Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 - DF face-off

That's not my point. My point is to look at the games for yourself, then decide because that excludes the middle man. Certainly most Xbox ports are superior, but I can say this because I've personally seen the games, and excluded the middle man in the decision factor. Bayonetta, Skyrim, Black ops, etc all superior on Xbox, but I don't need an biased site like DF to tell me that or try to absolutely tank the PS3 version of these games.

Reality is biased towards the 360 when it comes to multi-plats.
 
God damn that ps3 version is looking might ugly.

Join the PC ranks and be done with it! 1080p native res, 4xAA, locked 120fps on a 120 hz monitor, best way to play if you ask me :-)
 
As a multiplat owner, I'd rarely be silly enough to buy a PS3 version of almost ANY game (except Vanquish, that's the right one), let alone a CoD game.

Regardless, after this long, Treyarch should have got their shit together by now.

Almost makes you believe in conspiracy theories.
 
Usually suffers.

Brink, DNF (:/), LA Noire, Portal 2, Burnout Paradise, FFXIII, Ninja Gaiden 3, Saints Row 3, Vanquish (v-synced), meh, there are plenty. Portal 2, FFXIII and DNF in particular are far better on PS3.

But yeah, 80-90% of the time, it's Xbox. 100% when it comes to CoD, even CoD4, the closest of the lot, was ever so slightly better on Xbox.
Oblivion was better on PS3 than 360, wasn't it? Which is odd considering it's the other way with Skyrim.
 
PS3 version is unacceptable but both look like shit. I tried MW3 during a free weekend on Steam and was shocked by how shitty it looked at 1200p with AA, so I don't know if these games ever actually look good. It also played like babby's first FPS. I have no idea what people still see in this franchise.
 
.

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head-rage-analysis/

Totally swept under the rug by DF, and not even mentioned in their "face off". If the situation is vice versa, like BO2's questionable framerate advantage on the 360, there is significant magnification of the PS3's supposed deficiency. You can't really trust a site like that. Better off seeing what the game looks like in person and make your own judgement.

I own the PS3 version. The texture pop in is so bad it almost makes the game unplayable.

Most people won't even notice a drop from 60 to 45 in heavy fighting conditions.

Stevie Wonder could see the PS3 texture pop in. I only bought the PS3 one to avoid 3 discs on 360.
 
I own the PS3 version. The texture pop in is so bad it almost makes the game unplayable.

Most people won't even notice a drop from 60 to 45 in heavy fighting conditions.

Stevie Wonder could see the PS3 texture pop in. I only bought the PS3 one to avoid 3 discs on 360.

I wouldn't worry about it. The guy is obviously on a different plane of reality and our universes have just temporarily got their wires crossed. I have no idea how anyone can claim the texture pop on PS3 is subjective unless they haven't seen what texture pop looks like in rage. You can put a stop watch on both versions and conclusively prove the PS3 version is worse. He tries to make it sound like a matter of opinion.
 
PS3 version is unacceptable but both look like shit. I tried MW3 during a free weekend on Steam and was shocked by how shitty it looked at 1200p with AA, so I don't know if these games ever actually look good. It also played like babby's first FPS. I have no idea what people still see in this franchise.

Setting aside how awful the PS3 versions look, as far console shooters go there isn't anything else that is as remotely smooth. Not the MoHs and certainly not the Crysis games.
 
Setting aside how awful the PS3 versions look, as far console shooters go there isn't anything else that is as remotely smooth. Not the MoHs and certainly not the Crysis games.

Yeah framerate is one thing I will always give the series credit for. I wish more console game makers gave a shit about it. But everything else is awful.
 
Is anyone really surprised at this outcome ? we've had the same result on the same engine / franchise since 2007 ...
 
k4Tm9.jpg


Jesus, there's almost always a 10~20 FPS difference during gameplay sequences (not counting scripted one's)
 
Crikey, I think this is the first time I've entered one of these threads, are they all this bad?

Anyway, received a reply from Richard Leadbetter. They're looking into the PS3 blur issue so expect a revised article and hopefully word gets to Treyarch so they can repatch the game pronto.
 
I'm playing in 1080p on my PS3 and I'm sitting about 9 feet back from a 50" Viera VT50 Plasma.

Maybe this is important: I have not applied any patch so I'm running the retail disc as shipped.

I've only played the first two full missions and so far, to me , it looks fine. There's definitely no blurriness. Yeah, some textures are quite low res but others are pin sharp (wall signs, for example). There's very little aliasing from where I'm sitting and overall, it looks pretty clean and surprisingly good. Certainly exceeded my expectations based on Blops 1 (which isn't exactly hard) and what I've read in this thread.

So far I also haven't really noticed any framerate drops either. It feels nice and fluid. /shrugs

I could have bought it for my 360 but all my mates have PS3's so it doesn't make sense to buy on PS3.

So yeah, thus far I can confirm it looks nothing like the comparison photos that have been posted. I imagine my PS+ will update the game overnight however, so I look forward to seeing the IQ ruined by the patch.
Screens were floating around showing how blurry the PS3 version was the night before launch.

