• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Canadian General Election (OT) - #elxn42: October 19, 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.

Divvy

Canadians burned my passport
I already figured out my criteria for where I could live and the only conceivable place on the planet is Toronto, maybe Montreal.

I need this election to go well guys, I have nowhere to move to :(
 
What is crazy is that QC is showing a tie between the NDP and the CPC.

take into account the CPC support is concentrated in key QC regions while the NDP is spread out.

You can have a region that has high CPC support that will translate into fewer seats while the NDP support is spread out that can translate into 40+ ridings.

Like Max Bernier in Beauce, his region is supper Credististe Conservative but they elect one MP.

the Conservative ceiling is 12 to 13 seats in Quebec. (elected 5 in 2011)

While the Liberals take away many Urban populated Montreal ridings whos' seat count doubles the Conservatives in Qc.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
Just got a notifcation on my phone....for this.

Niqab ban for public servants would be considered: Stephen Harper

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper says his government would consider banning public servants from wearing the niqab, but rejects the suggestion that recent assaults against Muslim women should stifle debate about the issue.
The Conservatives' steps to ban wearing a niqab while taking the citizenship oath, along with the campaign pledge to create a "barbaric cultural practices" tip line, have led some to accuse the Conservatives of engaging in identity politics and fuelling anti-Muslim sentiment.
There have been at least two recently reported assaults on Muslim women in the wake of the niqab controversy. Two teenagers on their bikes came up behind a pregnant Montreal woman and tried to rip off her hijab, causing her to fall. Another woman said she was "singled out" and elbowed by a man in a Toronto mall for wearing a niqab.

In an interview Tuesday with CBC Radio's The House, Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said the public debate over the niqab has become too heated, and he made an appeal to Harper.

"To the prime minister directly: Stop this before someone truly gets hurt. We've had women attacked in the streets for wearing hijabs and niqabs. This is not Canada," Trudeau told host Chris Hall.

Harper was asked why the government should be able to tell people like Ishaq how to dress and how to live.

He said that the government is trying to promote the broad view that Canada is an open and equal society and that there are times when people must reveal their identity.
Barton asked Harper whether public servants should be allowed to wear the niqab.

"That's a matter we're going to examine," Harper said. "Quebec, as you know, has legislation on this. We're looking at that legislation."


Harper, whose government is taking the niqab issue to the Supreme Court, said his party is united with public opinion on this issue.

"It's not by any means the biggest issue for the campaign. The biggest issue is the economy, but I think our position here is widely understood and supported."
God save this country. And thank you, Mr. Trudeau.
The Liberals have won plenty under FPTP in the past and they will again in the future. No party will govern forever.
If the Liberals do well this election and the NDP do poorly I don't see why they would want to join. They'd probably think they could come out on top next election.
This is my concern as well. Obviously PR is the most fair way to do things but different parties have different motivations. Azih has said that a lot of Liberal MPs are in support of it but I'm pretty sure Trudeau can just have them all silenced and switch to the Australian system (which is said to be similar to FPTP). I guess this would not be possible with a Liberal minority but then again, I could see the Conservatives voting with the Liberals on it since it keeps the status quo, which is good for both parties... This is why I am feeling very apathetic at this point since the NDP is dead and I'm pretty sure PR died with them.
I am ready to pack my bags and move to Sweden. fuck this shit.
Hahaha! Sweden is about receive a large shipment of Canadians after this election.
I will be a part of it.
Gotta learn Swedish first. Or was that Finland. One of them requires a language test anyway. lol

Maybe we can convince NordicGAF members to marry us and help us get Swedish green cards. :p

I have family there so I'll my marry my cousin or something.
 

UberTag

Member
This is my concern as well. Obviously PR is the most fair way to do things but different parties have different motivations. Azih has said that a lot of Liberal MPs are in support of it but I'm pretty sure Trudeau can just have them all silenced and switch to the Australian system (which is said to be similar to FPTP). I guess this would not be possible with a Liberal minority but then again, I could see the Conservatives voting with the Liberals on it since it keeps the status quo, which is good for both parties... This is why I am feeling very apathetic at this point since the NDP is dead and I'm pretty sure PR died with them.
Win or lose, Lynton Crosby's attack on the NDP has destroyed the hope for PR to be introduced any time in this country's future and that's a victory that both the Conservatives AND Liberals can be proud of. Fuck them both. (I'm still voting Liberal in two weeks.)

