.....Maybe zip is the other neutral.
Rereading that Thunderdome makes my head hurt.
I want reads from Kawl and Milk. Feel like Milk especially has contributed very little since all those D1 gambits.
The fuck did I wake up to lol
"Oh, yeah, CCS is totally a survivor who's also a role cop and his role was intended to survive by holding our doctor hostage"
lol
Um... is no one gonna comment on kingkitty calling Fireblend scum? Is this a joke that's going over my head or something?
If it is, it's not nice to joke about roles as a cop, kingkitty. ._.
It wouldn't be that big of a surprise I suppose, but I'd feel the same way if you flipped scum as well.
KK can't check anymore unless they lied.
We don't know the full extent of his role. My assumption about how the flag system works may very well turn out to be true.
Also, because I didn't get my flag back from CCS, I don't have a way to check anyone else.
Are you claiming to have gotten a red check from me?indeed, scumblend
Maybe zip is the other neutral.
I'll hold to KK's statement for now.
He made that statement while CCS was still alive. My earlier hypothesis was that his flag gets returned upon the person holding it dying (or maybe just getting lynched).
Err, what?Unless it's a 3 layer deep bus, I think he's town!
As I said earlier it's gone.
Do you have anything to back your original and bold read then?
Actually, wait, never mind.
CCS was a 1-shot, and he knew Gorlak's role, so he was likely bluffing about knowing the doc
vibe? I'll have reads later.
Honestly from that description I assume it's the same power, just because it wouldn't make a lot of sense to give the two same roles without same powers. At least, it sounds like it's the same.
I'm on mobile and en route to another city so I'll post more thoughts later, but after Crab's flip, Kawl was the first thing that popped into my mind as scum. I'll have to go back through his posts, but something is nagging me there.
Vote: Kawl_USC
So are you saying if someone else had flipped, I wouldn't have been at the top of your list?
How did that thought process work?
That would require said role cop being super lucky and targeting 2 power roles on a row, but sure we shouldn't completely discount that. It's just that I think it'd be unlikely to have so many cops in one game
I dunno about Kawl. He could've been bussing Gorlak I suppose, but when he voted for Gorlak the vote was still very much in the air between him and Flame. I'm pretty sure scum had their hopes up about flame being lynched up til the end of D3.
I'm going to say Kalor and Splinter* seem more suspicious to me for that reason. They'd be more likely to give up knowing who town's doctor was (maybe while still hoping that CCS would drop by to give the name) in exchange for some town cred as part of the turbo than bus their teammate when a Flame lynch was still looking likely.
6-4.
Vote: Flame_AC
Now 7-4. I was set on Flame at the start of the day and while CCSs claim made me waver, Gorlaks post sounds reasonable.
I don't think I can rank everyone just yet, but my top 3 are Kawl_USC, zeemumu, and (to a lesser extent) Spoiled Milk.
See, here's the thing: I find the people who voted for Gorlak to be more likely to be scum than the people who didn't. This is where our opinions differ, but it makes sense to me that scum would choose an easy bus on Gorlak to make themselves seem more trustworthy (this is also why I'm wary of you, by the way).
You even brought up this interesting dichotomy in which the people who voted for Flame_AC also, overwhelmingly, voted for the turbo of CCS before he could possibly reveal who the doctor was. Would scum really want to turbo CCS before learning about that? It is possible that they already knew who that was, but the chances of that happening are pretty small.
So the only two people who voted for Gorlak and did not vote for CCS are zeemumu and Kawl_USC. Spoiled Milk did not vote for Gorlak either, but his vote on Flame_AC makes him out to be less suspicious to me.
No, just that it was the most recent flip. I could have easily said "the flip this day phase."
Also alternate theory on what happened last night:
Other neutral is an X-shot vig and killing the doc was a "fuck you" from CCS. What happened to the scum kill, whether blocked/protected/targeted Crab too, I dunno.
No, I'm just an idiot and forgot the Hopless MP thing.
This smells scummy as shit to me though. In a contested lynch which was one vote from hammer on the other candidate at one point, the people who voted for the scum in the running are more suspicious? Bussing is only a good play if the scum lynch can't be avoided, which I'm not buying for the thunderdome. You can call it a difference of opinions, but I don't believe it's one coming from an argument in good faith.
Ouro, you've been all over the place this game dude. This is the second time you've got out there posting "alternative" theories for something that has a way simpler explanation.
And this is the second or third case of you just whiffing on basic facts in this game. What is up? I'm starting to think that you might be the other neutral with your interest in off the wall theories about night actions and lack of detail retention.
This smells scummy as shit to me though. In a contested lynch which was one vote from hammer on the other candidate at one point, the people who voted for the scum in the running are more suspicious? Bussing is only a good play if the scum lynch can't be avoided, which I'm not buying for the thunderdome. You can call it a difference of opinions, but I don't believe it's one coming from an argument in good faith.
And the looking at people who didn't vote CCS, get out of here. Y'all turbo'd before I and several others even had a chance to check the thread. I understand CCS posited the boogeyman of revealing the doctor, but damn not getting to play a day in the game I signed up for sure is a lot of fun. The whole argument in this post feels ill minded. Hard scum lean on Polter from this.
