D
That's a load of crap.
The Attitude Era had plenty of flaws. Random booking, lame tasteless angles, bad wrestling.
Plenty of good but it's no infallible time.
The in-ring wrestling today is vastly superior, with much better athletes. This really isn't up for debate.
This is way too cynical. Cena's over with everyone. 18-49 men want to like the guy, because he works hard and is legitimately good at just about everything that has to do with wrestling, but his character hasn't changed in a decade and he's too constantly and predictably victorious.Cena would be a worse heel than he is a face. Bad is bad, there's nothing you can do about it. He's never going to have a personality that gets him over with anyone except stupid mark kids and superficial, chronically single women.
CM Punk and Bryan are both as charismatic and capable as anyone from any era. The topic is how the company doesn't care. Daniel Bryan's "Yes" chant was just a thing he did on his own, and it's gotten him super, super over, but it's not getting him anywhere without the support of his bosses.I don't get the part timer hate.
The Rocks, Stone Colds, HHHs and such weren't popular just because the WWE made them that way.
The new talent of the post attitude era had years to come up with stars...
Cena was the biggest we got.
If some of the others developed an ounce of charisma the WWE wouldn't be stuck in a position like this.
Though I admit im not a fan of the return of Brock Lesnar or Batista.
I don't get the part timer hate.
The Rocks, Stone Colds, HHHs and such weren't popular just because the WWE made them that way.
The new talent of the post attitude era had years to come up with stars...
Cena was the biggest we got.
If some of the others developed an ounce of charisma the WWE wouldn't be stuck in a position like this.
Though I admit im not a fan of the return of Brock Lesnar or Batista.
The Prototype haha...still remember Cena before he was Cena and his first match against Angle.
I don't get the part timer hate.
The Rocks, Stone Colds, HHHs and such weren't popular just because the WWE made them that way.
The new talent of the post attitude era had years to come up with stars...
Cena was the biggest we got.
If some of the others developed an ounce of charisma the WWE wouldn't be stuck in a position like this.
Though I admit im not a fan of the return of Brock Lesnar or Batista.
Isn't Big E Langston his friend?After being in WWE for like 13 years, Cena STILL has no friends.
That tells you everything you need to know about him.
Thuganomics Cena was brilliant heel back in the day. Too bad he's way too popular among kids to become a heel.It'll probably be the most boring heel turn in the history of heel turns. Pick one:
- Cena goes back to the rap gimmick, except it's no longer funny because he can't rap about Big Show needing a bra in the PG era.
- Cena joins/creates some boring-ass dominance group and goes from being a boring generic face wrestler to a boring generic heel wrestler, insert feud with some face where him and goons repeatedly and predictably jump the face, etc.
- Cena goes with the "I'm not getting what I deserve out of this company" angle and jumps a bunch of title picture wrestlers by himself backstage.
Basically, it's not going to be anything remotely creative, and smarks will be wondering why they wanted Cena to turn heel in the first place.
Isn't Big E Langston his friend?
Thuganomics Cena was brilliant heel back in the day. Too bad he's way too popular among kids to become a heel.
Big E. and Roman Reigns work out at his gym. I feel like Seth Rollins does as well.
He actually wasn't brilliant at all. His entire shtick was making jerk off and gay jokes. All of his raps. All of them.
Thats what actually made him a perfect heel and it was good. Fact that his raps were terrible and everyone hated the whole thug wannabe white man.He actually wasn't brilliant at all. His entire shtick was making jerk off and gay jokes. All of his raps. All of them.
and theI figured out how to fix WWE
bring back Val Venis
That's a load of crap.
The Attitude Era had plenty of flaws. Random booking, lame tasteless angles, bad wrestling.
Plenty of good but it's no infallible time.
The in-ring wrestling today is vastly superior, with much better athletes. This really isn't up for debate.
No JR or punk, so the chances of Austin ever wrestling again are even smaller, right?
Part timers coming back for the fans isn't bad but when they come back at the expense of developing the new talents it's just stupidly short term thinking. There's a huge amount of talent in the WWE and if they could actually book their talent effectively they'd be set.
I don't have problem with Lesnar because he's enjoyable to watch and he's never in the way. Batista's just a mediocre wrestler who's getting a mega push at the expense of people who're actually talented and have worked hard for a push.
and theHO TRAIN!!!