Damn, maybe the liberals dont have momentum.

This is terrible news.
They don't have momentum. They never did. We're screwed in 13 days and you had best prepare for it now... or watch the Blue Jays and happily ignore the inevitable outcome.
 

Dazzler

Member
Ireland will give citizenship to you if you have one Irish grandparent

So if I was to have kids here in Canada, their kids could be kicked out because I was born in Ireland

it's fucked
 

Willectro

Banned
I am ready to pack my bags and move to Sweden. fuck this shit.

Gotta learn Swedish first. Or was that Finland. One of them requires a language test anyway. lol

Maybe we can convince NordicGAF members to marry us and help us get Swedish green cards. :p

Pretty sure those countries, including Norway and others, are pretty difficult to immigrate to. Their government and population aren't afraid to step on toes and crush entitlement to maintain the status quo. Although Sweden would be cool, I don't feel like it's my god given right to live there, contrary to how some feel about Canada.
 

firehawk12

Subete no aware
They don't have momentum. They never did. We're screwed in 13 days and you had best prepare for it now... or watch the Blue Jays and happily ignore the inevitable outcome.
Harper wins the same time that the Jays are eliminated. Seems like the perfect October surprise.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
Ireland will give citizenship to you if you have one Irish grandparent

So if I was to have kids here in Canada, their kids could be kicked out because I was born in Ireland

it's fucked

Look on the bright side, you have an escape route after October 19!
 
A lot of immigrants dont like other immigrants.

When the Syrian refugee story hit, someone at my work said that the attitude he'd seen a lot of was "On the boat, cut the rope".


Yep, Poilievre floated this last week, too.

Hmmm, no one has posted the new Ekos and Ipsos polls yet? Guessing we're just pouring ourselves some stiff drinks first.

I posted Ipsos yesterday, didn't I -- 33 CPC/32 LPC/26 NDP? As for Ekos, Potato posted the horserace numbers, but here are a few images:
20151006_slide01.png

He still has the Greens a few points above anyone else.


Atlantic Canada is almost at the point of being the Liberals' Alberta. That's one seriously impressive lead.


This is why I'm less questioning of Ekos than I was a few weeks who -- not because it's better for the Liberals (which I do like), but because it has the Liberals beating the Conservatives among women. The CPC usually does worse among women then among men, so for Ekos to be showing the opposite made me skeptical.
 
I posted Ipsos yesterday, didn't I -- 33 CPC/32 LPC/26 NDP? As for Ekos, Potato posted the horserace numbers, but here are a few images:

So we're pretty much Moderate Conservative Minority Territory?

I do wonder what these numbers would turn into seat-wise though, I'm assuming
Atlantic Canada will go mostly Liberals
Quebec, despite their numbers will likely get half the seats because of distribution
Ontario will split evenly Conservative and Liberals with a sprinkle of NDP
Praries will go Conservative with a sprinkle of NDP or Liberal
BC will go Conservative in the interior, NDP/Liberal in the cities and 2-4 Green.
 

mo60

Member
Does anyone think the CPC will get burned hard in future elections if they continue to focus on race issues like the niqab like what happened to the republicans in the US. Maybe this election is setting the stage for that to happened in the future
 

Walpurgis

Banned
I know you're being facetious, but that's basically correct. Older men and high school-educated men are the Conservative base, largely.

In grade 11, we had some school project where we had to go and poll everyone around the school for which party they would vote for if there were an election. The students were overwhelmingly NDP/Liberal and the staff were the same. There was one encounter that stuck out to me. I went to poll the school janitor (old white man) and he said he would vote Conservative. He explained his reason and it was something about a gun registry. It was in the afternoon and what he was saying made me a little uncomfortable so I kind of zoned out. While he was talking, I noticed a strong smell coming from his mouth. Several years later, I discovered that this was the smell of alcohol.
 
So we're pretty much Moderate Conservative Minority Territory?

I do wonder what these numbers would turn into seat-wise though, I'm assuming
Atlantic Canada will go mostly Liberals
Quebec, despite their numbers will likely get half the seats because of distribution
Ontario will split evenly Conservative and Liberals with a sprinkle of NDP
Praries will go Conservative with a sprinkle of NDP or Liberal
BC will go Conservative in the interior, NDP/Liberal in the cities and 2-4 Green.

