cartoon_soldier
Member
But May said that UK was coming together. So that's good right?
Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron discussed the row over the name of the egg hunt in his Easter message, suggesting it had had little to do with Christianity but was more about holding on to "something comfortable and traditional".
"Given that we are turning the clock back to the early 1970s with Brexit (or indeed the 1580s if we do end up declaring war on Spain), then nostalgia is most definitely the mood of the moment," he said.
I wonder when the gravity of this will actually make a dent into the entrenched, fingers in their ears collective. Surely, there is no one left now who even thinks this will have anything but a very grave effect on us?
So what are you finance folks doing? Moving to NYC?
So what are you finance folks doing? Moving to NYC?
The pinnacle of intelligent debate in the UK.
So glad I don't live there anymore.
Fuck Britain
I do wish people stop being patronising about people who voted to leave. Why do you assume that "99% of people did not even think about this"? Perhaps leavers did consider the economic cost of leaving but still considered it a trade-off worth doing. After all, the remain campaigners kept doomsaying about the economic costs of leaving the EU every chance they got.
And out of curiosity, how long would it have taken for this effect to 'trickle down' to the low-paid workers who are being still undercut by economic migrants from Eastern Europe? Because I remember this debate was happening when I was in High School and Blair was still PM. I am now nearly 30 and we have had three PMs since then, and it still remains an issue.
So what are you finance folks doing? Moving to NYC?
Paris seems likely. Those with families and children at London schools can commute on Eurostar.More like moving to Frankfurt and Paris.
err how is that exactly surprising. we told the EU to bugger off and take their agencies with them.
Britain failed to secure the backing of any of the 27 countries for its case that trade talks should start early in the two years of negotiations allowed by article 50 of the Lisbon treaty.
Well personally I am not comfortable with prioritising particular immigrants from certain countries over others. All immigrants should be treated equally and have equal opportunity to migrate here in my opinion.Because a lot of people who vote Leave ignore the facts. If immigration is an issue, why didn't Britain close the door to non-EU immigration as a start? That is 50% of immigration right there they have total control over for example. But somehow, that didn't matter.
Sometimes it requires a seismic change for people to sit up and listen. People voting to leave the EU forced Westminster to change. Indeed, one positive outcome of the result was a regime-change from a government of old Etonians to a grammar-school educated PM who at least comes across as more focused on 'just about managing' class.So if immigration was a problem, why didn't the UK restrict access to their market like pretty much everyone else did back then? They were allowed to.
Those low skilled workers have to face a harsh truth: their jobs are gone. And again, this is something for the British government to fix. Instead of focusing on London, they need to fix their smaller towns and make sure people settle there again. Most of the issues people in favor of Brexit have are created by their own government, no the EU. So how leaving the EU will fix all those things is beyond me.
If that's the case that they choose not to use their power, then at least they will now be held accountable rather than use the EU as scapegoat for their refusal to deliver promises. However, I do not subscribe to that school of thought that the EU was just akin to a kindly old uncle that liked to give out money with no strings attached out of the goodness of their own hearts, and gently advise the government of the day on what they ought to be doing.Please give me one or two examples of decision making that left Westminster that has you so upset. Because almost everything the EU does can be blocked by the UK. They just choose not to use that power but complain about it later on.
I could point to the hundreds of EU myths, the decades long propaganda the UK newspapers have run against the EU, the fact that the face of the Brexit campaign was the one spreading these lies, I could point to Farage jumping ship as soon as things go bad, to the corruption in his party, to the ways the UK government is screwing over the British people without the EU, the funds the EU has to invest in British areas its own government doesn't care for, the losing of large companies after Brexit.
I'm surprised there's been no mass strike action organised by those in these industries that will be hurt, or even by Remain voters in general.
Anything to send a message to the government.
Even civil service unions are toothless. Only the bma has any sort of clout.Well, it makes sense being as how we won't be in the EU in 2 years time
Unions are dead in this country, unfortunately. Especially in white collar jobs
But May said that UK was coming together. So that's good right?
You know that those are in place everywhere and it is totally normal right? The rules for different countries are different because there are different agreements in place.Well personally I am not comfortable with prioritising particular immigrants from certain countries over others. All immigrants should be treated equally and have equal opportunity to migrate here in my opinion.
I really hope that whatever deal we leave with, we won't have a preferential system for EU citizens at the expense of immigrants from other countries such Australia, India, China etc.
I don't even know what this is supposed to mean. You think the people in charge now are more fit for the job then the previous group? And that is a positive thing. So... you maybe have heard of these things called elections, it is giving you the power to shake things up every few years and pick your own group of people to rule the country.Sometimes it requires a seismic change for people to sit up and listen. People voting to leave the EU forced Westminster to change. Indeed, one positive outcome of the result was a regime-change from a government of old Etonians to a grammar-school educated PM who at least comes across as more focused on 'just about managing' class.
So the excuse is: yes, the UK government had all that power, we all didn't give a fuck about it then, but now suddenly we are going to hold them accountable.If that's the case that they choose not to use their power, then at least they will now be held accountable rather than use the EU as scapegoat for their refusal to deliver promises. However, I do not subscribe to that school of thought that the EU was just akin to a kindly old uncle that liked to give out money with no strings attached out of the goodness of their own hearts, and gently advise the government of the day on what they ought to be doing.
But as requested, one [red meat] example would be ending child benefits for migrant workers for children that do not live in this country. I do not support this policy, the two main political parties (Conservatives and Labour) do not support this policy - and yet it continues, and just not justifable during a time of public spending cuts.
Reminder: The UK consists of more than just Britain. Two other countries, that wanted to remain, were dragged into this stupid decision because of the xenophobic leavers.As opposed to this sparkle of discussion
As a person living in the USA that sounds incredibly familiar.The majority of the people who vote this way are reprehensibly stupid though,
Here is a comment from the Guardian section which illustrates why -
It's amazing. Divide and conquer. To the letter.As a person living in the USA that sounds incredibly familiar.
It's so crazy to me to watch all of Russia's hopes and dreams for Western destabilization playing out in slow motion yet everyone seems to be stuck in sleep paralysis as it happens.
It's all about the bigger picture and the long term.
Guaranteed to be no trade deal if this is the case, obviously.
European agencies being moved to countries that are actually in the EU is a reason to not sign a trade deal? How does this logic go?Guaranteed to be no trade deal if this is the case, obviously.
Rich people have done an amazing job of consolidating wealth and power while getting people to blame the poor and immigrants for their problems and vote against their own self-interests.As a person living in the USA that sounds incredibly familiar.
It's so crazy to me to watch all of Russia's hopes and dreams for Western destabilization playing out in slow motion yet everyone seems to be stuck in sleep paralysis as it happens.
Guaranteed to be no trade deal if this is the case, obviously.
European agencies being moved to countries that are actually in the EU is a reason to not sign a trade deal? How does this logic go?
It's amazing. Divide and conquer. To the letter.
I do wish people stop being patronising about people who voted to leave.
Too bad it doesn't have an English translation. Would be interested in reading it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics
To the Cyrillic letter actually. It's like Russia got early access to Persona 5 and sent their calling card to the West 20 years ago.
I've really been hoping for months that the Wiki page is an elaborate hoax/misrepresentation since I can't find a copy to read in English but I haven't been able to find any information disputing it.
It's a bit sooner than expected, but not exactly unexpected, is it?
Too bad it doesn't have an English translation. Would be interested in reading it.
European agencies being moved to countries that are actually in the EU is a reason to not sign a trade deal? How does this logic go?
Serious question, are you surprised by this development? Do you think that is some kind of punitive meassure?
So the new information here is that in round 1, Britain asked for a concession from the EU, and the EU responded "no, and by the way, we're going to start inflicting pain now."
I mean, look at these dipshits. That they post these graphs with a straight face. You'd almost think it was the subversive efforts of people wanting to remain.
No, and yes given how euro clearing is done in New York and Tokyo. Was expected though.
I keep thinking I'm going to end up having to leave UK. Ironic I guess since I voted remain.
Well duh, leaving the EU is going to have consequences like this.
Did anyone honestly think that we could vote to leave the EU and still host EU agencies? I think most people who voted to leave accepted that trade-off. Indeed, I remember all the campaign literature about areas that will lose EU funding etc.
However, what remoaners don't seem to realise is that for most leavers - the positive (restoring decision-making back to Westminster) outweigh the negatives (the rebalancing of the UK economy and job market). It's all about the bigger picture and the long term.