Zombie James
Banned
New Ekos:
Liberal 33.5%
Conservative 32.6%
NDP 22.9%
Green 5.6%
Bloc 3.8%
Liberals down half a point, Conservatives are up three (almost all at the expense of the NDP, it seems).
That makes no sense.
New Ekos:
Liberal 33.5%
Conservative 32.6%
NDP 22.9%
Green 5.6%
Bloc 3.8%
Liberals down half a point, Conservatives are up three (almost all at the expense of the NDP, it seems).
New Ekos:
Liberal 33.5%
Conservative 32.6%
NDP 22.9%
Green 5.6%
Bloc 3.8%
Liberals down half a point, Conservatives are up three (almost all at the expense of the NDP, it seems).
New Ekos:
Liberal 33.5%
Conservative 32.6%
NDP 22.9%
Green 5.6%
Bloc 3.8%
Liberals down half a point, Conservatives are up three (almost all at the expense of the NDP, it seems).
Presumably, it's NDP voters changing to Liberal and Liberal voters changing to CPC as they see the momentum shift.New Ekos:
Liberal 33.5%
Conservative 32.6%
NDP 22.9%
Green 5.6%
Bloc 3.8%
Liberals down half a point, Conservatives are up three (almost all at the expense of the NDP, it seems).
Ha! Yeah, it's a little crass ... although I do think it emphasizes the issues of regional politics in this country.And here I thought only Québec was bigoted...! xD
Nothing turns me off a political candidate (or anything for that matter... movie, TV show, potential girlfriend) than insulting my intelligence.One of the good discussions in this episode is the NDP’s absurd recent talking point that they only need 35 more seats to win and they’re the best placed to defeat Harper. This is clearly not true and both the Strategists heavily criticize the NDP for this stupid campaign tactic. It just looks desperate and Canadians are too smart to fall for this crap.
That's good advice that I doubt will be listened to. It's a real shame because we're going to lose some phenomenal NDP MPs from Parliament at the expense of some terrible and ill-equipped Liberal MPs just to help ensure Harper gets ousted.What I thought was interesting is that one of the podcast guests suggested that what he would have done instead was to emphasize incumbency, and talk about how the NDP have a lot of great MPs that need to be supported and kept around. I agree that would be the best approach for the NDP to take at this point. Go regional and talk about the great MPs you have and try to retain BC and Quebec.
There's a pretty strong appeal for people who want to smoke marijuana and not risk getting arrested for it (the risk of that being low, of course, but it's still there, and that's a deterrent for many).I don't think so. There's probably some of that, but it's not like weed is so hard to get in other states that you'd need to travel to Colorado to get it.
The Conservatives have been going very hard after the Jewish vote (see also, but with much less success, Mount Royal), and in Thornhill, at least, it seems to have worked.![]()
Why is Thornhill such a bastion of conservatism? And I think it's specifically social conservatism, considering that's where the worst of the sexed outcry came from too.
I first saw that talking point in a profile of Peggy Nash's campaign in Parkdale-High Park, and it struck me as a pretty strained one, since it would only work on very low-information voters, but even low-information voters would be able to divine from news reports that the Liberals are now polling way ahead of the NDP.One of the good discussions in this episode is the NDPs absurd recent talking point that they only need 35 more seats to win and theyre the best placed to defeat Harper. This is clearly not true and both the Strategists heavily criticize the NDP for this stupid campaign tactic. It just looks desperate and Canadians are too smart to fall for this crap.
New Ekos:
Liberal 33.5%
Conservative 32.6%
NDP 22.9%
Green 5.6%
Bloc 3.8%
Liberals down half a point, Conservatives are up three (almost all at the expense of the NDP, it seems).
In some parts of the country (rural BC, for instance, and parts of Quebec) it is a choice between the Tories and NDP. But it's also possible that the NDP are bleeding to the Liberals while the Liberals are bleeding to the Tories, for instance.That makes me cringe. NDP to Conservatives? Wat.
When has Ekos ever made sense?That makes no sense.
EKOS has consistently been the most favourable pollster for the Tories so far in this campaign, for what it's worth (could be right, could be wrong).
Is there any chance that TransCanada might have hurt its interests by trying to make the Liberals look bad with the leaked lobbying email, if the Liberals form government?
Who said that?Doubtful, but if you believe the NDP supporters, it's the turnaround that will cause Tom to form a super majority.
Who said that?