Assuming that the Ekos numbers are true, it would still likely mean that the NDP take over 50% of the seats in QC as most of the CPC and LPC support is concentrated in fewer seats (CPC in Quebec City and regions, and LPC in Montreal). The Bloc would likely pick up 3-5 seats as well, maybe more. Vote splitting may work to the NDP's advantage in QC.

In BC you'd likely see the NDP and LPC take roughly equal amounts, with the CPC taking less (but still a decent amount). In AB they'll take the same as 2011, but since there are more seats you will see some go LPC and NDP.

In SK you'll see the NDP pick up a few, and the CPC will win most (with 1 LPC). So maybe 3 NDP, 1 LPC, and 9-10 CPC. Not sure of MB, but looks like a few more LPC seats than last time in Winnipeg.

In ON you will see the LPC pick up 25-35 more seats than last time, and the NDP will likely stay roughly where they were before, but the CPC will still take more seats than anyone else. In Atlantic Canada you'll see the LPC take most of them.

Probably 135-150 seats for the CPC at the 35% mark.
 

mo60

Member
IPolitics - Conservative candidate muses about deporting Mulcair under C-24
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyelb_RohHY

Sure, he's only doing it in the sense that its only an example, but that was a stupid choice of examples. In the right hands, someone could turn that into a powerful ad

Wow. Just wow.I seriously hope they were using this as an example and the CPC doesn't try to tar Mulcair if they create an ad that mentions this.

I also found this.I think what this candidate said is a bit ridiculous and most likely false.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/emmaloop/th...absorb-the-oil?utm_term=.mhX9mpXvl#.bqGmqewGE

A high profile CPC candidate in Quebec is also bragging about taking the most expensive flights now.
http://conservativepartycanada.ca/2...ive-flight-of-the-whole-conservative-cabinet/
 

Walpurgis

Banned
Why does the prairies love CPC that much?

I live in the prairies and I can't really explain it. I think the reason why Manitoba looks so blue is because of rural areas and Brandon. IIRC, Winnipeg is mostly Liberal/NDP.
I feel like I knew what alcohol smelled like by the time I was in the 6th grade, but my family are drinkers.

I'm Muslim so it is forbidden. I learned the smell years later with a homeless guy on the bus or something when my friend told me it was alcohol.
 
It's pretty sad that after all this bullshit, Conservatives only manage to lose 4% in popular vote compared to last time.

Im really hoping all these polls are completely wrong.
 

UberTag

Member
The niqab issue is fucking embarrassing. I can't believe it's something that can even be brought up, let alone actually influence voting.
Fucking embarrassing is putting it mildly. Just let people wear whatever they want to wear. They're not harming anybody. And politicizing it? Ugh.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
It's pretty sad that after all this bullshit, Conservatives only manage to lose 4% in popular vote compared to last time.

Im really hoping all these polls are completely wrong.

I've been done for the past week and have accepted a Conservative win. My question is minority or majority. If it is majority, RIP Canada, it's been good. If it is a minority, I will be watching what the opposition parties do with great interest.
 
Rural AB, SK, and MB vote Conservative because the Conservatives identify as a "values" party, and rural Canadians tend to see themselves as people with traditional values. They are less likely to have university education. They tend to be more fearful of outsiders, homogeneous, church-going, and of lower income. This group used to vote NDP as the western protest vote, and then switched to Reform, and now to the CPC. Now that they've voted CPC a few times they are likely to stay that way (as most people do after voting for a party a few times).

In the cities of Regina and Saskatoon the vote tends to lean NDP with some Liberal as well (more so in Regina). Of the 7 urban ridings in this election (4 Saskatoon, 3 Regina) you're likely going to see 3-4 NDP, 1 LPC, and 2-3 CPC). The north of SK will also likely go NDP or maybe LPC due to the aboriginal vote generally going against the CPC.
 
I've been done for the past week and have accepted a Conservative win. My question is minority or majority. If it is majority, RIP Canada, it's been good. If it is a minority, I will be watching what the opposition parties do with great interest.