If you're not seeing any blurriness, it's probably just because you don't have the 360 version next to it to compare. I've played the PS3 version too and after seeing the screens pre-launch I thought people were exaggerating. However I've since been able to compare to the 360 version and it's definitely blurry and a loss of detail in the pictures.
 
DF are just updating the article now so keep your eyes peeled.

Richard's just mailed me a couple of direct grabs of the PS3 version comparing with and without patch. Clear difference in sharpness and clarity. Be interested to see just what went wrong with the patch.
 
Interesting to see other PC users have problems with DoF high. I only drop frames below 60fps when I'm downsampling as well. Are we sure it's actually a bug and not just a performance hog?
 
Redboxed on 360 this today, I don't remember Black Ops looking this bad, but I suppose that was 2 years ago. I completely skipped MW3, did it look this dated?
 
Article has been updated with a comparison showing the difference between PS3 patched and unpatched. They've even quoted my full name, ahem.

No Patch / No Blur
nopatch.png


Patch / Blur
patch.png


The difference is definitely more apparent than those shots portray, however. Hopefully Treyarch acknowledges and repatches the game.
 
Article has been updated with a comparison showing the difference between PS3 patched and unpatched. They've even quoted my full name, ahem.

No Patch / No Blur
nopatch.png

If someone told me this was the same system that ran Uncharted... I would never believe it.
 
That's not my point. My point is to look at the games for yourself, then decide because that excludes the middle man. Certainly most Xbox ports are superior, but I can say this because I've personally seen the games, and excluded the middle man in the decision factor. Bayonetta, Skyrim, Black ops, etc all superior on Xbox, but I don't need an biased site like DF to tell me that or try to absolutely tank the PS3 version of these games.
So you're saying, that you can do a better job of discerning which SKU performs better, simply by looking, than DF can with all their state of the art capturing software? And their expertise?

Oh, never mind, you dropped the usual "DF is biased" line. I hope you aren't insulted if I dismiss your idiotic post entirely.
 
God damn that ps3 version is looking might ugly.

Join the PC ranks and be done with it! 1080p native res, 4xAA, locked 120fps on a 120 hz monitor, best way to play if you ask me :-)
See, it's posts like this that piss me off, bragging about how super awesome your rig is, under the guise of saying it might look a touch better on PC. 1080p120 with 4xAA is better than the consoles? Holy shit, your right!

What do you mean, "best way to play if you ask me"? Well of course it is, it goes without saying. No one would possibly dispute that. But just say," it looks amazing on my PC", this "IMO" bullshit is just annoying.

We all know every single game released (pretty much) will look better on PC. It's a given. It's really not necessary to dress it up as a personal preference, it's an objective reality.
 
See, it's posts like this that piss me off, bragging about how super awesome your rig is, under the guise of saying it might look a touch better on PC. 1080p120 with 4xAA is better than the consoles? Holy shit, your right!

What do you mean, "best way to play if you ask me"? Well of course it is, it goes without saying. No one would possibly dispute that. But just say," it looks amazing on my PC", this "IMO" bullshit is just annoying.

We all know every single game released (pretty much) will look better on PC. It's a given. It's really not necessary to dress it up as a personal preference, it's an objective reality.

If it's true, there are no reasons not to say it.

I have the feeling you would not have any problems if it was a PS3/360 gamer claiming the same....

And I find it very surprising that you are enraged by his use of "IMO", usually PC gamers are advised to explicitly specify that it is just an opinion. The whole "objective superiority" argument has been played out, let people enjoy their games the way they want and it applies to PC gamers as well. ;)
 
If it's true, there are no reasons not to say it.

I have the feeling you would not have any problems if it was a PS3/360 gamer claiming the same....
It all just goes without saying, is my point. It's this way of putting across as, "well, you console plebs carry on, I'm awesome, I have a PC."

It's just annoying, rightly or wrongly!

And no, I wouldn't think the same way if it was a PS360 gamer, because they wouldn't be stating the blatantly fucking obvious ad nauseum in every thread!
 
It all just goes without saying, is my point. It's this way of putting across as, "well, you console plebs carry on, I'm awesome, I have a PC."
Oh, I agree it sounds very condescending sometimes but there is nothing wrong with enjoying our platform of choice.
You might add that there are more "sublte" ways of doing it but the baseline remains true. And I would not have any problems with a PS4 gamer in 2014 tauting the PC crowd with its superior graphics, that's just the way it is.

It's just annoying, rightly or wrongly!
And no, I wouldn't think the same way if it was a PS360 gamer, because they wouldn't be stating the blatantly fucking obvious ad nauseum in every thread!
I don't believe there are malicious intents on their end, it's just that they....like playing on PC.
I don't know why you seem so gutted, there is nothing to be upset about really.
We are on a video game forum and this kind of reaction is par for the course.
The fact that it's "obvious" is not a valid complaint IMO, I'm certainly not going to censor myself (if I genuinely believe X PC game/port looks way better than Y) because it may come across as barefaced to some people.
 
