Which is funny considering it is a British diplomat that wrote the procedure.
"Like anyone will ever use this, lets just phone it in and go home, it's Friday"
sounds British to me
Which is funny considering it is a British diplomat that wrote the procedure.
Which is funny considering it is a British diplomat that wrote the procedure.
I am getting more and more of the opinion there is no negotiation to be done here, either we accept the EU are not going to cave and deal with the fall out from the Daily Mail or walk away and deal with the fall out.... (economy crashes)
Honestly it is so fucking simple, either give the EU what they want, or walk away, how many times do our dip shit politicians need to be told the same line over and over.
Show them the fucking money!
The Brexit negotiations remind me more and more of the Syriza - EU negotiations.
Syriza also constantly tried to get deals that just werent available and had to take their country literally to the cliffs edge to come to a sensible agreement that was actually possible.
Theresa May has decided to commit billions of pounds on preparing Britain to leave the European Union without a deal in a bid to save her premiership.
The spending, which will be unlocked in the new year if no progress is made with Brussels, is intended to send a signal to pro-Brexit MPs that she is serious about regaining the upper hand in the negotiations.
It came as rebel MPs gave Mrs May until Christmas to make real progress on Brexit to avoid another attempt to oust her.
The Telegraph can disclose that Philip Hammond, the Chancellor, is planning to sanction the Brexit spending in the new year to prepare the UK for leaving in March 2019 without a deal with the EU.
The cash which is not expected to appear in the Budget will be spent on new technology to speed up customs checks at the borders if the UK has to revert to a World Trade Organisation tariff system, and a range of other measures.
The Government is already working on plans to deal with air traffic control and migration in the event of a hard Brexit. Face to face talks begin again with EU officials in Brussels on Monday.
One senior Treasury source told the Telegraph: Billions of pounds will be unlocked in the new year if progress has not been made. We have to plan for a no deal.
I wonder if their "plan" is still to make the UK (well, England) in to a tax haven to try and stop businesses moving away following no deal. Which is flawed on so many levels, not least because it will never work when businesses know that will be instantly reversed the moment Corbyn gets in. And if Brexit voters thought public services were stretched now, then..Magic Money Tree strikes again.
So, they're finally preparing for a no deal scenario. Way too late, and it's only happening to stop Tory rebels, but at least there's some preparation right? Now they just need to deliver on an entirely new IT system to deal with a mammoth increase in customs checks in just over a years time. Easy.
🤔is intended to send a signal to pro-Brexit MPs that she is serious about regaining the upper hand in the negotiations.
I wonder if their "plan" is still to make the UK (well, England) in to a tax haven to try and stop businesses moving away following no deal. Which is flawed on so many levels, not least because it will never work when businesses know that will be instantly reversed the moment Corbyn gets in. And if Brexit voters thought public services were stretched now, then..
Magic Money Tree strikes again.
So, they're finally preparing for a no deal scenario. Way too late, and it's only happening to stop Tory rebels, but at least there's some preparation right? Now they just need to deliver on an entirely new IT system to deal with a mammoth increase in customs checks in just over a years time. Easy.
Magic Money Tree strikes again.
So, they're finally preparing for a no deal scenario. Way too late, and it's only happening to stop Tory rebels, but at least there's some preparation right? Now they just need to deliver on an entirely new IT system to deal with a mammoth increase in customs checks in just over a years time. Easy.
There's a potential buyer for Northern Ireland?!Maybe just sell Scotland and northern Ireland to fund this.
There's a potential buyer for Northern Ireland?!
Theresa May is under pressure to publish secret legal advice that is believed to state that parliament could still stop Brexit before the end of March 2019 if MPs judge that a change of mind is in the national interest. The move comes as concern grows that exit talks with Brussels are heading for disaster.
The calls for the prime minister to reveal advice from the countrys top legal experts follow government statements declaring that Brexit is now unstoppable, and that MPs will have to choose between whatever deal is on offer next year even if it is a bad one or no deal at all.