To be fair, people thought the US was "done" after Bush won his second term. But Obama has started to undo a lot of things Bush did. And Chretien/Martin undid a lot that Mulroney did too, etc. No matter how much Harper does, the following Liberal government (or maybe NDP, though less likely if they come in 3rd this time) will undo a lot of it.
 

mo60

Member
It's pretty sad that after all this bullshit, Conservatives only manage to lose 4% in popular vote compared to last time.

Im really hoping all these polls are completely wrong.

Even if the CPC wins this election it's pretty much downhill for them after this election. Eventually they will burn enough people that it will be almost impossible or very hard for them to win elections anymore like what happened with the PC party like 20 years ago and the republicans in the US unless they change directions significantly.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
Even if the CPC wins this election it's pretty much downhill for them after this election. Eventually they will burn enough people that it will be almost impossible or very hard for them to win elections anymore like what happened with the PC party like 20 years ago and the republicans in the US unless they change directions significantly.

What happened to the PC 20 years ago?
 
What happened to the PC 20 years ago?

essentially: Mulroney spread the party too thin trying to appeal to too many disparate groups, and this combined with the disaster that was their 1993 campaign (as well as a few other factors, like the GST's implementation and the recession of the early '90s) to basically annihilate the PCs
 

Willectro

Banned
The niqab issue is fucking embarrassing. I can't believe it's something that can even be brought up, let alone actually influence voting.

I think it's a pissing match and I'm not sure why anyone is surprised that Harper would run with this. I'm still not entirely convinced either way. As Divvy said in another thread, it's not law. I'm torn between why the government would waste time on something that doesn't impact the average citizens day to day life if someone covers their face during the oath. On the other hand, I always remove my hat during the national anthem. It's not law, but it's something that respectful citizens seem to do, and I think the oath is very much in the same vein. It just comes off to me as entitlement to not comply with a request during a citizenship oath (to an amazing country) and never have to deal with it again. I would do terrible, awful shit to get Canadian citizenship. This just doesn't seem like a big deal either way. I sincerely hope that a separate law isn't required for each and every facet of day to day life in Canada so that people will be respectful to the country.

Does it explicitly say in any religious texts that this is the case?
 

mo60

Member
What happened to the PC 20 years ago?

In the 1993 election they dropped like 152 seats to 2 seats. It literally took years of pissing people off for them to get that many seats. In the areas they were strong in like Quebec. they lost those areas completely to other parties like the BQ, LPC and Reform. Kim campbell didn't really help the PC party either and their actual campaign in 1993 was a disaster. They also mocked the Liberal leader personally in an ad during the campaign and they burned even more support.External factors like the 1990 recession hurt them also.There is a chance that a PC style collapse or a collapse to pre-2004 levels could be in the CPC's future.
 
D

Deleted member 126221

Unconfirmed Member
It's pretty sad that after all this bullshit, Conservatives only manage to lose 4% in popular vote compared to last time.

We really are a minority here; most people don't follow politics at all and only vote for the person they "like" the most. Look likeable, say what people want to hear, have some catchy slogans, and you're done.

Conservatives have easy to understand promises: protect you from the dangerous baddies, protect the canadian traditions from those weird foreigners who want to have things their way, and a STRONG economy which means more money in your pockets.

The other parties' positions are not as easy to summarize or as "striking", so it sticks less with the uninformed population.

Conservatives have the best "marketing" skills, and that's all they needed. Their Australian strategist must have helped too: I guess this niqab storm in a teacup must come from him.

I wish I wasn't that cynical. :(
 
I think it's a pissing match and I'm not sure why anyone is surprised that Harper would run with this. I'm still not entirely convinced either way. As Divvy said in another thread, it's not law. I'm torn between why the government would waste time on something that doesn't impact the average citizens day to day life if someone covers their face during the oath. On the other hand, I always remove my hat during the national anthem. It's not law, but it's something that respectful citizens seem to do, and I think the oath is very much in the same vein. It just comes off to me as entitlement to not comply with a request during a citizenship oath (to an amazing country) and never have to deal with it again. I would do terrible, awful shit to get Canadian citizenship. This just doesn't seem like a big deal either way. I sincerely hope that a separate law isn't required for each and every facet of day to day life in Canada so that people will be respectful to the country.

Does it explicitly say in any religious texts that this is the case?

