The more reviews I read, the more flawed I'm realizing this episode was.
I mean, I enjoyed every moment of it. I don't see how people can complain about the pulpy moments (like the machine gun mechanism) - when truthfully, it was actually one of the more believable things Walt has done (are you guys really saying, it would be hard to make a mechanism that makes something go left to right, and holds a trigger down?).
But where I can see where people are coming from, is on two things:
I. The tone of the finale. It was very celebratory.
II. Walt was able to achieve everything with precision and accuracy.
So I get those complaints. I think they are valid. But honestly, I'm still fine with the tone, because ultimately Walt accepted he's a terrible person, and realizes that breaking bad made him feel alive, and was the actual reason he did it in the first place. And I see nothing wrong with a villain or bad guy getting away with it, or relishing in his badness. I think it's very weird that in fiction we feel that bad guys must always suffer the consequences (I understand why we want this, but I don't think it has to happen. Because it's not true. Bad people all the time enjoy what they do, and relish in it). I would only have this issue if the show tried to portray Walt as a hero, or made him sympathetic in the end.
And I don't think they did that at all. Walt ruined his family. Walt pretty much lost everything. And he still wouldn't accept responsibility for why he did what he did (up to Granite State). But then in the finale he finally did. And so for me, that was the pivotal moment. That was to me, the thematic moment that needed to happen. Because in reality, Walt ends up being rather pathetic. He goes down as being infamous as a drug kingpin. He dies in a methlab - something he felt more alive about, and cared more about then his own family, and his other achievements in life. His family will be forever ruined.
So I don't think Walt really won, or had any redemption. But in Walt's mind, he went out feeing good. And I'm totally okay with that - because he ends up slipping into depravity, and knows this is the person he was, and what he enjoyed the most in life.
As far as the precision of him taking care of everything, I can't really argue against that. I think it's more than fair for someone to say they didn't like it, because it felt too neat. But I would personally say, this goes back to the pulpy nature of the show. And it's an element that has been in every season. I disagree that the show isn't "art" - or on the same level as the other greats, because it was both pulpy and a human drama. I don't think art, needs to always be based in realism.
What made me love Breaking Bad so much is that at its core, it did have a lot of those human drama elements, and these deep themes. But it was told through the lense of a folk antihero, a pulpy story. And that is actually why I find Breaking Bad to be the best show I've seen. Because it not only has those deeper moments/themes that the other greats have, but it was also highly entertaining. There are a lot of shows I won't mention. But they have the best writing, acting and directing. But the aren't entertaining, and they lack (IMO soul). Breaking Bad had all of this. And that to me, is why it was so wonderful.