• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Canadian General Election (OT) - #elxn42: October 19, 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.

is-that-so-cmcvq3.jpg
 

Sean C

Member
Is the general assumption here that the Liberals will win? I still think a lot of people are in for a very bad surprise on monday... I hope I'm wrong, of course.
Based on what? Sure, the polls could all be wrong; but I don't see any particular reason to assume that as the starting point.

Beyond which, unless Harper gets a majority, which I am comfortable saying is impossible, he's out as PM. The specific results of a minority parliament will only dictate how speedily he departs.
 
Actually 308 gives the Liberals an 18 seat advantage over the Conservatives mostly because of Ontario now.

I'm referring to the ranges. 100-141 for Conservatives, 110-151 for the Liberals. Conservatives max out at 187, Liberals max out at 169 (cusp of majority). If you take margin of error into account, it's still very much a tie.

I don't think 308 added the latest Nanos poll though. That might change things up.

Does Harper really think attaching these lunatics to his campaign is in any way a good idea?

Ford Nation is dead. John Tory is a very popular mayor for both sides of the political spectrum. Harper's getting very desperate.
 

TheOMan

Tagged as I see fit

LOL - The Ford kiss of death. Guess the Liberals are gonna have this handed to them, but I definitely expect some voting irregularities (read cheating) to show up.

Edit:
Tories backtracking on pledge to provide TPP text before election: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...ide-tpp-text-before-election/article26823472/

Not surprising in any way, shape, or form.
 

subrock

Member
Does Harper really think attaching these lunatics to his campaign is in any way a good idea?

When you are only going for 30% of the electorate I think going for the crazies is a good strategy. It's like when you see polls in the states there's always 20% of people that believe something insane:

Is Obama a muslin 20% YES
Does God walk among us 20% YES
Jet fuel can't melt steel 20% YES.

Just need 10% more and you've got a lock.


love that he says Tom Mulclair. That guy is totally with it.
 

mo60

Member
LOL - The Ford kiss of death. Guess the Liberals are gonna have this handed to them, but I definitely expect some voting irregularities (read cheating) to show up.

I don't think anyone within the conservative party is dumb enough to try cheating again. Maybe a rouge conservative staffer if we are unlucky like last election.And unless the conservatives get closer to the Liberals in Ontario they won't win.
 

Joeku

Member
When you are only going for 30% of the electorate I think going for the crazies is a good strategy. It's like when you see polls in the states there's always 20% of people that believe something insane:

Is Obama a muslin 20% YES
Does God walk among us 20% YES
Jet fuel can't melt steel 20% YES.

Just need 10% more and you've got a lock.



love that he says Tom Mulclair. That guy is totally with it.

Tom McClair, leader of the NPD.
 

IceIpor

Member
I don't think anyone within the conservative party is dumb enough to try cheating again. Maybe a rouge conservative staffer if we are unlucky like last election.

I would like to believe this, but I'm afraid of other things as well, such as if the CPC gets kicked out, a bunch of files/deals/paperwork suddenly goes missing as we transition over.
 

TheOMan

Tagged as I see fit
I don't think anyone within the conservative party is dumb enough to try cheating again. Maybe a rouge conservative staffer if we are unlucky like last election.

You're waaaaay more optimistic than I am...and give them too much credit.
 

mo60

Member
I would like to believe this, but I'm afraid of other things as well, such as if the CPC gets kicked out, a bunch of files/deals/paperwork suddenly goes missing as we transition over.

I'm kinda scared of that to.I hope that does not happen.
 

Joeku

Member
Did you happen to read the excerpt from the book by one Rob Ford's ex staff member? That was some horrifyingly funny read.

I have, yes. And I live in a suburb outside Toronto, so that coupled with some people who really are part of the Ford Nation makes me shake my fucking head. A stain on this country. Of course they'd get tied up with the Cons nationally. Of course.
 
[Put on tinfoil hat]That was totally staged[Take off tinfoil hat]

Nah, Trudeau had a similar response to Energy East protesters when they interrupted one of his events last year. People started booing, but he shut them down and told the protesters they could have the floor while they said what they wanted to say, on the condition they not disrupt the rest of the event. I think his teaching background makes him more equipped to handle those distractions than most people.

Is the general assumption here that the Liberals will win? I still think a lot of people are in for a very bad surprise on monday... I hope I'm wrong, of course.

Like I said a few pages ago: I'm thinking the Liberals and Conservatives basically end up tied in seat count. Even if the Liberals are ahead in the polls, the last few elections have shown that polls understate Conservative support and overstate Liberal/NDP support.


Zero self-awareness.

And that is half the battle. of course having to say 'Prime Minister Justin Kenney' causes bile to rise in my throat

But yeah even if he won another majority Harper would have to make an exit. Kenney's too toxic even for the cons I think. Ol' Skippy is more likely to takeover.

Skippy as in Poilievre? He's probably even more toxic than Kenney. A year ago Kenney probably would've had the inside track, but I think his dismal performance as Defense Minister has tanked his chances. I really don't know who follows Harper. I think Rona Ambrose makes a run at the job. If Lisa Raitt wins in Halton, I could see her having supporters. Apparently Jean Charest is considering it, if Twitter is to be believed. Doug Ford is also talking about it. Two dark horse candidates: Kellie Leitch and Maxime Bernier. I've heard rumours of a Draft Leitch movement, and Paul Wells has been saying for years that Bernier is someone to watch. Maybe Mackay or Moore return to politics?
 

Sean C

Member
Maybe Mackay or Moore return to politics?
I think that if either of them were going to do that they wouldn't have retired this election. Assuming Harper won, he would have retired probably around 2 years into his term, to make way for a successor. Everybody always thought this would be his last campaign, one way or another.

If anything, I'd say the current scenario makes them running even less likely, since it would require them to jump into the race pretty much immediately after leaving the House, which would look silly.
 
How much are people expecting tax revenue from legal marijuana to be?

I can't really imagine it'd be some huge amount.

Well, considering Marijuana is a party drug which can be used in Medicinal applications, I'd assume it would bring in more than Cigarettes, though less than Alcohol.
 

Prax

Member
I am kind of scared of the disaster waiting for cleanup in the office and then somehow the Liberals or coalition not being able to fulfill many of their campaign promises because of it..
But here's hoping it will be a smooth transition!

I'm personally hoping for a Liberal majority so things can get done quickly.
 

Azih

Member
Too soon for this talk but I'm telling you guys that Conservatives who want to be the next leader either weren't with the Harper conservatives or got out to keep the stink of failure off of them.

Baird may come back. Bernard Lord will almost certainly try.
 
I think there's zero chance it's Baird. Too many skeletons in his closet, and I don't think the social conservatives are *that* accepting.

I think that if either of them were going to do that they wouldn't have retired this election. Assuming Harper won, he would have retired probably around 2 years into his term, to make way for a successor. Everybody always thought this would be his last campaign, one way or another.

If anything, I'd say the current scenario makes them running even less likely, since it would require them to jump into the race pretty much immediately after leaving the House, which would look silly.

I've always thought they both jumped ship now because they thought it was going to be a losing campaign, and didn't want to be stuck with the stench of failure. It may look a little silly if they return so quickly, but all they have to say is that they heard the call from their party and their country and they diffuse that. I know they both have young kids (and one with an illness or a disability in Moore's case, if I'm not mistaken), but I can't imagine they're both gone from public life for good.
 

Divvy

Canadians burned my passport
well isn't that because other citizens from outside that state are going in there to buy

it would likely be more spread out if all states legalized it

I don't think so. There's probably some of that, but it's not like weed is so hard to get in other states that you'd need to travel to Colorado to get it.
 

Tiktaalik

Member
Based on what? Sure, the polls could all be wrong; but I don't see any particular reason to assume that as the starting point.

I guess the big unknown is the "undecided" voter category. The latest Nanos has that at 9%. Not sure that number is big enough for big upsets, but it would certainly decide close contests.

You'd think they'd be the most likely to go with whoever appears to have the momentum (Liberals) or very likely to just stick with the incumbent of their riding.
 
I guess the big unknown is the "undecided" voter category. The latest Nanos has that at 9%. Not sure that number is big enough for big upsets, but it would certainly decide close contests.

You'd think they'd be the most likely to go with whoever appears to have the momentum (Liberals) or very likely to just stick with the incumbent of their riding.

I think at this point, we should assume anyone still telling pollsters they're not voting is most likely not voting, but too embarrassed by that to actually admit it. That's the general rule in every election, so it seems safe to apply it here, too.
 

Divvy

Canadians burned my passport
cK35uVA.png


Why is Thornhill such a bastion of conservatism? And I think it's specifically social conservatism, considering that's where the worst of the sexed outcry came from too.
 
Why is Thornhill such a bastion of conservatism? And I think it's specifically social conservatism, considering that's where the worst of the sexed outcry came from too.

Haha, naw. Thornhill != Thorncliffe :p

Thornhill is upper-middle income suburb, and also has a large Jewish community. Conservatives have good ground game there. Liberals came very close to unseating them in the provincial election last year, I can see them winning this time around since the gulf between Lib-Cons is bigger this election.

It has Newmarket as blue. I don't think that'll happen, that one's most likely red. Burlington might also go red.

---

Speaking of Thorncliffe, anyone realize that Harper just totally torpedoed the provincial Conservatives chances? Recently arrived, socially conservative Muslims was all Patrick Brown had going for him. Now they've sworn off the Conservative brand forever. Now all he has are white rural homophobes. Not exactly a big group.
 

Divvy

Canadians burned my passport
Haha, naw. Thornhill != Thorncliffe :p

Thornhill is upper-middle income suburb, and also has a large Jewish community. Conservatives have good ground game there. Liberals came very close to unseating them in the provincial election last year, I can see them winning this time around since the gulf between Lib-Cons is bigger this election.

It has Newmarket as blue. I don't think that'll happen, that one's definitely red. Burlington might also go red.

Oh I thought the hubbub was from Thornhill, my bad.

I forgot about the Jewish community in Thornhill, that's probably why. I'm mostly used to the eastern side of it where it's a lower income, immigrant community.
 

Mailbox

Member
I guess the big unknown is the "undecided" voter category. The latest Nanos has that at 9%. Not sure that number is big enough for big upsets, but it would certainly decide close contests.

You'd think they'd be the most likely to go with whoever appears to have the momentum (Liberals) or very likely to just stick with the incumbent of their riding.

You also have to take into account that those 9% unknown could very well not vote at all. It's most likely not going to be 9% addition total towards any party; maybe 4-5% tops
 
You also have to take into account that those 9% unknown could very well not vote at all. It's most likely not going to be 9% addition total towards any party; maybe 4-5% tops

The most likely outcome is that those who do vote will do so along similar lines as those already decided.
 

Maximus.

Member
Staged or not, that's very refreshing after all these conservative years (I can't believe I'm cheering for something that should be natural, but here we are).

Speaking of pot legalization, how likely is it to happen in the first term? I might be too cynical but I just can't see it happening any time soon, even under a liberal government...

Well with a minority government, it may be tough to do a lot of things they want :/ Hope the NDP will be willing to help them out when necessary.
 

Morrigan Stark

Arrogant Smirk
my first language is other, I learned both French and English at the same time during preschool and kindergarten.

I'm one of those bilingual Montrealers who likes to point out difference in Frederal Party leaders' speeches who say one thing in English then say something else completely different in French (*cough* Mulcair)
Only you could turn a simple "are you a French or English native speaker" question and turn it into a political anti-Mulcair mud-singling statement, LOL

Hey gutter, what time is it?

"It's 4:11 PM, the time where Mulcair said one thing in French which contradicted what he said same time last week in English"

I see haha. I was just wondering because I have yet to meet any French first language Quebecois so openly opposed to the Bloc and PQ.
I am a French speaker and never voted Bloc or PQ.

[*]Regional politics is a factor as well. I've heard things like: "Ontario doesn't care about farmers." and "We don't need another Prime Minister from Québec."
And here I thought only Québec was bigoted...! xD
 

Tiktaalik

Member
If some people are still undecided then those people aren't voting.

I think it's possible that some people decide in the voting booth. At least one political strategist on the Strategists podcast thinks so.

Speaking of that, there's a new Strategists Podcast that came out yesterday! I discovered this podcast this election and I think it’s worth a listen. It’s two professional political strategists talking about strategy, and it’s pretty funny and entertaining. If you’re a big enough politics nerd to still be in this thread talking about this election after all this time you’ll probably enjoy it.

One of the good discussions in this episode is the NDP’s absurd recent talking point that they only need 35 more seats to win and they’re the best placed to defeat Harper. This is clearly not true and both the Strategists heavily criticize the NDP for this stupid campaign tactic. It just looks desperate and Canadians are too smart to fall for this crap.

What I thought was interesting is that one of the podcast guests suggested that what he would have done instead was to emphasize incumbency, and talk about how the NDP have a lot of great MPs that need to be supported and kept around. I agree that would be the best approach for the NDP to take at this point. Go regional and talk about the great MPs you have and try to retain BC and Quebec.

Stemming from that idea, if we are to talk about potential upsets, I think a pretty big upset would be if some “safe” NDP held seats in Quebec and BC flip to the Liberals. Similarly it would be an upset if the Liberals do phenomenally well in taking Conservative seats, but surprisingly few NDP seats change hands.

I think one of the big storylines of election night will be whether it’s the “Trudeau Election” or “the ABC Election.” Will Canadians overwhelmingly support the Liberals as the best agent of change or will they more pragmatically support “ABC,” including the NDP, in order to simply not elect Conservatives.
 

Apathy

Member
Can Gretzky even vote?

"I support a man that is literally taking away my right as a Canadian expatriate to vote in future elections, go team Harper"

He should be ashamed. If i want hockey strategy, I'll ask him, but concerning politics hes near the bottom of the list.
 
cK35uVA.png


Why is Thornhill such a bastion of conservatism? And I think it's specifically social conservatism, considering that's where the worst of the sexed outcry came from too.

Embarrassing seeing my hometown Burlington as the noticeable blue blip off the lake sandwiched by orange/red.

But wow I'm actually shocked the projection has Liberals pretty even now (41.0 - 40.3). Last times I checked Cons were usually up 10 points. I know my dad voted early this Monday for Libs, as he despises Harper. Mom's gonna go election day, and until then she's even trying to convince her oldest work friend who's voting Cons because of her husband or something.


... Now I'm sad that I'm registered for here at York (99% Liberal projection), even though my drivers license has my Burlington address on it... Burlington needs meeeeeeee
 
New Ekos:

Liberal 33.5%
Conservative 32.6%
NDP 22.9%
Green 5.6%
Bloc 3.8%

Liberals down half a point, Conservatives are up three (almost all at the expense of the NDP, it seems).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom