So yeah, this game is more addicting than ever since BNW came out. The expansion sure did flesh out areas of the game that were lacking. I used to love the first half of the game but the end usually dragged on for me. Now, I honestly not only love the start of every game but I look forward to (and enjoy the hell out of) the end game as well. It's rounded the game out very nicely.
I just played my third game to victory since buying BNW, this time I took the Zulu out with a domination victory as the goal. What I expected to be a fairly straightforward quick game turned out to be a very long 20+ hours of real life time game.
At the start I quickly settled a five city empire and then went full production to build an army capable of clearing off my continent. Montezuma went down first as he settled a city right next to me (and he can be a pain if left alone too long), then Germany went under my heel, and finally Japan lost their empire to me. With my continent cleared I settled a few more cities to claim the land (all in good high production spots), I had puppetted all of the conquered cities except for the capitals. I was already on great terms with all of the city states on my landmass due to me slaughtering barb camps everywhere, so my continent was under control and secured.
Next I teched up for awhile and roamed the seas looking for the rest of the world. During the time I was cleansing my continent of all the infidels, I received notifications that an two unmet civs had lost their capitals in a far away land, so I knew that part of my work had already been done for me. In time I discovered another continent that was much larger then my own. This one had four empires sitting on it: Ghandi of Inida, Indonesia, Brazil, and Rome. I was much larger than India, Indonesia, and Brazil, and I outclassed them good enough, but Rome was another story. Caeser had an empire that was not only larger than mine, had a larger army than mine, but also had a tech advantage, although just barely.
Looking at the domination victory screen I could see that I already possessed four capitals: my own plus the three civs that started with me. Everyone else still had their original capitals, but Rome also owned the capitals of two civs that I had never met and were now gone into history. Two less capitals I would need to take to win, makes my work easier!
The city of Rome was far across the ocean and difficult to get at from my continent, but Indonesia's was just a hop across the water from one of my own coastal cities. So the gameplan I formed was this: I would take the capital of Indonesia first, then using that as a launching point I would march across this continent on a tear taking Delhi from Ghandi and then Brazil's capital after that. It was almost a straight line through the landmass, and Brazil's capital was placed nicely along a medium sized bay, across which just happened to sit Rome itself. I decided I would puppet everything new and only take two other cities along the way that were in my way. I wanted a nice unbroken line of supply. So I ramped up the war machine, ignoring wonders and tourism and culture. I would beeline to military techs whenever possible. I had two science cities back on my continent and one really good gold city, they would stay specialized while everything else churned out units to fuel my path to victory as fast as possible.
It was a good plan.
And it worked pretty much exactly how I envisioned it. Indonesia fell to my coastal assault, the capital put up a good fight but I took it nonetheless and immediately made peace with him, leaving him with only two other small cites. He was no longer a concern. I reinforced the army, and after I positioned it to my liking I declared war on Ghandi taking a city of his in just a few turns that gave me access to Delhi. Delhi took a bit more work than the Indonesia capital did, Ghandi put up a hell of a fight for it. Eventually I took it though, and I ended up annexing Delhi due to just how awesome a city it was (huge food production, lots of wonders, and simply raking in gold). Next I declared war on Brazil and after taking a city of his to get at his capital, I literally steamrolled the Brazilian army in just a matter of a few turns. It was horribly one sided, the capital fell quickly and he gave me another city of his as well in the peace negotiations.
I owned a swath of cities right down the middle of this new continent, and left the empires of Indonesia, Brazil, and India broken. I now set my sights on my final target: the city of Rome, which was just a short hop across a bay from my last conquered city. I made two city states across the bay allies of mine, and using them to harbor my army, I soon waged war on Rome. By this time I had mostly closed the tech gap and our armies were evenly matched. But a good part of his army was up north as he had been picking at Ghandi's leftovers after I crippled him, so I blew through his units down my way, assaulted the capital while dealing with his reinforcements and after a dozen turns or so I finally took Rome in the year 1967!
Only my game didn't end.
I studied the domination victory screen for a bit just to verify that yes every civ had lost it's capital except for me. I'd won domination victories before, was this a bug in the game? I went to Google to see if others had experienced something similar and it was then that I realized the folly of my plan: Brave New World changed the conditions for a domination victory. Now, in order to win you must control all original capitals, even the capitals of civs who were no longer in the game! Somehow, I had missed that change up until right at that moment, lol.
Rome had a huge empire, most of which I had beelined around, and most of which I had not even explored yet. And somewhere in all of that were two more cities that I needed to take.
So the new plan was this: march my armies across the land of Rome and take every city I come across that sounds like it wasn't a Roman city to begin with. I took Thebes, I took Turfan, I took Memphis (which turned out to be one of the capitals I needed), I took city after bloody city in an epic struggle that lasted over 50 years, through many tech changes. Even without the capital of Rome, Caeser was putting up a hell of a fight. He actually had out teched me again and had WWII bombers against my great war bombers, he even started fielding landships. Eventually my relentless onslaught crippled his war machine and I conquered the Roman city of Karakoss, which turned out to the the last capital I was crusading for.
So my domination victory took quite a bit longer than I anticipated. Pretty much played Civ V this entire weekend. And loved every minute of it. Because the entire time I was warmongering against Rome, Brazil was buying off city states and garnering votes for the UN. And India and Indonesia were both scrapping with me along the way, I did my best to simply contain them as my goal was solely on those last two capitals of Rome but they made it more difficult than it had to be.
At this point, after a few games of BNW under my belt, I think I finally like Civ V better than Civ IV. For me it's finally taken over the mantle.
Time to start a new game up, maybe I'll try Poland next....