No, but it also doesn't say that Christians must wear crucifixes or take time off for Christmas, etc, but those are also considered religious rights.
 

UberTag

Member
Looks like I'll be drinking heavily on the 19th then.
It'll be a golden day for the beer stores. Especially if the Jays get bounced around the same time.
Just consider it a fitting capper for Oktoberfest and plan to call in sick for work the next day thanks to the inevitable hangover.
 

lamaroo

Unconfirmed Member
We really are a minority here; most people don't follow politics at all and only vote for the person they "like" the most. Look likeable, say what people want to hear, have some catchy slogans, and you're done.

Conservatives have easy to understand promises: protect you from the dangerous baddies, protect the canadian traditions from those weird foreigners who want to have things their way, and a STRONG economy which means more money in your pockets.

The other parties' positions are not as easy to summarize or as "striking", so it sticks less with the uninformed population.

Conservatives have the best "marketing" skills, and that's all they needed. Their Australian strategist must have helped too: I guess this niqab storm in a teacup must come from him.

I wish I wasn't that cynical. :(

LESS TAXES

People hear that and it makes them stupid.
 

Willectro

Banned
No, but it also doesn't say that Christians must wear crucifixes or take time off for Christmas, etc, but those are also considered religious rights.

I'm atheist, so you're preaching to the choir (lol). There is a crazy amount of religious shit that is tolerated but isn't documented or proven to be the specific wishes of the deity. Also helps that the majority of Canadians are Christian. I wonder which religion supports Harper the most?
 
Let's say that Quebec does end up dumping the NDP and the Block win 10 seats and the CPC win 10-12 as well, getting a majority, all over the niqab issue. So what happens when the issue is firmly decided by the Supreme Court against Harper and they rule a person can wear them wherever they want, including ceremonies, court, workplace, etc? Will Quebec regret putting a Conservative government back in power?
 

Vamphuntr

Member
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/can...-candidate-jagdish-grewal-gay-youth-1.3259324

Wow this is pretty disgusting.

A Conservative candidate in suburban Toronto is defending therapies that attempt to turn gays straight, having penned an editorial that referred to homosexuality as "unnatural behaviour" and heterosexuals as "normal."

Jagdish Grewal, running in Mississauga-Malton, wrote an editorial in the Punjabi Post earlier this year entitled "Is it wrong for a homosexual to become a normal person?"

Grewal writes in the piece that some psychologists blame a "shock" during childhood for causing a person to become gay, but that the change "can be corrected."

"The political competition of today raises the question of whether any person's wish to become a normal person is wrong?" Grewal wrote in Punjabi.

"If it is a parent's right to set guidelines for their children in terms of their education, career and health, then why is it illegal for them to strengthen their natural heterosexuality?"

A campaign pamphlet recently spotted in the riding, with the fine print "Authorized by the official agent for Jagdish Grewal," features a picture of Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau and Ontario Kathleen Wynne at the Toronto Pride parade. The slogan reads, "Are these the priorities of your family?"

In another picture, a piece of paper is superimposed onto Bains' hand. The paper reads "Liberal priorities: Sex Education, Gay Marriage, Legalize Marijuana and Prostitution."
 

Walpurgis

Banned
Let's say that Quebec does end up dumping the NDP and the Block win 10 seats and the CPC win 10-12 as well, getting a majority, all over the niqab issue. So what happens when the issue is firmly decided by the Supreme Court against Harper and they rule a person can wear them wherever they want, including ceremonies, court, workplace, etc? Will Quebec regret putting a Conservative government back in power?

They probably won't even notice.
 
D

Deleted member 126221

Unconfirmed Member
Let's say that Quebec does end up dumping the NDP and the Block win 10 seats and the CPC win 10-12 as well, getting a majority, all over the niqab issue. So what happens when the issue is firmly decided by the Supreme Court against Harper and they rule a person can wear them wherever they want, including ceremonies, court, workplace, etc? Will Quebec regret putting a Conservative government back in power?

What's up with this narrative that this niqab circus is the only thing Quebec cares about, or that it only has any effect on polls in Quebec? I must be living in an alternate reality, because the numbers show me that Quebec is far from being the only place drinking the conservative kool aid (with some provinces drinking a lot more of it than we do).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom