said:Are you an actual Kitten?
Flek said:
The hurdles to success for an HD media format are the same as they were for DVD. There was no overnight mass exodus, no sea change from VHS to DVD. It took YEARS, it took the better part of a decade for DVD to finally outsell VHS. And it wasn't the technological advances that sold it to the majority because those features were there from the beginning, largely ignored until pricing and library size made it difficult to ignore the format any further.BenjaminBirdie said:Which does nothing to respond to the critical part of his post:
This is the main hurdle between Blu-Ray and the Mainstream. It was never HD-DVD.
Feel to take that as a response to this:
...as well.
Vaandaviii said:Woops. this is much better
http://www.ebuyer.com/product/131748
Remember the "combo" DVD reader + CD writer? it's back again. And full of win, as always.
Pioner BDC-S02, reads BD at 5x, BD-DL at 2x, and records DVD at 12x and CD at 24x. 117 pounds.
Besides, from 6 months to now, the BD Recorders have cut the price to 1/3 aprox :lol
It all begins now. The HD-DVD is dead, and when the consumer PCs include BD recorders, the thing will be unstoppable
Choke on the Magic said:Then stick with dvd's dude, because they're just going to get cheaper and cheaper in the few years. When dvd came out I cleaned up on cheap ass vhs.
beermonkey@tehbias said:Digital (not high-def, the cheapest convertor boxes just downres to 480i) tv will become standard for the 15% of americans who get their television over-the-air. If you have cable or satellite, you won't even notice.
:lol Best thing I've read all day.Kittonwy said:Well my name sure as hell doesn't say puppywuppy now does it?
Vaandaviii said:Ok, I don't know how is the situation in america,
Your point is vaild, but I should have been clearer in my post. While I fully understand the advancements of DVD over VHS, in my quoted post, I was specifically referencing those people who say they can't tell the difference between upscaled DVD and HD, or that even standard non-upscaled DVD picture quality is "good enough". Thus, in that context, which I absent-mindedly left out, my post makes more sense. I was speaking only on the merits of picture quality, and not functional differences.Psychotext said:Or perhaps talking about the more meaningful changes involving menus, chapters, minimal degradation per use, no more rewind, perfect stills etc etc etc. The resolution increase was a tiny part of the difference between DVD and VHS.George Claw M.D. said:When people talk about how the jump to DVD was so much greater, they're confusing resolution increase with the quality increase that came from going digital.
strange_booj said:Does gamestop buy HD DVD add-ons? (this is a serious question)
Are you looking to purchase used, or sell? If it's the former, then you may be able to get a good deal. If it's the latter, then assuming Gamestop does buy them, you'll most likely only get pennies on the dollar. If they actually give you a decent amount for it, though, then, "Yippie kay yay!"strange_booj said:Does gamestop buy HD DVD add-ons? (this is a serious question)
sillymonkey321 said:half the reason i got the player was to upscale my dvds. I'd use ps3's upscaling but i have one of those systems that tends to be loud, especially when upscailing content ( my room is also like 75-80 degrees which has something to do about it). I rent most everything right now, blockbuster online is nice outside of the steady price increasing they've been doing for each plan. I love $5 dvd purchases, either used 4 for $20 at blockbuster or from sales. I'm actually a little happy hd-dvd might be dying, i'm hoping there will be some insanely good prices on hd-dvds after the format fades.
Vaandaviii said:The available bandwith for Digital TV broadcasting will multiply once the analog switch-off takes place.
Watch Planet Earth and the difference becomes quite evident. I used to think the same as well.sillymonkey321 said:I just bought an hd-dvd player at amazon with some free hd-dvds. I watched a couple, 300, bourne, road warrior, and on my 37'' tv, upscaled dvds didn't look much worse at all. There probably is a difference, i just don't notice it ENOUGH to care.
Jirotrom said:Watch Planet Earth and the difference becomes quite evident. I used to think the same as well.
knitoe said:Watch PE all the time on PS3. Yeah. There are difference, but nothing compare to going from VHS > DVD. If wanted to put it into relative number, VHS > DVD = 10. DVD > BR = 3-4.
B-Ri said:there
is
a
difference.
What did you want your next HDM to do? i can guarantee that DD isnt going to be doing that.
and HD-DVD wasnt going to either.
Elbrain said:Damn I really only want a few movies to come to blue ray the Lord of the Rings Trilogy, the Star Wars original Trilogy, and freaking Gladiator if they can do that I will be a happy camper. It will probably be years before I see any of those damn my heart cries and my brain weeps!
knitoe said:If I could decide, we'll keep on having DVD as main format until something comes along that gives VHS > DVD kind of upgrade results. BR / HD-DVD seems like a minor stop gap to me.
knitoe said:If I could decide, we'll keep on having DVD as main format until something comes along that gives VHS > DVD kind of upgrade results. BR / HD-DVD seems like a minor stop gap to me.
that sucks because for me it was like thisknitoe said:Watch PE all the time on PS3. Yeah. There are difference, but nothing compare to going from VHS > DVD. If wanted to put it into relative number, VHS > DVD = 10. DVD > BR = 3-4.
ManaByte said:Gladiator is Universal and Dreamworks.
knitoe said:Watch PE all the time on PS3. Yeah. There are difference, but nothing compare to going from VHS > DVD. If wanted to put it into relative number, VHS > DVD = 10. DVD > BR = 3-4.
Tiduz said:Im glad im not one of those people, i really do see the difference on my 1080P screen. Movies like 300 look awesome to me.
Well, good sir, you seem prepared to put some strong damage control on this news if it ever happens.There were so many similar responses to my post, that I won't bother quoting them all. Basically, I understand that the majority of rumors from everyone, on both sides of this format war, are just that- rumors. However, sadly, FUD does work, sometimes, and with so many big companies with a stake in the matter, there is a lot of funding in disinformation.
strange_booj said:Does gamestop buy HD DVD add-ons? (this is a serious question)
H.Cornerstone said:As do Crank, Pirates, Apocalypto, Casino Royale, Spider-Man, TMNT, Transporter, Fifth Element, Cars, Ratotuoille...
sillymonkey321 said:I just bought an hd-dvd player at amazon with some free hd-dvds. I watched a couple, 300, bourne, road warrior, and on my 37'' tv, upscaled dvds didn't look much worse at all. There probably is a difference, i just don't notice it ENOUGH to care.
Ironballs said:HD is an acquired taste. You may not think it's really a big deal now, but wait until you spend a majority of your time viewing HD content then try going back to SD. It's night and day.
beermonkey@tehbias said:Nope. The spectrum that gets freed up when analog over-the-air TV gets dropped isn't going to the TV broadcasters. They will still have the exact same digital broadcast spectrum that they were given a decade ago.
knitoe said:Watch PE all the time on PS3. Yeah. There are difference, but nothing compare to going from VHS > DVD. If wanted to put it into relative number, VHS > DVD = 10. DVD > BR = 3-4.
those are pretty huge advantages and easily eclipse all the advantages of going from DVD->BD or HD-DVD. This is why I think the HD movie adoption rate hasn't been high and likely won't be until the sucessor to BD comes out or they do something with BD to make it a more obvious of an upgrade.PuppetMaster said:If you had a small TV in the VHS era (15-20") moving to DVD hardly brought a shocking different either. The biggests advantage would have been about the convinence of not having to rewind tapes and having a chapter menu etc. And of course 5.1 sound.