The Artisan
Member
yeah. things like this you can't be thinking aloudNo, but it wasn't professional.
yeah. things like this you can't be thinking aloudNo, but it wasn't professional.
yeah I heard about this..Didn't he eat a piece of a human brain? Not sure cannibals have much honor.
I agree. He does present a whitewashed version of Islam, and this is coming from someone who took a course of his.
not a great standard set my friendUnprofessionalism makes you leader of the free world so
He generally presents the good, and conceals the bad. A scholar shouldn't just present their personal view, they should present an objective viewpoint supported by reliable sources.I don't think he present a whitewashed version of Islam at all, he present Islam as he understand it. I read some part of his book about Islam, and i don't agree with everything, but i don't believe he is manipulating anything. He just give his personals views and he certainly is knowledgeable.
But what scholar dosen't ? He accept Islam as existing by itself, independent of what men do with it. For others academics, Islam is ISIS and the Muslim Golden Age alike. I don't believe that one approach is necessarily better than the other, it's just different.
He generally presents the good, and conceals the bad. A scholar shouldn't just present their personal view, they should present an objective viewpoint supported by reliable sources.
Having said that, I am not discounting his works or claiming he has malicious intent, I am simply stating that they are more aimed at providing an optimistic and liberal perspective of Islam.
I keep saying the freedom of speech is dying, some call it melodrama. I call it facts.
Freedom of speech was never about letting people say anything without any consequences.
I actually agree that commentators shouldn't express themselves like this. I think professional people should conduct themselves respectfully and with dignity in public.
But it seems totally untenable to simultaneously argue that the way Trump speaks about others is acceptable and that the way others speak about Trump is unacceptable.
And enforcing it against a guy who gets paid to talk on CNN and not against a guy who gets paid to use the nuclear codes seems arbitrary and capricious.
You know where else Reza Aslan is hated? On racists, Islamophobes and nazis' websites. Great company you got.
"Believer" was such a low-quality, schlocky display of pandering anyway.
"You can't disagree with someone if unrelated groups of people also disagree."Man, I love this logic.
He generally presents the good, and conceals the bad. A scholar shouldn't just present their personal view, they should present an objective viewpoint supported by reliable sources.
Having said that, I am not discounting his works or claiming he has malicious intent, I am simply stating that they are more aimed at providing an optimistic and liberal perspective of Islam.
Should have been fired for his obfuscation about female genital mutilation, suggesting it was merely an "African problem."
You know where else Reza Aslan is hated? On racists, Islamophobes and nazis' websites. Great company you got.
Should have been fired for his obfuscation about female genital mutilation, suggesting it was merely an "African problem."
Alt headline: CNN fires reporter for speaking the truth.
Heh hehAnd yet Corey Lewandowski was hired as a political commentator shortly after the physical assault incident.
Pretty much what happened here.When keeping it real goes wrong
The problem is that he implied Trump is not a complete shit, only a piece of it. He's minimizing Trump's shittiness.
I grew up gay in a Christian household, so I have very, very little patience for people who try to damage control for dangerous religious ideologies under the guise of love and tolerance. Good riddance.
I actually agree that commentators shouldn't express themselves like this. I think professional people should conduct themselves respectfully and with dignity in public.
But it seems totally untenable to simultaneously argue that the way Trump speaks about others is acceptable and that the way others speak about Trump is unacceptable.
And enforcing it against a guy who gets paid to talk on CNN and not against a guy who gets paid to use the nuclear codes seems arbitrary and capricious.
Man, I love this logic.
I don't see the issue here. Dude can hold whatever opinion he wants, just don't spew stuff like that in public. It's incredibly unprofessional and I wouldn't want someone saying that stuff to represent my brand. It's an open and shut thing.
The apology is nice, but I think the damage was done.
it wasn't really an apology it just looks like he wanted to leave cnn on good terms, like he didn't say anything that would imply ill will towards them.I dont think he apologized, which makes me like Reza even more. Fuck Trump, and honestly fuck CNN for their double standards.
it wasn't really an apology it just looks like he wanted to leave cnn on good terms, like he didn't say anything that would imply ill will towards them.
indeed. but this and the cannibal thing aren't adding positives to his image.Yeah hes just being professional now. If he left saying FUCK CNN that would make it much harder for him to land his next gig. No one wants to hire a guy who shits on their previous boss.
Should have been fired for his obfuscation about female genital mutilation, suggesting it was merely an "African problem."
Alt headline: CNN fires reporter for speaking the truth.
Sounds like he got fired for telling the truth
Its not like he wasn't telling the truth, which is what any good journalist should do...
Firing someone from a news organization for telling the truth.
What a world we live in.