The prominent lawyer Jessica Simor QC, from Matrix chambers, has written to May asking her to release the legal advice under the Freedom of Information Act. Simor says she has been told by two good sources that the prime minister has been advised that the article 50 notification can be withdrawn by the UK at any time before 29 March 2019 resulting in the UK remaining in the EU on its current favourable terms.
Trump Golf Resort could be so big.There's a potential buyer for Northern Ireland?!
It is unlikely that it would be able to keep all those advantages it had.
Except that the EU plans for Greece are complete bollocks, which was the reason that the IMF essentially wanted out. Of course it was only ever going to end up the way they wanted, since the only options for the Greek government is to go bankrupt or do exactly as they are told.The Brexit negotiations remind me more and more of the Syriza - EU negotiations.
Syriza also constantly tried to get deals that just weren't available and had to take their country literally to the cliffs edge to come to a sensible agreement that was actually possible.
The Brexit negotiations remind me more and more of the Syriza - EU negotiations.
Syriza also constantly tried to get deals that just werent available and had to take their country literally to the cliffs edge to come to a sensible agreement that was actually possible.
This, in an ideal world, would be the start of changing the publics opinion enough for calls to cancel brexit.
Except that the EU plans for Greece are complete bollocks, which was the reason that the IMF essentially wanted out. Of course it was only ever going to end up the way they wanted, since the only options for the Greek government is to go bankrupt or do exactly as they are told.
With the Brexit negotiations, the EU actually has common sense on their side. On the other hand, the current UK government would likely take the nuclear option instead of having to reach a compromise. (For all the the shit people give Syriza, they ended up doing what they thought was the only common sense choice at the end)
The first deal the EU offered was much better than what Greece got because they pointlessly demanded a debt cut which just wasn't realistic at the time. Not only did they get a worse deal but also played their little game until greece was literally about to the default.Except that the EU plans for Greece are complete bollocks, which was the reason that the IMF essentially wanted out. Of course it was only ever going to end up the way they wanted, since the only options for the Greek government is to go bankrupt or do exactly as they are told.
With the Brexit negotiations, the EU actually has common sense on their side. On the other hand, the current UK government would likely take the nuclear option instead of having to reach a compromise. (For all the the shit people give Syriza, they ended up doing what they thought was the only common sense choice at the end)
He got a worse deal though, because he forgot that any Greece plans also must take account that it must go through all Euro countries.
A mistake the UK is still doing which treats Brexit like a domestic problem.
I don't know, there doesn't seem to be any mechanism for the rest of the EU to do that, it's going to go to the courts probably.
Unless something has changed since I last heard, all sides are using the vagueness to push their arguments.
The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.
Except that the EU plans for Greece are complete bollocks, which was the reason that the IMF essentially wanted out.
It might be too vague in general, but the article has a clear end date. There is nothing on withdrawing the article, only the initial announcement.
The European Commission has also asked to include a firm statement confirming this into the Brexit negotiations
I think you guys are being unfairly harsh on May here.... it is about bloody time we prepped for worst case scenario, a competent Gov would of done this day one....
I don't know, there doesn't seem to be any mechanism for the rest of the EU to do that, it's going to go to the courts probably.
Unless something has changed since I last heard, all sides are using the vagueness to push their arguments.
It was the EU (and I think actually a request from Germany, not sure) that brought the IMF in. A lot of voices within the IMF never wanted to be part of the original deal, let alone the various extensions, but Lagarde pushed it through. Now the IMF is just trying to get out of this insane arrangement. There just are certain kinds of debts you cannot pay back, this holds for individuals, for companies, and yes, for countries as well. Sure, this ideally should never happen, I also hope my car never breaks down, but that doesn't mean I don't get insurance for the case it does.It is easy to blame the European Union when all the debts for which Greece needed that settlement were to the International Monetary Fund. It wanted the European Union to drop all Greek debts so it could be repaid. That it is also why it didn't want to be part of the plans, they would have needed to wait for their repayments.