Hey *splinter, I'm looking at your vote history and you vote pretty closely with Gorlak. I think it could just be a coincidence but he's the only known scum we have.
I absolutely loathe making a decision without proper information, and I hate making accusations even more so. I'm not comfortable with voting for you based just upon your vote history, but I'd really like to know why.
Also, I'd like to know what your opinion is on everyone so far! I love reading these lists of people's reads, it's honestly super informative!
If she's scum, I'll eat my 3DS.
Actually, I'm surprised the night phase for last night was as long as it was. I guess it's up to the organizer's discretion how long it lasts, but I was under the impression that turbo votes lead to a shorter night phase.
That said, it's not my job to make sure you have fun. I wanted to save the doctor and contributing to the turbo of CCS before he could say anything was the only way I could. It's not like we knew at the time that he was only a 1-shot role cop.
(BTW, just want to note this here for posterity - if we do vote *Splinter and he flips town, please just lynch me and put me out of my misery, because I am the worst at this game. Sorry ouro, I know you are annoyed because you think I'm playing the newb card, and I can see why someone would do that, but I'm like this ALL THE TIME when I don't know something. I just feel lost and that I'm in over my head and totally incompetent, regardless of whether or not I am.)
Hi, I'm Ouro. Is this your first game with me?
Just because some people seem to think I know what I'm doing (they are completely wrong), doesn't mean I don't make dumb assumptions or make mistakes. And like I said in my reads lists, the reasons I post the alternative theories are:
A) I'm pretty much just thinking out loud
B) When the game ends I get to either claim "SEE I WAS RIGHT" or say "WHATEVER IT WAS JUST A THEORY LOL I KNEW IT WAS WRONG"
either way it's a win
paging SkyOdin
I mean, I personally don't really consider these things to be "alternative theories", whatever that means. I always appreciate out-of-the-box thinking because it can lead to more discussion.
Yea that was mainly me being salty at not being able to play. Hammering was fine there. What I'm saying is that I still think judging people for not voting on someone when they literally didn't get a chance to post is busted.
Any one with half a brain was lynching ccs yesterday.
No reason in particular, honestly. I scumread them both just about the same. It could go either way for me, but like Kawl posted above, his "Gorlak post sounds reasonable" statement seems pretty damning. People seem to agree with my Kalor read (which is not something that happens often), so I don't see it moving soon, but I'd be just as happy to lynch Splinter today.I'm inclined to agree with you but TBH for me Kalor is more like 65% scum and *splinter is currently more like *80% scum. This might change as I plan to read all of both of their posts later.
I'm just curious-- why Kalor tonight over *Splinter?
Just asking because I have enough doubt about Kalor to be okay with lynching him, but I'm more confident in *Splinter being scum.
(BTW, just want to note this here for posterity - if we do vote *Splinter and he flips town, please just lynch me and put me out of my misery, because I am the worst at this game. Sorry ouro, I know you are annoyed because you think I'm playing the newb card, and I can see why someone would do that, but I'm like this ALL THE TIME when I don't know something. I just feel lost and that I'm in over my head and totally incompetent, regardless of whether or not I am.)
The further a theory deviates from Occam's razor the less helpful it is and all it does is muddy the discussion with talk that is ultimately pointless.
Last night phase, the doctor was killed. Possible situations:
1) scum killed them.
2) the 3rd party faction has a vig shot and used it on the doctor. and the scum faction kill was stopped some how, for the second time this game.
Until we have some evidence or a claim that points towards the later, we should operate on the former and not create convoluted situations in our heads. Discussion about night actions really only behooves scum. Discussion on voting patterns, shifting reasoning, and read lists are actually meaningful and how town wins games.
these theories, and ouro's questions about role names, all just feel like fishing. it's seemed off to me since he found the need to comment twice! on the no kill night we had.
Thing is, you can't really tell if someone actually had no opportunity to post or if they simply chose not to. I have 0 doubt that scum wanted to hear what CCS had to say and were hoping that he would live long enough to tell them what he knew. Posting, but not voting, would be a lot more suspicious than not posting at all because there is 0 ambiguity there over if someone was paying attention.
& also on that same vein for Gorlak being scum...
TBH since the only concrete information we have about scum right now is that Gorlak was one, I think it's probably the safest move to start tugging on all the threads connected to him. That seems the most... logical? ionno
All this to say, BSB is a pretty firm town read for me at this point. Tone/nature/etc of posts scream hesitant newbie. If she's scum, I'll eat my 3DS.
fishing for scum
lol you lot provided a 3 hour window on the weekend.
but yep, surely I was just being wily and not really busy with shit.
you got me
this stance of yours might be more reasonable if the day had actually gone on for 12+ hours
lol you lot provided a 3 hour window on the weekend.
but yep, surely I was just being wily and not really busy with shit.
you got me
this stance of yours might be more reasonable if the day had actually gone on for 12+ hours
CCS was scum-aligned neutral with a partner, so that person is out there somewhere. It's likely that if normal scum is eliminated they'll inherit the ability to kill so we should be on the lookout for them.