Yea I think I am about to get mobbed in my game. Spies reveal multiple civs coming for me. Trying to make defensive pacts as fast as possible D:
I was trying to get some pacts going as well. Its funny too, one of the other bigger nations on my continent had a pact going with me. After it ended was when the Polish brought their rain on fire on me. Didn't help that rebels had spawned and I was at war with Sweden. I'm 0-2 thus far.
Yep. It might be worth building forts at the borders if you think you might get attacked from that direction.
Building 4 to 5 layers thick of forts is the best. I always find it worth having a spare worker just to do that from the start. Well, not immediately from the start, but as soon as I can get a cheap spare worker.
Dear Firaxis,
The next time you release a Civ product, please don't do it right before a Steam Sale. I feel horrible buying all these games and then just going back and playing Civ.
Sincerely,
Me
P.S. Don't rush Civ VI. BNW will hold me for awhile.
Holy shit the multiplayer is infuriating.
Is there NO way to load a game as private? I set up the game as private initially but every time I load it it reverts as public and a shit load of people join. It's so so so annoying and blows my mind how dumb the devs have to be to make it like tat.
Doesn't work for me.Check private before you load the game. It's always worked for me.
Oh, I have to build the wonders to find out eh.
Is there a way to see the playtime of a game?
Playing as Venice....what an odd civ to play as..........I guess I should be focusing on gold and diplomacy? Is a science victory even possible?
Now...is there anywhere I can buy/get the soundtrack?
Venice actually makes diplomacy harder, cause you're taking away potential votes if you want to expand, and you need to expand to keep up.
Playing as Venice....what an odd civ to play as..........I guess I should be focusing on gold and diplomacy? Is a science victory even possible?
I didn't even know I have this game on my STEAM account. I barely use it and I was going to purchase it couple of days ago and it said I already own it. I must have bought it last year during the summer sales.
Is the single player any good? I don't think I will touch the multiplayer for this, not enough time.
Venice actually makes diplomacy harder, cause you're taking away potential votes if you want to expand, and you need to expand to keep up.
I'd disagree. As Venice it seem puppet ting more than 3 or 4 city states doesn't seem that useful, so you end up with gazillions of cash to spend bribing the others.
Also, I think every time a city state is removed from the game the number of votes required to win via diplomacy also goes down.
Behold! The brave Breakfastonians have expanded into a thriving civilization.
I've mastered the expansion. Can easily win on prince.
That ain't mastered, son.
When does tourism start really kicking in? I got beat to the louvre because I had to take Rome, I have like +30 atm from just Venice. Are there some mad multipliers eventually? Feeling like I'm not doing much and the game could just end with me out of time
For me anyway. I don't have interest in playing against a dumb AI that spams units and has happiness handicap.
Fucking hell I can not stop playing this god damn game.
Right, if you really want to tourism swamp an empire, you should trade with every city they have. It'll provide 25% bonus to tourism vs that city for each trade route iirc. Sure, you lose out on some science, but it's all a matter of tradeoffs.I found out also that you get bonuses based on the deal you have with other civs. Open borders, trade routes and ideologies all affect your influence on them.
Right, if you really want to tourism swamp an empire, you should trade with every city they have. It'll provide 25% bonus to tourism vs that city for each trade route iirc. Sure, you lose out on some science, but it's all a matter of tradeoffs.
It's something I considered but never tried, cause in that game I was desperately trading with other city states to keep their influence up using the Treaty Organization (Freedom 3).
25% for every trade route?!? Hesus.
They do that so they can keep up. My emperor gsme right now is waaaaay more fun thsn the prince one where they lay down and die.
That's what I remember but I didn't pay much attention to the screen when I saw it. It might be less.
Let me check.
No, it's +25% if there's any trade route, and doesn't stack.
+25% Diplomat
+25% OBT
+25% Trade Route
+25% Same Religion
+33% Same Ideology
-33% different ideology
If you're not worried about tourism than I hope you're prepared to follow other civs' ideology. Nothing worse than having rebels spawn in your country because they're tired of freedom and wants some autocracy.
Nah, you don't, museums have two slots and can have theme bonuses
Is it true that if you aren't going for a cultural victory, you might as well simply ignore tourism altogether?
Even if you aren't going for a military or science victory, it is still advantageous to generate military units and science, but tourism doesn't provide any tangible turn-by-turn advantage, which is a bummer.
I only just got to the Renaissance era so hopefully I just haven't arrived to where it comes in handy.
But I thought that the defense against tourism is culture. There is a clear turn-to-turn advantage for generating culture, but as far as I can tell not for tourism. (Again, I'm still early game.)