that looked like more of a, set up a custom game, stack your team, make it public and hope people joinRamirez said:Wasn't the post on the MLG forums pretty much a ghetto party system, all of you join up in a warm up match, and then join a real one from there? Or did I miss the point of that completely?
That discount and the fact several people were actually getting this game on my friends list. I honestly wouldn't be angry if I could play the game. From what I see it doesn't seem all that bad. Game breaking glitches are worse than optimization that can be patched in at a later time.Chanser said:At least the D2D discount has softened the blow of average reviews. :x
Teknopathetic said:Dear splash damage: Locking framerate wasn't cool in Quake Wars, it's not cool now.
Tomat said:Flat out bad, or just not your kind of game?
(._.) said:That discount and the fact several people were actually getting this game on my friends list. I honestly wouldn't be angry if I could play the game. From what I see it doesn't seem all that bad. Game breaking glitches are worse than optimization that can be patched in at a later time.
Teknopathetic said:Dear splash damage: Locking framerate wasn't cool in Quake Wars, it's not cool now.
jhawk6 said:
And then there're the serious lag problems. Because all games are hosted on servers, including the campaign missions, lag is an issue even in campaign missions. Get more than three people in a game and the lag problems get totally horrible. We're not talking occasional stuttering here; we're talking trying to play Counter-Strike on a dialup connection circa 2001.
No, I don't.Teknoman said:Do you have a Radeon? Maybe thats what the hotfix was for?
Teknopathetic said:Dear splash damage: Locking framerate wasn't cool in Quake Wars, it's not cool now.
jhawk6 said:
Marcellus Wallace said:This doesn't sound good:
Teknopathetic said:This definitely seems like the case.
d0c_zaius said:seems like this topic is fueled by PC rage right now.
I'm kind of surprised that people still expect "pure" PC focused development for Multiplat, big name titles (especially FPS).
I'm installing the game right now...hope it at least delivers some fresh mechanics and perspective.
Shurs said:Calling into question the character of Simon Parkin because he's British and likes Brink seems like a pretty shitty thing to do.
Genesis Knight said:Supposedly patched day one, as are the loading issues they were talking about.
Yeah, lmao. Even in game just the menu text is all that shows.ColonialRaptor said:Is that blue screen really what the menu screen looks like???
UGH
Teknopathetic said:Dear splash damage: Locking framerate wasn't cool in Quake Wars, it's not cool now.
aegies said:I wasn't attacking Simon Parkin. It was in response to a generalization from another poster. I don't know Simon, but I appreciate that he can write (even if my eyelids nearly rolled off the back of my skull when he said Brink was more engaging than TF2). He expresses his opinion with conviction. And I, of all people, won't shit on someone for having a different opinion.
jaundicejuice said:They locked the framerate? I thought the game was just badly optomised and was running slow/poorly on my machine.
aegies said:I try to cultivate my ability to make that distinction. I don't think it does anything well, and I'm one of the more shooter-inclined people in the office. And I think it has some of the same issues as QW, but more pronounced, and it's less ambitious.
upJTboogie said:I wish these reviews would at least wait til the day one patch.
ColonialRaptor said:Is that blue screen really what the menu screen looks like???
UGH
I don't see why it's unfair to review the product people actually buy. Their job is to advise people of a game in time for it to affect your buying decision, if they have to wait for today to start reviewing they couldn't do that.upJTboogie said:I wish these reviews would at least wait til the day one patch.
What? It's certainly not locked, just performs horribly for me. Super janky 12-60 fps in multiplayer, with most options turned off. I'd LIKE to turn the post-processing off, but I can't because it seems to automatically turn back on when you join a game.TheExodu5 said:Locked 30fps? What the fuck is this garbage.
I thought I was just having SLI microstutters. Ugh.
I'm not mad at em, it would just be a more ideal scenario to me.Marcellus Wallace said:Do you blame them though? These were technically review copies.
Shoogoo said:So we've got 1up review, and what else?
Thread moved FAST tonight (EU)
Blizzard said:What? It's certainly not locked, just performs horribly for me. Super janky 12-60 fps in multiplayer, with most options turned off. I'd LIKE to turn the post-processing off, but I can't because it seems to automatically turn back on when you join a game.
It seems interesting, and I like the music, but animations are so janky combined with the framerate and the way the players move, it's really eh so far.
Graphics are pretty ugly, I'm not a fan of the coloring in at least some of the areas, and I have no idea why the performance is so bad.
The sound...it's quiet, and then if you take any hits it immediately goes super quiet. That of course makes it really hard to tell if you're still being shot, and from where. I think it would be less jarring if there was any sort of fade, but it's literally like a loud/soft toggle, so you go deaf if anyone hits you.
TheExodu5 said:Locked 30fps? What the fuck is this garbage.
I thought I was just having SLI microstutters. Ugh.
StuBurns said:I don't see why it's unfair to review the product people actually buy. Their job is to advise people of a game in time for it to affect your buying decision, if they have to wait for today to start reviewing they couldn't do that.