kazuyamishima
Member
What you mean to say is, Sony stopped reporting sales numbers this gen on all their big games and we know the reason why.![]()

they report total hardware and games sales, what they don't do is report individual games sales.
What you mean to say is, Sony stopped reporting sales numbers this gen on all their big games and we know the reason why.![]()
He also stated that Mario Wonder wouldn't be able to sell over 20m mark lifetime.Chris seems like a bit of a donkey tbh. His comment about the C team was the most egregious thing and he did damage control saying that was misinterpreted lol.
![]()
Exactly, and we know why they stopped reporting individual games. I'll let you into a secret. It stopped with a certain title called last of us 2. They did the initial announcement and then stopped.![]()
they report total hardware and games sales, what they don't do is report individual games sales.
I was perfectly fine ignoring these threads but I was tagged so I'm just responding. I told this clown to @ me when he could prove me wrong and he @'s me for this nonsense. This is not proof, there are no numbers.Are you okay?
Want to talk?
I am? Nah, making shit up looks like this:
What did Dring actually say?
![]()
Turns out, Ghost of Yotei ranked 12th during its debut, with 4.4% of active PS players that week giving it a go.Ghost of Tsushima also ranked 12th in its launch week back in 2020 with... 4.4% of active PS players engaging.
Exactly. Bragging about sales numbers is huge, positive publicity for your brand. All these companies stopped when their sales started shitting the bed. Ubisoft, for example, didn't switch from sales to players because it was a better metric, they did it to hide sales numbers, and now they're hiding player numbers. If GoY came out and sold 5 million copies in the first week, you can guarantee they'd have announced it. So if other people want to fall for this nonsense, they can have it, but I believe numbers, not fanboys running defense.What you mean to say is, Sony stopped reporting sales numbers this gen on all their big games and we know the reason why.
It's the same reason that MS stopped reporting their sales figures for hardware and software since gamepass launched.
You just have poor reading comprehension. He literally said "in line" which doesn't mean more, it means in line with the installed user base. He is saying the same thing Mat Piscatella said two days ago:
"In line" means about the sales were about the same. It has nothing to do with install base.I was perfectly fine ignoring these threads but I was tagged so I'm just responding. I told this clown to @ me when he could prove me wrong and he @'s me for this nonsense. This is not proof, there are no numbers.
But you are right, until we see numbers there is nothing to talk about so I'll dip out and you guys can pretend that this story means anything in the grand scheme of things.
You just have poor reading comprehension. He literally said "in line" which doesn't mean more, it means in line with the installed user base. He is saying the same thing Mat Piscatella said two days ago:
In case you are bad at math, 4% of 80 million is less than 4% of 120 million, but it's "in line". So, no, not only did it not outsell GoT it literally sold less as a total and is only equal in percentage of total consoles on the market.
Not that it matters, there still isn't a single definitive sales number about GoY from ANYWHERE, we have nothing half truths and bullshit.
Exactly. Bragging about sales numbers is huge, positive publicity for your brand. All these companies stopped when their sales started shitting the bed. Ubisoft, for example, didn't switch from sales to players because it was a better metric, they did it to hide sales numbers, and now they're hiding player numbers. If GoY came out and sold 5 million copies in the first week, you can guarantee they'd have announced it. So if other people want to fall for this nonsense, they can have it, but I believe numbers, not fanboys running defense.
Yep, the shift to aggregate sales numbers is how you hide underperforming games. It's the same as publishers shifting to player numbers instead of sales numbers. We all know Indy flopped and Shadows didn't sell better than Valhalla.Exactly, and we know why they stopped reporting individual games. I'll let you into a secret. It stopped with a certain title called last of us 2. They did the initial announcement and then stopped.
Except Sony reported on several games after TLoU2...Exactly, and we know why they stopped reporting individual games. I'll let you into a secret. It stopped with a certain title called last of us 2. They did the initial announcement and then stopped.
Yup. The latest one was astrobot last year.Except Sony reported on several games after TLoU2...
Spider-Man 2? God of War Ragnarok? Astrobot? The thing is they take longer to reveal PR for those sales.What you mean to say is, Sony stopped reporting sales numbers this gen on all their big games and we know the reason why.
It's the same reason that MS stopped reporting their sales figures for hardware and software since gamepass launched.
Quite frankly you have poor reading comprehension if that is your takeaway, especially if you still believe that after he clarified sales are the same. Not once did he mention the install base or that sales are relative to it.You just have poor reading comprehension. He literally said "in line" which doesn't mean more, it means in line with the installed user base. He is saying the same thing Mat Piscatella said two days ago:
They are also non consistent with reporitng. Gt7 is probably heading towards best selling GT with the amazing legs it has.Spider-Man 2? God of War Ragnarok? Astrobot? The thing is they take longer to reveal PR for those sales.
Exactly. GT7 is probably at 15M at this point, could've had a PR article on those sales and we never got that. The Last Of Us i think surpassed like 30M in sales...and no article.They are also non consistent with reporitng. Gt7 is probably heading towards best selling GT with the amazing legs it has.
Iirc GT sport sold something like 12 million from the Insomniac leak. I don't think we ever had those sales report.
I'm a bit skeptical that its selling on par with Tsushima in Europe while beating the numbers of Helldivers 2. That would mean Tsushima also sold better than Helldivers 2.
Stuck reading fanboy waring when I just want to be a hater.
![]()
Just Europe huh? Seems like a very selective brag. Why not world wide praise ?
