60fps be damned, how in the hell does a game with this many graphical shortcomings receive such high scores in that particular category, and across the board no less? Granted I'm playing what people say is the version that is the most lacking in this respect, but I have a hard time believing that the difference would be that great between versions.
On a positive note, I hope Ubi is taking notes on how to properly present a war themed game here. It really does feel like bloody serious business, and not in a corny way either.