excelsiorlef
Member
To be fair, it's not a big stretch to believe Clinton is behind this.
?
This is all a Jill Stein scam.
Fucking typical though everything someone else does is HRC's fault.
To be fair, it's not a big stretch to believe Clinton is behind this.
You do know that Jill and Hillary are two different people, right?
Jill Stein has no credibility to lose by requesting a recount and she has zero chance of winning the election with a recount. But if Hillary wins the recount maybe Jill Stein gets a sweet spot on Hillary's cabinet... And Hillary doesn't look like a fool if the recount comes up empty.
It's pretty much win-win for all parties involved.
I'd say at the worst it's 50/50 Hillary is pulling the strings.
Why do people keep saying this? What a nonsensical thing to say. We know it doesn't because of the EC but it's stop a fact that more Americans wanted Hillary.Which means absolutely nothing.
Man, if only someone could leak her emails saying she's behind this. As well as the DNC.I'm going to throw my hat into the conspiracy theory ring: Hillary is most definitely behind this.
They're getting in on it because the recounts are happening and will affect her campaign either way. What is wrong with you?Clinton's team is getting in on the recounts. It also says something about Hillary's supporters who didn't let it go, and are therefore, according to her words, a threat to our democracy.
Clinton's team is getting in on the recounts. It also says something about Hillary's supporters who didn't let it go, and are therefore, according to her words, a threat to our democracy.
A. Clinton's team is not Clinton.Clinton's team is getting in on the recounts. It also says something about Hillary's supporters who didn't let it go, and are therefore, according to her words, a threat to our democracy.
So is Trump's team. It means nothing.
I'm going to throw my hat into the conspiracy theory ring: Hillary is most definitely behind this.
Clinton's team is getting in on the recounts. It also says something about Hillary's supporters who didn't let it go, and are therefore, according to her words, a threat to our democracy.
If we are going to conspiracy town, I'd say it's the Russians. What better way to destabilize a country than to rig an election for one puppet to win, then have your other puppet provide evidence that the election was rigged. It would be total chaos, the Trump supporters would never accept the presidency being taken from him now.
Clinton's team is getting in on the recounts. It also says something about Hillary's supporters who didn't let it go, and are therefore, according to her words, a threat to our democracy.
If we are going to conspiracy town, I'd say it's the Russians. What better way to destabilize a country than to rig an election for one puppet to win, then have your other puppet provide evidence that the election was rigged. It would be total chaos, the Trump supporters would never accept the presidency being taken from him now.
Man, if only someone could leak her emails saying she's behind this. As well as the DNC.
Clinton's team is getting in on the recounts. It also says something about Hillary's supporters who didn't let it go, and are therefore, according to her words, a threat to our democracy.
in an observational role, as they did for the original election, along with trump's campaign, and any international observers
Why do people keep saying this? What a nonsensical thing to say. We know it doesn't because of the EC but it's stop a fact that more Americans wanted Hillary.
Man, what an absolutely massive waste of so many people's time and money.
ClockedT tbh.Man, listen, your political posts are almost as shitty as your Street Fighter posts. Almost.
Are you trolling?HillGAF would dismiss it it, like always.
But this nonsense about the Russians hacking a bunch of states, giving Trump 100K+ votes? Absolutely believable.
With that logic more Americans voted against than for any candidate... What are you even saying? More Americans voted for her than they did the other candidates individually. If you want to reach and add Trump, Jill, and Gary's together sure but that isn't how an election would work on any reality.Actually more Americans voted against her than those that voted for her. She was a plurality winner, not a majority winner.
A recount =/= not conceding
This is basically the electoral equivalent of instant replay.
As they should.
Lol at Conway trying to attach Clinton to this.
This is why the aduit is important, even if it doesn't change one of the results. From one of the cybersecurity experts
https://medium.com/@jhalderm/want-t...d-look-at-the-ballots-c61a6113b0ba#.pv5qngde4
It is very unlikely to change anything but fragile trump supporters are crying that someone dares question the legitimacy of the election (something that Donald himself did on many occasions) and are trying to blame Hillary for it as usual.I can't understand from your guys' responses: is this legitimate or is something else going on?
Of course it = not conceding, it's impossible to concede + demand a recount, because demanding a recount is not something that somebody who presently accepts the results would do.
Hillary conceded and didn't demand a recount. These evident facts invalidate the rest of your post.
With that logic more Americans voted against than for any candidate... What are you even saying? More Americans voted for her than they did the other candidates individually. If you want to reach and add Trump, Jill, and Gary's together sure but that isn't how an election would work on any reality.
To be honest, the money the president gets is pittance and anyone going for office would be paid at least 3x more in private jobs in the same level. Running for office is a public service and the kind of person who is running for it should have the desire to push policy, where this exchange doesn't apply. (you are not running for the money so you can't be bought to take the fall)salary as president for four years of excruciating 24/7 work = $400K*4=$1.6M
half of the recount 'lawyer fees' & 'election integrity efforts' for a few days' of gofundme donations = $3M
not even including the income from a few months of campaigning.
i know which I would pick.
So is Trump's team. Everyone with a stake in the election gets involved to ensure no shenanigans happen. Also Trump's campaign is looking to do recounts in NV and AZ as a response.Clinton's team is getting in on the recounts. It also says something about Hillary's supporters who didn't let it go, and are therefore, according to her words, a threat to our democracy.
Well... People really need to understand the risks of electronic voting though, state espionage is no small thing.If the Russians have that much undetectable control over our system, then we might as well just surrender now.
HillGAF would dismiss it it, like always.
But this nonsense about the Russians hacking a bunch of states, giving Trump 100K+ votes? Absolutely believable.
Wisconsins margin was pretty small, I don't think it it's that big of a deal. Recounts almost always change numbers, which in itself seems odd to me.
Saying that she didn't receive the majority of the vote by combining votes for all other candidates is delusional at best.Is it not a fact that she was a plurality winner? It's obvious that applies to everyone but to say that she should be the President because more Americans voted for her is disingenuous at Best when we all know/knew the EC rules.
...would be used to train Green Party candidates for local office.
Hillary didn't file this recount and idk which GAF you're seeing because most of it is people saying that nothing will change.I dunno... Didn't Trump simply say back then that if the results seemed odd to him, he'd have to see if he'd dispute it? And he got tore up by the press and Democrats for saying that. "A threat to our democracy!" said Hillary. At least he was honest about it.
Hillary conceded, and now this is happening and GAF is happy about it?
*looks at Stein's twitter account*
She's crazy, right.
I dunno... Didn't Trump simply say back then that if the results seemed odd to him, he'd have to see if he'd dispute it? And he got tore up by the press and Democrats for saying that. "A threat to our democracy!" said Hillary. At least he was honest about it.
Hillary conceded, and now this is happening and GAF is happy about it?
*looks at Stein's twitter account*
She's crazy, right.
Clinton was honest as well...not sure what you are saying here.
As involved as Trump's team is.Yeah I'm reading some conflicting info here and in articles. I'm not sure how involved Hillary & her team is with this.
*looks at Stein's twitter account*
She's crazy, right.