TheRealTalker
Banned
Well a bunch of African Nations speak French and as their economies grow rapidly we can see an new interest in learning French for future business relations and like France get ahead start
GDP powerhouse and ending those equalization payments. Glorious. 4 western provinces and the 3 territories would make a nice, rich country.
But I think we should just keep the Canada name. They can call themselves Quebtario or whatever the hell they want.
Pretty sure they didn't select Tamil as our official language.
In gaboumafou's defence, Africa will experience the most economic growth in the next century. It would benefit Canadians to be able to speak the same language as them.
It just so happens that somehow, they happen to choose your culture and your language.
*unless you live in QuebecJust giving my perspective. I like our country because we don't prioritize one culture over another, allow anyone speak any language they want, and practice any faith they want.
We should be using immigration to create a 5th and 6th world class city in Canada (out of Vancouver, Calgary (the newest member over last decade), Ontario, and Montreal). One of the Atlantic and one of the prairie cities needs to become a world class city.
Steve and Gilles understood that the party was over, they went home
But Tom, Tom. Tom has to be "that guy" who overextends his stay after a party is over when everyone else already went home.
Justin will have to kick Tom out of the house.
Anyone know what happens with lawn signs? Like does someone come take this away or do I need to call?
Apparently there's a petition for Elizabeth May to be the Minister of the Environment.
Hells naw
who do you guys think is going to be the best choice for Finance Minister
Alright, so my predictions that I can recall were:
✓ Liberals would win
✖ A Minority
✓ Mulcair wouldn't resign
✓ Mulcair would win Outremont
✖ Harper wouldn't resign
✖ Turnout around 60% (68%)
✖ Edmonton Centre would go NDP (first prediction)
✖ Edmonton Centre would go CPC due to vote split (second prediction from last day of polling)
✖ The Bloc wouldn't gain seats (though the fact they did it on splits and not on an increase in vote % makes me happy enough when we're in a majority)
✖ NDP efficiency would be surprisingly good.
✓ CPC efficiency would be surprisingly bad.
✓ Liberal efficiency would be surprisingly good.
Not a great night for my predictions, heh.
What the hell does the NDP do now?
But times change. In Canada, our constitution is a living tree doctrine.
Listening to people say "because that's how we were founded" comes off the same as someone claiming 2nd amendment in the US for their gun ownership rights.
Just giving my perspective. I like our country because we don't prioritize one culture over another, allow anyone speak any language they want, and practice any faith they want.
130 million Africans speak English over 120 million Africans who speak French.
1.5 billion people and our 2nd (or 3rd if you count EU as a whole) largest trading partner speaks Mandarin or Cantonese.
I really want to promote more immigration from China to Canada, because it's a boon to our economy.
That's backwards. They didn't choose my culture and language, my parents learned that culture and language because they chose it. The culture I grew up in was one where we had two official languages.
It might be because english isn't my first language, but I don't understand what this post means at all. I re-read it multiple times and tried to translate it, but I'm still confused.
My culture is a tapestry of European, Asian, and North American cultures
My language is english, the dominant language in our continent and most translate-able to the rest of the modern world due to American Imperialism.
The languages I have been learning or have learned part of are German, French, and Japanese. French because I was forced to take French classes in Canada - I would have preferred to have been taught a different language like German, Mandarin, Cantonese, or Japanese when I was younger.
WTF. That's disturbing and this isn't first time I heard comments like this on GAF.Honestly, the issue between Canada and Quebec, is similar to the North and South of the US. We just never had our civil war for one side to dominate the other for re-unification.
To play devil's advocate, I do find it funny that as a country, we chose to save French culture while we almost systematically destroyed aboriginal culture by taking kids away from families and forcing them to be Christian and to speak English. Talk about "fair" treatment and all that.WTF. That's disturbing and this isn't first time I heard comments like this on GAF.
Yeah, I started learning English around pre-school or Kindergarten. I was born in Montreal and moved to Vancouver when I was 2, but spoke Tamil exclusively until entering school.Speaking exclusively Tamil in Canada must be pretty hard, if you don't want to live completely secluded.
There are probably still a lot of Asian communities where the predominant language is the "home" language. I don't know about Tamil, but if you can communicate in Chinese, you can make a living catering specifically to a Chinese speaking community. This goes not only for bankers, lawyers and doctors, but for tradesmen like plumbers and carpenters as well.Yeah, I started learning English around pre-school or Kindergarten. I was born in Montreal and moved to Vancouver when I was 2, but spoke Tamil exclusively until entering school.
WTF. That's disturbing and this isn't first time I heard comments like this on GAF.
Well except the government of Ontario limiting French instruction in French schools to an hour a day in 1912, and defunded French schools until 1968. We never really decided to "save" French culture until recently. And yes, the treatment of First Nations is way worse, but if we start using that as an excuse for everything, well, we'd be a pretty shitty country.To play devil's advocate, I do find it funny that as a country, we chose to save French culture while we almost systematically destroyed aboriginal culture by taking kids away from families and forcing them to be Christian and to speak English. Talk about "fair" treatment and all that.
Yeah, but the decision to speak english wasn't made randomly. If you immigrate to Alberta, choosing vietnamese or finnish as your new language would not be very wise. You'll go with english because that's what everybody speaks and you want to interact with them.It means our culture and language stems from those decisions, not the other way around.
Should have stopped when I read that comment. I think I'm masochistic...WTF. That's disturbing and this isn't first time I heard comments like this on GAF.
1) French wasn't "saved" out of good will from the conqueror.To play devil's advocate, I do find it funny that as a country, we chose to save French culture while we almost systematically destroyed aboriginal culture by taking kids away from families and forcing them to be Christian and to speak English. Talk about "fair" treatment and all that.
Prime minister-designate Justin Trudeau has promised that Monday’s election would be the final one ever conducted using the traditional first-past-the-post system.
That means the “winner-takes-all” way Canadian voters have always elected their MPs will be changed in time for the 2019 federal campaign.
“It was one of our commitments that this would be the last election based on this process,” Trudeau told reporters in Ottawa on Tuesday.
“We have much work to do, to consult, to be engaged with Canadians, to study the issue so that upcoming elections are indeed done in a different way,” he said in French.
I don't think it was the English being nice to the French but the French fighting back. The difference between Aboriginals fighting back and the French fighting back was that the French knew how to use the system (writing, contracts, governments, etc.). They weren't as easily scammed since they had centuries of experience dealing with the English.To play devil's advocate, I do find it funny that as a country, we chose to save French culture while we almost systematically destroyed aboriginal culture by taking kids away from families and forcing them to be Christian and to speak English. Talk about "fair" treatment and all that.
Trudeau is going to ditch First Past The Post:
http://www.thestar.com/news/federal...reform-looms-for-canada-trudeau-promises.html
Australia has a mixed AV/STV system because it elects its Senate and the Senate has the ability to vote down the budget, which is why the smaller parties have a lot of power.Those are big words. I think Australia's system is still classified as FPTP (it definitely isn't PR) so I hope that is out of the window. If we can get the German system then Trudeau will become a legend of his own.
I don't think it was the English being nice to the French but the French fighting back. The difference between Aboriginals fighting back and the French fighting back was that the French knew how to use the system (writing, contracts, governments, etc.). They weren't as easily scammed since they had centuries of experience dealing with the English.
Those are big words. I think Australia's system is still classified as FPTP (it definitely isn't PR) so I hope that is out of the window. If we can get the German system then Trudeau will become a legend of his own.
I'll just say it's equally "funny" how Canada as a country decided to round up anyone Japanese during WW2 but didn't do the same with German and Italian Canadians.I think it has more to do with the conflict in Canada being a smaller part of a much larger conflict between colonial powers. And both colonial powers had little interest in the wellbeing of what they considered savages.
*unless you live in Quebec
.
Trudeau is going to ditch First Past The Post:
http://www.thestar.com/news/federal...reform-looms-for-canada-trudeau-promises.html
Women aren't allowed to provide or receive public services while wearing the niqab in Quebec.Funny, I'm pretty sure I saw muslims and people speak english the other day...
Nevermind.. must have been my imagination.
Trudeau is going to ditch First Past The Post:
http://www.thestar.com/news/federal...reform-looms-for-canada-trudeau-promises.html
I think Trudeau has a very earnest heart. That may sometimes lead to him becoming overly dramatic and naive seeming, but he has his values in the right place, I think. Though maybe not all of his ideas are as nuanced as people would like or planned out.
What he needs is to be surrounded by is smart, strategically-minded, and dedicated people to guide him and who will help make his campaign promises a reality.
I don't mind so much if he's a puppet leader for his charisma as long as he's smart enough to understand the importance of good information (thankfully, he talks about evidence-based governing a lot) and selecting the right people to help him (I don't know about this part yet, but I like that he's going to try to have a representative cabinet at least gender-wise).
An 18 Year-Old Justin Trudeau on Quebec Sovereignty
I've never seen that before.
"Le Canada ne chie pas sur le Québec!" Haha
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/politics/liberals-map-swift-overhaul-of-anti-terror-law
C-51 getting overhauled ASAP
They're moving even faster than I had hoped
It reads as if they are mostly adding oversight, and clarification on vague terms. They should just get rid of it, but I guess they didn't campaign on that
I think Trudeau has a very earnest heart. That may sometimes lead to him becoming overly dramatic and naive seeming, but he has his values in the right place, I think. Though maybe not all of his ideas are as nuanced as people would like or planned out.
What he needs is to be surrounded by is smart, strategically-minded, and dedicated people to guide him and who will help make his campaign promises a reality.
I don't mind so much if he's a puppet leader for his charisma as long as he's smart enough to understand the importance of good information (thankfully, he talks about evidence-based governing a lot) and selecting the right people to help him (I don't know about this part yet, but I like that he's going to try to have a representative cabinet at least gender-wise).
I'd rather not have someone with a history that's anti-GMO, thinks wifi can cause cancer, believes homeopathic medicine should be covered by our public healthcare, a 9/11 truther, and an anti-vaxxer be anywhere near a cabinet position. For the Greens claiming to be pro-environment they sure do have some dumb ideas on science.I don't think she makes it into cabinet, but I could see Trudeau giving her some kind of ceremonial role on the environment. She's a pretty effective parliamentarian, and she's really good at getting attention for someone with such a small platform. Channelling her energies elsewhere would be smart politics in that it would get rid of pointed criticism -- and, not coincidentally, it would also help raise the Green profile, mostly at the expense of the NDP. There'd be a risk of it backfiring if they do something she doesn't like and she has to break from them, but...enh, it feels like a risk worth taking.
AmenIt's the smart, strategically minded people who might surround him that worry me, personally.
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/politics/liberals-map-swift-overhaul-of-anti-terror-law
C-51 getting overhauled ASAP
They're moving even faster than I had hoped
It reads as if they are mostly adding oversight, and clarification on vague terms. They should just get rid of it, but I guess they didn't campaign on that
really? which century was that? certainly not the 18th, 19th, or 20th centuries. doubtful even in the 17th century.Not a separatist, but I imagine they'd argue Canada is the reason Quebec is so poor. It's not like the province was always economic deadweight, you know. Montreal used to be the financial and trade hub of North America before New York overtook it. Quebec used to have strong textile and pharmaceuticals industries, but free trade agreements like NAFTA (and soon, the TPP) paired with a volatile dollar thanks to oil really screwed Quebec manufacturers over.
There's also the possibility that, you know, money isn't the most important thing in life. Crazy, I know.
Yeah, that's not true. Montreal was the hub of trade in New France, but there's no reason why anybody in the British colonies would have been running their trade through there -- indeed, that wasn't logistically possible until the advent of railroads midway through the 19th century, and New York was already the first city of the New World by then.really? which century was that? certainly not the 18th, 19th, or 20th centuries. doubtful even in the 17th century.