How is this a "brag"? And yes, a report on video game sales in Europe last week is only talking about Europe and not worldwide. That shouldn't surprise anyone.Just Europe huh? Seems like a very selective brag. Why not world wide praise ?
Chris Dring covers Europe only.Just Europe huh? Seems like a very selective brag. Why not world wide praise ?
Exactly. GT7 is probably at 15M at this point, could've had a PR article on those sales and we never got that. The Last Of Us i think surpassed like 30M in sales...and no article.
We usually get these numbers buried in some random PS blog article. Sony doesn't really do this anymore.
People are only raising these questions because they're desperate to find any evidence that the game is doing poorly.Exactly. GT7 is probably at 15M at this point, could've had a PR article on those sales and we never got that. The Last Of Us i think surpassed like 30M in sales...and no article.
We usually get these numbers buried in some random PS blog article. Sony doesn't really do this anymore.
Could be in the case if first week sales of Helldivers II were way lower (something around 50% or even less) of week 2 or week 3 sales. Which would mean beating Helldivers first week sales isnt something extraordinary.In its first week it did.
With GoY we have people that are jumping from a "it is not going to do well at all because of my perceived grievance X and Y which is sure to be terrible because of the voice actor's nefarious plot to make the game uber woke" to "please, it cannot be doing well at all, it has to fail, it has to… let me spread as much BS as I can in the hope it sticks and makes for a horrible word of mouth" to "ok, it did not tank at launch like I needed it to, but the battle to kill the game's legs is just starting, must shill harder!"…
People resorted to make BS rumours about the game's ending and going to threads to spoil people with an apparently made up ending just to drum negativity up… sigh.
This is exactly the issue. People are starting with a conclusion and then working backwards to find a agenda, rather than discussing the actual information being shared and it's actual limitations.People are only raising these questions because they're desperate to find any evidence that the game is doing poorly.
There are people in this thread bringing up completely ridiculous points, like:
"Why didn't they reveal the exact sales numbers?" / But that's never been done — only specific markets disclose those numbers.
"Why are they only revealing numbers from Europe?" / Everyone who's been on this forum for a while knows that there are different entities that report sales for each region, and there's always a discrepancy in the timelines for when those reports come out.
As for sales announcements… we'd never even know how many units some games sold if it wasn't for the Insomniac leak.
Could be in the case if first week sales of Helldivers II were way lower (something around 50% or even less) of week 2 or week 3 sales. Which would mean beating Helldivers first week sales isnt something extraordinary.
Exactly, and we know why they stopped reporting individual games. I'll let you into a secret. It stopped with a certain title called last of us 2. They did the initial announcement and then stopped.
In my understanding.Exactly. GT7 is probably at 15M at this point, could've had a PR article on those sales and we never got that. The Last Of Us i think surpassed like 30M in sales...and no article.
We usually get these numbers buried in some random PS blog article. Sony doesn't really do this anymore.
Any news on platform/it's staple games keeps momentum in public and helps with marketing. Details not so important and like 99% of those who'll read news will ignore details (and those who really need details pays for specialized reports of Circana and co that have numbers).Its probably because a sales figure on its own is pretty meaningless without more context.
Gamers once again rewarding mediocrity.
What is it about the game you aren't enjoying?Gamers once again rewarding mediocrity.
What is it about the game you aren't enjoying?![]()
Safe and not taking risks?Another Sony safe bet sequel taking no creative risks, visuals and technical uplift over the previous game is laughable too considering we're in the third wave of PS5 era games.
Most of all I'm pissed about Jin not returning as I was a big fan of his from the first game, and felt his story was worth continuing.
Another Sony safe bet sequel taking no creative risks, visuals and technical uplift over the previous game is laughable too considering we're in the third wave of PS5 era games.
Most of all I'm pissed about Jin not returning as I was a big fan of his from the first game, and felt his story was worth continuing.
Another thing is wanting Jin to return tells me you did not have a good understanding of the GoTs story. Jin's arc was complete. There was nothing else to tell.
Safe and not taking risks?
You mean like establishing one new character in a franchise that everyone liked (Jin) and deciding to go for a completely different main character for the sequel (a woman, which is an even worse risk clearly)?
Sounds like the safe bet would've been continuing the Jin story instead of this new character no?
I also don't know what risks you want this to take. It's already an open world game that's a delight to navigate, graphics are amazing (not only the assets are much better but it's all 60fps unlike the PS4 version) and a clear step up from the prequel.
It's a sequel that grabbed the mechanics of the first game and made them better, while expanding on them. It also created new ones as well.
Isn't that what sequels do? Did you expect a reboot? lol Like going from GOW Ascencion to GOW 2018?
No it wasn't, the developers alluded to the cannon ending in which Jin lets Lord Shimura live, and Shimura warns him that the Jito is sending all his forces after Jin because he is now considered an enemy of the state. This would have made for an interesting story, something akin to a Batman sequel, Jin fighting the Samurai forces as well as the Mongol invaders. It was a cliff hanger ending, and no one at the time even discussed that his arc had been complete.
There's many ways to make creative risks, replacing the main character within another "bad ass female bent on revenge" is hardly one of them, we already got that with AC Shadows this year.
Speak for yourself on the visuals, I struggle to tell the difference between the original and sequel at times and many others have said the same thing, it looks better marginally better, the geometry is still PS4 level. and it's riddled with blurry textures the game is carried mostly by its fantastic art style, heck even the shoddy RTGI implementation wasn't enough to make it seem like a substantial upgrade over its predecessor.