Is it? The only country I know that has an overtly discriminate immigration policy is Australia.You know that those are in place everywhere and it is totally normal right? The rules for different countries are different because there are different agreements in place.
Ah, but what good is it electing a government that does not deliver on promises and points to the EU as the reason?I don't even know what this is supposed to mean. You think the people in charge now are more fit for the job then the previous group? And that is a positive thing. So... you maybe have heard of these things called elections, it is giving you the power to shake things up every few years and pick your own group of people to rule the country.
I make no excuses. I was actually pretty ambivalent about leaving the EU, I wasn't pro it or against it in any particular way. However, now it is happening - I can see benefits to it. Whether those benefits will outweigh the negatives, well that remains to be seen on the final deal with the EU and full extent of the economic costs of leaving the EU. We live in uncertain times, previous orthodoxies are redundant. Time to buckle up, work together and see where the destination will be.So the excuse is: yes, the UK government had all that power, we all didn't give a fuck about it then, but now suddenly we are going to hold them accountable.
I am not going to debate the logic of child benefits. You asked for an example of when EU overruled Westminister on a policy that the two mainstream support, and I gave you one. Take it or leave it old chap.Child benefits are given, because those people work in the UK and pay taxes. So by this logic, let's say you work for 40 years in the UK, then leave for Spain, would you be OK with the government taking away your pension?
Is it? The only country I know that has an overtly discriminate immigration policy is Australia.
Ah, but what good is it electing a government that does not deliver on promises and points to the EU as the reason?
I make no excuses. I was actually pretty ambivalent about leaving the EU, I wasn't pro it or against it in any particular way. However, now it is happening - I can see benefits to it. Whether those benefits will outweigh the negatives, well that remains to be seen on the final deal with the EU and full extent of the economic costs of leaving the EU. We live in uncertain times, previous orthodoxies are redundant. Time to buckle up, work together and see where the destination will be.
I am not going to debate the logic of child benefits. You asked for an example of when EU overruled Westminister on a policy that the two mainstream support, and I gave you one. Take it or leave it old chap.
Basically the reason this is relevant is because much of the uncertainty about the overall impact of Brexit on the UK and the EU is based on the kind of negotiated exit that the two parties manage to come to over the next two years. The Brexiters currently running the UK government want to project the idea that they have negotiating leverage and that through the art of the deal, they will secure concessions from the EU. The EU want to project the idea that Brexit will be bad for England and that they will not blink during negotiations or yield an inch to Britain. Now, the truth is likely to be somewhere in the middle, but in the meantime we are all very interested in reading the tea leaves and signals to see who seems to be better at playing the game of chicken.
So the new information here is that in round 1, Britain asked for a concession from the EU, and the EU responded "no, and by the way, we're going to start inflicting pain now."
People told me I was crazy when I said there's no way the EU will capitulate to UK demands.
Turns out a Euro-hostile outlook, fancy cakes, Doctor Who reruns, and newly inferior Top Gear doesn't make good a good basis for trade, and killing your single market membership means that other industries will side with the EU, where they can make more money.
It's almost as if people had been saying it for years -- almost as if even Margeret Thatcher herself had the right idea way back when.
Well I am hoping for a deal with the EU that will allow a close trading relationship, because it is a major market and personally I think it would be worth us paying into the club to get some trading benefit out of it. However, I do say this genuinely - best of luck with your future endeavours.It's interesting how leavers keep asking remainers to stop being dicks to them and call us remoaners in the same sentence. Good luck with the automation leavers, you'll need it. I wonder how fast I can get a web developer job and GTFO out of this country before the doors close. Plenty of opportunities in Europe if I seize them with both hands.
Also, good luck with 10+ years of Tory government! Guarantee you that leaving will cause more problems than it will solve.
I do not see the need or point for rancour or animosity.
It's a tongue-in-cheek term for remainers who moan about stuff for the sake of it. It was obvious that as a non-EU country we would no longer host EU agencies! But I apologise if anyone was offended by the term.Again, your first post in this thread began with "remoaners". You are not being sincere.
Well I am hoping for a deal with the EU that will allow a close trading relationship, because it is a major market and personally I think it would be worth us paying into the club to get some trading benefit out of it. However, I do say this genuinely - best of luck with your future endeavours.
I do not see the need or point for rancour or animosity. Hopefully those of us that stay behind can build a post-EU country that will be attractive to people, exiles and newcomers alike. As for 10+ years of Tory rule - that isn't a given. If Labour don't replace Corbyn in the next election, then I suspect a new centre-left party will arise and wrestle control from Conservatives. The pendulum always swings back. Also, don't forget - Corbyn was never a fan of the EU. Didn't he even famously refuse to say whether he voted to leave or stay?
Ha! Yup an EU country would be my destination. All I need work wise is a decent airport not too far from home and that's easy to arrange.Depending on where you're going, you might be indeed remaining.
Don't worry guys the Brexiteers will find someone else to blame as to why their lives are utter dog shit.
Well we can't blame ourselves because accountability for our dog shit actions isn't an option. Hmmm. Hmmm.
I know!!!! It's the disabled peoples fault!! Year after year these "disabled" people leech benefits from our society whilst doing diddly squat! They're the reasons why life sucks!
Seriously, I guarantee it, the disabled people are 100% next on the chopping block in the endless blame game.
Can't blame foreigners or refugees anymore so the next weakest piece of society? The disabled!
Wait for it.
It's a tongue-in-cheek term for remainers who moan about stuff for the sake of it.
Are you seriously arguing that counties having different immigration policies based on agreements are discrimination? This is happening in every country. It is easier for me to move to the US from a Western European country then it would be if I were from an African country. It is even easier to move to Italy, since there are literally no borders then. There is nothing wrong with this.Is it? The only country I know that has an overtly discriminate immigration policy is Australia.
Did any government run on those promises? And if the government doesn't deliver and then shifts the blame to the EU, that is still that government at fault! Pointing to the EU does not mean the EU is automatically responsible. This is exactly the problem, since local governments want to shift all the blame to the EU and take credit for all the good stuff.Ah, but what good is it electing a government that does not deliver on promises and points to the EU as the reason?
Please name me 3 benefits of leaving the EU over not leaving. And please don't let one be something like taking back control, because like I said before, that is total nonsense.I make no excuses. I was actually pretty ambivalent about leaving the EU, I wasn't pro it or against it in any particular way. However, now it is happening - I can see benefits to it. Whether those benefits will outweigh the negatives, well that remains to be seen on the final deal with the EU and full extent of the economic costs of leaving the EU. We live in uncertain times, previous orthodoxies are redundant. Time to buckle up, work together and see where the destination will be.
So you come with an example. I explain why that thing is the way it is, and that it is totally valid to be that way. Then I ask you if you are OK if a comparable example, if it would hurt you, and your answer is "take it or leave it". So basically, you have no good arguments and then refuse to debate anymore.I am not going to debate the logic of child benefits. You asked for an example of when EU overruled Westminister on a policy that the two mainstream support, and I gave you one. Take it or leave it old chap.
I do not see the need or point for rancour or animosity. Hopefully those of us that stay behind can build a post-EU country that will be attractive to people, exiles and newcomers alike.
Guaranteed to be no trade deal if this is the case, obviously.
Is such a thing even possible?Yeah uh huh. Of course you don't see the point of rancour or animosity. No skin off your dick right?
I'm sure you'll deny it and make some shit up, But every time I encounter some fuckhead like yourself trying to disingenuously intellectualise why removal from the EU is a good thing. You all, funnily enough have one thing in common.
Rich parents that cashed in during Thatcher. So what the fuck do you care right? Can always scab from Mother if things get too bad.
Is such a thing even possible?
As a clueless Yankee, what does Britain even export besides a good accent?
As a clueless Yankee, what does Britain even export besides a good accent?
UK has sold more arms than Russia, China, or France on average over the last 10 years. Only the United States is a bigger exporter.
Car parts, machinery, oil, medicine and gold.As a clueless Yankee, what does Britain even export besides a good accent?
https://www.theguardian.com/technol...ow-skilled-workers-replaced-robots?CMP=twt_gu
1 out of 3 workers to be replaced by robots in the next 20 years. One of the reasons why I believe people will not get what they want by voting leave. A Conservative government isn't great when you want innovative thinking to solve the issues of the future.
Don't be silly, we're going to continue is blaming immigrants and EU.It won't be the disabled, it'll be the Scots.
It won't be the disabled, it'll be the Scots.
Don't be silly, we're going to continue is blaming immigrants and EU.
BULLSHIT.
The new Top Gear is great.
Britain is killing medicine itself, doesn't need any help there with how much they've been trying to fuck over the nhs.
No 10 policy head George Freeman says disability payments should go to the 'really disabled'- not those who suffer from anxiety - Telegraph
Trust me, the smaller and weaker the group the easier it is to flush them down the fucking toilet.
Trial balloons already happening.
This opinion places you in the same camp as Leavers...
"They should become androids"https://www.theguardian.com/technol...ow-skilled-workers-replaced-robots?CMP=twt_gu
1 out of 3 workers to be replaced by robots in the next 20 years. One of the reasons why I believe people will not get what they want by voting leave. A Conservative government isn't great when you want innovative thinking to solve the issues of the future.
The opposite since og top gear is the brexit lads Bible.This opinion places you in the same camp as Leavers...
err how is that exactly surprising. we told the EU to bugger off and take their agencies with them.
I accept that it was ill-advised to use the word, and lowered the tone of the debate.I know you're a Brexit supporter, but did you actually think I didn't understand the play on words?
I am indeed arguing that favouring Europeans over non-European immigrants with regard to right to reside in the UK is discrimination. Obviously, it is legal because we are currently in the EU, but I do not have to like it. And I don't. All immigrants should have an equal opportunity to come here through a skilled points system.Are you seriously arguing that counties having different immigration policies based on agreements are discrimination? This is happening in every country. It is easier for me to move to the US from a Western European country then it would be if I were from an African country. It is even easier to move to Italy, since there are literally no borders then. There is nothing wrong with this.
Why is the onus on me to name 3 benefits of leaving the EU? Seriously, I said that I was not really strongly for or against the idea of leaving prior to June 2016. But I accept the result of the referendum, and I sympathise with why people voted to leave.Did any government run on those promises? And if the government doesn't deliver and then shifts the blame to the EU, that is still that government at fault! Pointing to the EU does not mean the EU is automatically responsible. This is exactly the problem, since local governments want to shift all the blame to the EU and take credit for all the good stuff.
Please name me 3 benefits of leaving the EU over not leaving. And please don't let one be something like taking back control, because like I said before, that is total nonsense.
Time to buckle up, we live in uncertain times, see where the destination will be. Do you really feel things like that is the way a government should operate? Because I don't. I want my government to know what to do in those uncertain times and come with a better argument then "buckle up"!
Well I don't want to derail the thread talking about child benefits. It is a policy that two major parties in this country (namely the Conservatives and Labour) wanted to change but were unable to do so because of the EU.So you come with an example. I explain why that thing is the way it is, and that it is totally valid to be that way. Then I ask you if you are OK if a comparable example, if it would hurt you, and your answer is "take it or leave it". So basically, you have no good arguments and then refuse to debate anymore.
It's true, I personally probably won't be too affected by Brexit. I am a middle class professional who lives in an affluent area, so I am not particularly concerned with matters like Eastern Europeans undercutting my wages or the scarcity of resources in areas where schools and surgeries are oversubscribed.Yeah uh huh. Of course you don't see the point of rancour or animosity. No skin off your dick right?
I'm sure you'll deny it and make some shit up, But every time I encounter some fuckhead like yourself trying to disingenuously intellectualise why removal from the EU is a good thing. You all, funnily enough have one thing in common.
Rich parents that cashed in during Thatcher. So what the fuck do you care right? Can always scab from Mother if things get too bad
Should have us held in front of him to cushion England's fall.
It's a tongue-in-cheek term for remainers who moan about stuff for the sake of it. It was obvious that as a non-EU country we would no longer host EU agencies! But I apologise if anyone was offended by the term.
The opposite since og top gear is the brexit lads Bible.
"I'm sorry if you were offended" is not an apology, nor was your comment "tongue in cheek".
As was noted, you are not being sincere.
I apologised and said it was a mistake to use the word, even in jest."I'm sorry if you were offended" is not an apology, nor was your comment "tongue in cheek".
As was noted, you are not being sincere.