Guys what if they introduced the Blur intentionally to mitigate the fucking horrible aliasing ? that unpatched screen looks worse imo.
 
Guys what if they introduced the Blur intentionally to mitigate the fucking horrible aliasing ? that unpatched screen looks worse imo.

It doesn't in motion. I'd even go out on one to say it looks like the prettiest PS3 COD to date IQ-wise.

Hopefully DF do the decent thing and fully revise the article when/if it gets repatched.
 
Hopefully DF do the decent thing and fully revise the article when/if it gets repatched.

They will, this isn't it, they're doing a massive full face off between PS3/360/PC over the weekend, Leadbetter said Saturday IIRC, this is just a preliminary thing.

In-fact the full write up is being done by the other guy, Thomas, not Richard. That should please the DF haters too I guess.
 
They will, this isn't it, they're doing a massive full face off between PS3/360/PC over the weekend, Leadbetter said Saturday IIRC, this is just a preliminary thing.

In-fact the full write up is being done by the other guy, Thomas, not Richard. That should please the DF haters too I guess.

Ah, fair enough. Be interesting to see if they can get to the bottom of what causes the blur.

And hopefully word reaches Treyarch somehow. I don't use Twitter so can't contact them myself. Went to the offical forums and, well, it's rather 'chaotic' over there shall we say :)
 
[/IMG]
I'm not "upset" or "gutted" for god sake! I mean, it's unfortunate that I don't get to play on PC, but I ain't crying into my cereal about it!
My point is that you are completely overreacting. Aside from the "elitist" feeling which I disapprove as well, I don't see anything to rage over.

Anyway next-gen is just around the corner, and hopefully will blow away anything we've seen on high-end PC hardware.
 
My point is that you are completely overreacting.
th_axb1pj.gif


Completely over-reacting? This from the person who thinks I was "gutted" and "upset" about not having a gaming PC. What am I, 8 years old? I've explained my POV clearly, it's great that people get to play games in higher fidelity on PC, I wish I could also, but it ain't news to anybody that you get the superior version.

If you still wish to dress me up as a whinging, childish, fanboy, go right ahead I guess. There appears to be no reasoning with you.
 
Completely over-reacting? This from the person who thinks I was "gutted" and "upset" about not having a gaming PC.
No, you misunderstood my post. The fact that you don't game on PC has nothing to do with the words I chose. I was referring to the tone of your posts.

What am I, 8 years old? I've explained my POV clearly, it's great that people get to play games in higher fidelity on PC, I wish I could also, but it ain't news to anybody that you get the superior version.
See, I can't fathom out why you use the same terminology (superior) that the ones you despise for voicing their opinion.
How strange.
Please note that I never used the term (or once) and if you have read my posts you should know that I don't like this term being used to refer to PC versions because honestly there are various parameters to take into account. I'm sure you would agree with me on that one.
Better graphics don't necessarily mean "superior version" in my book. As I've said countless times different gamers value their gaming time differently.

If you still wish to dress me up as a whinging, childish, fanboy, go right ahead I guess. There appears to be no reasoning with you.
Perhaps the fact that I'm not a native speaker of English is responsible for my lack of tact but I assure you I never imagined that you would take this so seriously.
I did not mean to offend you by using the term "overreacting", I'm sorry but it seems to me that you are building a case for something that isn't there. A gaffer dared to voice his opinion on the PC port and right after you are jumping at his throat...Why bother ? You are free to discard his posts (or mine) if you think they are not worthy of being responded to, if an opinion infuriates you so much then perhaps it would be wiser not to engage them.

Saying that the PC version looks better should not be offensive to anyone. Hence why I was surprised by your posts. It sounded like someone killed your dog or something.
 
It doesn't in motion. I'd even go out on one to say it looks like the prettiest PS3 COD to date IQ-wise.

Hopefully DF do the decent thing and fully revise the article when/if it gets repatched.

I have to agree with this. I'm surprised how clean it looks in 1080p on my PS3. Admittedly my viewing distance definitely compensates but whilst the PS3 version might not be on par with 360, it's by no means a Bayonetta situation.

If you're a PS3 only owner, there's certainly no reason to not pick BLOPS 2 up if you so wish, especially seeing the blur will be removed in a future patch. It's simply not that big a deal as is being made out.
 
Sorry Eideka, we cool.

I had a whinge, you replied, I took offence, you responded, blah blah!

Anyway, it's just something that rubs me up. It probably shouldn't, and that probably isn't the intention.

Anyway, water under the bridge mang!

7f5zB.gif


(I know this has nothing at all to do with this, but it lightens the mood right?)
 
Sorry Eideka, we cool.
I had a whinge, you replied, I took offence, you responded, blah blah!
Anyway, it's just something that rubs me up. It probably shouldn't, and that probably isn't the intention.
Anyway, water under the bridge mang!
Just to be clear : the whole point of my posts is not "who is wrong/right" but rather "why does he take offence ?".
I merely wanted to understand this, thanks for clarifying this.
 
Top Bottom