I think you guys are being unfairly harsh on May here.... it is about bloody time we prepped for worst case scenario, a competent Gov would of done this day one....
I presume the money will come from not having to pay a divorce bill
Mp's will never vote to stop article 50 as many of them reside in leave voting areas, and their own interest will be at the fore front of their minds here
It was the EU (and I think actually a request from Germany, not sure) that brought the IMF in. A lot of voices within the IMF never wanted to be part of the original deal, let alone the various extensions, but Lagarde pushed it through.
Now the IMF is just trying to get out of this insane arrangement.
I feel it's also strange to blame the communist Syriza, that was specifically elected on this issue, to even dare fight back. That's such a anti-democratic view point. Certainly the ability of a people to shape their own lives matters more than money?
Admittedly, one of the prior Greek governments should have pulled the break on this and just accepted all out bankruptcy. At this point, I feel, they are just completely stuck in this giant Sunk Cost Fallacy, that is the Greek rescue plan. Let's hope the country is in some decent shape in a few decades, and most importantly, as part of EU reforms, there is some ordered way for a Euro country to declare bankruptcy.
Britains ruling Conservatives barred two of their own lawmakers in the European Parliament after they broke the party whip and voted for a motion demanding London do more to meet EU demands in Brexit talks.
Julie Girling and ... Richard Ashworth were suspended from the Conservative Party last night after supporting a resolution ... to block Brexit talks moving forward, the party said on Sunday in a statement that highlighted divisions over Britains move to quit the European Union in 18 months.
Prime Minister Theresa May supported the move. A government source said the two had behaved totally irresponsibly.
They left the party no choice but to act, Ashley Fox, leader of the 20-strong group, said in the statement, describing the decision of Ashworth and Girling, a former group leader and chief whip respectively, as extremely regrettable.
Girling, who like Ashworth and Fox opposed Brexit during last years referendum, defended her decision to vote with the overwhelming majority in Strasbourg on Tuesday on a non-binding resolution which urged EU leaders not to accept Londons request for talks on post-Brexit trade without further concessions.
I did not vote to prevent trade talks, she said, noting she called for such negotiations. However, she said in a statement that it was patently obvious that the EUs test of sufficient progress on key divorce issues were not yet met.
Her vote, she said, put the interests of her constituents over party discipline and referred to support on the far-right for Britain to walk out without a deal: I have never agreed to silently acquiesce as our country heads towards a cliff edge, she said, describing that as wanton economic self-harm.
Is this sarcasm? How can the two bolded points co-exist in the same paragraph? May has been PM for a fair chunk of time now, she is the head of this current government and is therefore completely accountable for its actions. Not to mention that she was the one who triggered A50 without a semblance of a plan, causing the 2 year clock to start ticking towards an economic shitshow.
Throw in her entire tenure in the home office, her 'citizens of nowhere' drivel, snoopers charter and everything else she's pretty much said or stood for as a frontline MP and the conclusion should be that people aren't nearly harsh enough on May.
http://www.reuters.com/article/uk-b...o-eu-lawmakers-over-brexit-vote-idUKKBN1CD0E4
Her vote, she said, put the interests of her constituents over party discipline and referred to support on the far-right for Britain to walk out without a deal: I have never agreed to silently acquiesce as our country heads towards a cliff edge, she said, describing that as wanton economic self-harm.
And where is this cash coming from?It was meant solely in this singular context, I did not make that clear, as in finally the penny drops and provisions are now being made, so 'at last' (weak applause) for starting to prepare for the worst, criticisms for not acting until now though are more than warranted
And where is this cash coming from?
boldstrategycotton.jpg
I see we're at the 'repeat what we said earlier, but slower' phase of diplomacy.