Into the trash it goes.Morley supports cannabis legalization in the United States. He is involved in the Tea Party Movement, and supported Ron Paul in the 2012 presidential election
I gotta disagree with the in ring wrestling being better. It is so corographed it's not even funny these days. It's like some of the wrestlers don't even try and is a finisher spot fest. The in ring action today couldn't be more predictable not to mention watered down moves as in no pile drivers and tombstones. Matches were much better in the 90s.
I don't get the part timer hate.
The Rocks, Stone Colds, HHHs and such weren't popular just because the WWE made them that way.
The new talent of the post attitude era had years to come up with stars...
Cena was the biggest we got.
If some of the others developed an ounce of charisma the WWE wouldn't be stuck in a position like this.
Though I admit im not a fan of the return of Brock Lesnar or Batista.
I gotta disagree with the in ring wrestling being better. It is so corographed it's not even funny these days. It's like some of the wrestlers don't even try and is a finisher spot fest. The in ring action today couldn't be more predictable not to mention watered down moves as in no pile drivers and tombstones. Matches were much better in the 90s.
They're like that if you only watch RAW TV matches. Matches were better in the 90s if you watched AJPW and NJPW, maybe.
But the average quality of wrestling in WWE has probably never been higher. All over the place in WWE, you regularly find good matches, up and down the card. In NXT, on Main Event, even on Smackdown, and the 3 hour RAWs have given us a ton of really good matches, especially with the Shield or Daniel Bryan. Major PPV matches also tend to be good at a minimum, or possibly great.
Down on NXT, they have a seriously impressive roster of indie talent that's growing more and more, and those just starting to wrestle have the best training possible, so the future is bright in terms of in-ring wrestling.
Agreed. I think where the Attitude Era really is best above all other era's is they build up multiple main event level stars as opposed to only having one or two real main eventers. You had Rock, Stone Cold, Taker, Mankind, Triple H and a whole load more that could main event PPV's and draw crowds.
That's a load of crap.
The Attitude Era had plenty of flaws. Random booking, lame tasteless angles, bad wrestling.
Plenty of good but it's no infallible time.
The in-ring wrestling today is vastly superior, with much better athletes. This really isn't up for debate.
This is basically a Russo pros and cons list.
It shouldn't be that hard to just...not have Cena having matches every week. He can still be on the shows every week to build up to PPV matches and do promos, but there is zero reason at all to have him wrestling on Raw every week. So overexposed. Raw has 3 hours to work with and there are plenty of guys who haven't even been on TV in months (Ryder, JTG, Yoshi, Camacho, Hunico before returning as Sin Cara, Christian despite being healthy, Curt Hawkins, PTP, 3MB haven't been on Raw for a while, Otunga hasn't been on TV since around WM I think, Justin Gabriel hasn't been on Raw in a long time). You have 3 hours to fill with a lot of talent that doesn't get used instead of over exposing all your top guys every week. Makes no sense to me. The best part of 3 hour Nitros was all the random dudes that wouldn't have been on otherwise, not an extra hour of stale main event guys.
Part timers coming back for the fans isn't bad but when they come back at the expense of developing the new talents it's just stupidly short term thinking. There's a huge amount of talent in the WWE and if they could actually book their talent effectively they'd be set.
I don't have problem with Lesnar because he's enjoyable to watch and he's never in the way. Batista's just a mediocre wrestler who's getting a mega push at the expense of people who're actually talented and have worked hard for a push.
And guess who booked in WWE in the Attitude Era til 1999?
Not sure if posted yet, but here's Stone Cold on the Arsenio Hall Show on Punk quitting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EugGeZK-ofI
Exactly. It's amazing how the last 10 or so years have made me miss him to the point where I'd hail him as a saviour if he came back.
Go watch any of his TNA to disabuse yourself of this notion. Anybody who wants Vince Russo in any position of power isn't an actual wrestling fan.
Isn't Big E Langston his friend?
Stone Cold raised some good points there.
Not sure if posted yet, but here's Stone Cold on the Arsenio Hall Show on Punk quitting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EugGeZK-ofI
at work, what is the summary of what Austin said about punk?
the thing with CM Punk though is he doesn't seem like a burnout. I think he saved a good deal of money, or at least he won't be hurting for WWE payday. i dunno.
the thing with CM Punk though is he doesn't seem like a burnout. I think he saved a good deal of money, or at least he won't be hurting for WWE payday. i dunno.