True, but Mainstreet is also claiming their polling now projects a Liberal majority, which puts it on the opposite end of the poll spectrum.Mainstreet's polls for the National Post have been waaaaay more favorable for the Conservatives.
If that was what the Liberals thought they did, I doubt it would help them.Is there any chance that TransCanada might have hurt its interests by trying to make the Liberals look bad with the leaked lobbying email, if the Liberals form government?
I don't think anyone tried to make it into some big issue that would take down the Liberals. I just expressed my disappointment.It's hyperbole based on how some of you want to drum this up as if it's a giant issue.
UghBack to panic mode.
Looking at their regional numbers, the only massive difference is that they had Manitoba at 46% Conservative in their last poll, but 60% Conservative in this poll, and the NDP dropping from 13% to 2% (LOL). That's with their terribly low sample size.
But they have Conservatives up in Ontario as well, from 46% - 28% (Lib - Cons) in the last poll, to 43% - 33% in this poll.
Embarrassing seeing my hometown Burlington as the noticeable blue blip off the lake sandwiched by orange/red.
But wow I'm actually shocked the projection has Liberals pretty even now (41.0 - 40.3). Last times I checked Cons were usually up 10 points. I know my dad voted early this Monday for Libs, as he despises Harper. Mom's gonna go election day, and until then she's even trying to convince her oldest work friend who's voting Cons because of her husband or something.
... Now I'm sad that I'm registered for here at York (99% Liberal projection), even though my drivers license has my Burlington address on it... Burlington needs meeeeeeee
I think it's possible that some people decide in the voting booth. At least one political strategist on the Strategists podcast thinks so.
Speaking of that, there's a new Strategists Podcast that came out yesterday! I discovered this podcast this election and I think it’s worth a listen. It’s two professional political strategists talking about strategy, and it’s pretty funny and entertaining. If you’re a big enough politics nerd to still be in this thread talking about this election after all this time you’ll probably enjoy it.
One of the good discussions in this episode is the NDP’s absurd recent talking point that they only need 35 more seats to win and they’re the best placed to defeat Harper. This is clearly not true and both the Strategists heavily criticize the NDP for this stupid campaign tactic. It just looks desperate and Canadians are too smart to fall for this crap.
What I thought was interesting is that one of the podcast guests suggested that what he would have done instead was to emphasize incumbency, and talk about how the NDP have a lot of great MPs that need to be supported and kept around. I agree that would be the best approach for the NDP to take at this point. Go regional and talk about the great MPs you have and try to retain BC and Quebec.
Stemming from that idea, if we are to talk about potential upsets, I think a pretty big upset would be if some “safe” NDP held seats in Quebec and BC flip to the Liberals. Similarly it would be an upset if the Liberals do phenomenally well in taking Conservative seats, but surprisingly few NDP seats change hands.
I think one of the big storylines of election night will be whether it’s the “Trudeau Election” or “the ABC Election.” Will Canadians overwhelmingly support the Liberals as the best agent of change or will they more pragmatically support “ABC,” including the NDP, in order to simply not elect Conservatives.
Looking at the riding history, Paddy Torsney recorded a remarkably consistent 43-45% of the vote in Burlington in her four wins there from 1993-2004, before losing in 2006-2008 with lower totals in the 30s. It's not outside the realm of possibility for the Liberals to win there, though the recent trends obviously haven't been in the party's favour.Embarrassing seeing my hometown Burlington as the noticeable blue blip off the lake sandwiched by orange/red.
But wow I'm actually shocked the projection has Liberals pretty even now (41.0 - 40.3). Last times I checked Cons were usually up 10 points. I know my dad voted early this Monday for Libs, as he despises Harper. Mom's gonna go election day, and until then she's even trying to convince her oldest work friend who's voting Cons because of her husband or something.
... Now I'm sad that I'm registered for here at York (99% Liberal projection), even though my drivers license has my Burlington address on it... Burlington needs meeeeeeee
Sigh
I'll let you guys in on a secret. Notice how the "b" of "bq" is just the "p" of "pq" flipped upside-down? The bq is, in fact, an undercover branch of the pq. They have a strong hate of canadians and the english language and are secretly working on a parasite that only infects english speakers, to wipe the english language from the face of the earth.
Looking at the riding history, Paddy Torsney recorded a remarkably consistent 43-45% of the vote in Burlington in her four wins there from 1993-2004, before losing in 2006-2008 with lower totals in the 30s. It's not outside the realm of possibility for the Liberals to win there, though the recent trends obviously haven't been in the party's favour.
but i live in toronto danforthAt this point by voting NDP you're electing Harper.
People really need to wake the fuck up and start doing the maths.
At this point by voting NDP you're electing Harper.
People really need to wake the fuck up and start doing the maths.
CPC yes, BQ no, and equating the two as being the same is patently ridiculous. I'm not remotely a Bloc supporter but come on.You really don't think that the CPC and BQ are racist...?
At this point by voting NDP you're electing Harper.
People really need to wake the fuck up and start doing the maths.
and what if liberals have no chance of winning in my riding
For someone demanding people do math, you clearly have no idea how it works.
308 has Mulcair surviving in Outremont
The Star has Mulcair losing Outremont.
hmmm
That's really not how it works. There are a good many ridings where the NDP can win and the Liberals can't.At this point by voting NDP you're electing Harper.
People really need to wake the fuck up and start doing the maths.
I agree. The Star's riding percentages are implausible in a lot of cases.I think the Star is wrong and 308 is close in this instance.
At this point by voting NDP you're electing Harper.
People really need to wake the fuck up and start doing the maths.
I'm probably going back home in the next year but if I end up staying here in Canada I really don't want to live under Harper.
France is turning to shit, Canada is turning to shit. Everywhere I go is turning to shit.
What's with all the urination-themed candidate gaffes this election?
Here's another crazy candidate for you GAF. This one peed in public between two handshakes with voters.
CPC? LPC? NDP? Green? BQ?
Answer here
The situation is actually the opposite in my riding, which has historically been NDP. Last election a CPC nobody managed to sneak in but the Liberals have never had a chance here. People watching the news in my riding may think they should vote Liberal but by doing that, they would be electing a CPC MP.At this point by voting NDP you're electing Harper.
People really need to wake the fuck up and start doing the maths.
I'm probably going back home in the next year but if I end up staying here in Canada I really don't want to live under Harper.
France is turning to shit, Canada is turning to shit. Everywhere I go is turning to shit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVE-N-htzKsCPC yes, BQ no, and equating the two as being the same is patently ridiculous. I'm not remotely a Bloc supporter but come on.
For some reason I pictured 2 voters shaking each others hands, and this guy standing right next to them peeing below their handshake.Here's another crazy candidate for you GAF. This one peed in public between two handshakes with voters.
CPC? LPC? NDP? Green? BQ?
Answer here
Obviously look at your riding and vote accordingly but I've met people who are voting NDP " just because " ...
Fucking idiots.
Come on you know what I meant. I've been reading this thread for weeks (without posting). I'm not that dumb.
Hmm, Essex. There was an Environics poll recently that had the NDP one point behind the CPC, so your vote may indeed elect your preferred candidate.So a CPC representitive for Jeff Watson, our current Conservative MP came to the door. I tried to shoo him away with the good-ol "We're not voting this year" quip, but he jumped into the "This is the most important election of all time" speech, touting the Conservative lies of the Liberals and NDP going to raise our taxes and put injection sites on our block.
...I was screaming inside, I wanted to call him out on it, but I couldn't. I didn't even have it in me to say we already voted NDP.
Don't you live in Quebec? Voting NDP is the strategic vote in 59 out of 78 ridings there. Either way, Conservatives don't really have much of a chance in most of Quebec. The only non-Conservative "Harper party" there is the Bloc. All the Bloc can do is serve as a coalition spoiler and keep Harper in power, and they will also vote down PR.
Hmm, Essex. There was an Environics poll recently that had the NDP one point behind the CPC, so your vote may indeed elect your preferred candidate.
you are so wrong on so many levels, the Bloc is not an ABC party. The Bloc is a Conservative enabler
If you are on the Island of Montreal or suburbs of Montreal and Laval. Conservatives are a ZERO threat in the area, So voting Liberal would be the more logical choice in the Greater Montreal area to send a plurality of Liberal MPs to ensure government.
Conservatives are a threat in Quebec City, Sagenay and the way up to Beauce and Riviere-du-Loup.
Correct.I'm assuming that's L/C/N
Sounds kind of... shady.The Liberals and New Democrats have declined an offer from the Privy Council Office to attend a confidential briefing just days before the federal election to learn more details of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, saying the meeting was offered at the "last minute" and would still leave Canadians "in the dark."
Wow... CPC is getting desperate.
Liberals, NDP decline PCO offer of confidential briefing on TPP trade deal
Sounds kind of... shady.