I'm hearing that TCU has now lost LB Joel Hasley, who started in 10 games last season, because he wanted to "retire from football." They've been taking some pretty solid hits to the depth chart recently between this guy, the starting left tackle who quit last week, and the DB who was kicked off the team a month or two back.
Practically no position/player is going to be NFL ready out of high school and college ball gives them an avenue to get players the experience and training they need to be NFL ready. Select positions would be able to transition earlier to the NFL because they're more straightforward but doing away with the age restriction wouldn't do anything other than force the NFL to create a minor league system or find some other way to force players into the college system. The NFL has no interest in a minor league because of the resources it would require.
That's partly why I put "problem" in quotation marks. I agree with your post, they would have to have a minor league/developmental league which would not only allow 18 year olds but possibly also have an age cap on it and I would imagine there's no interest in it.
Another option would be for a different organization to open up a league for players of that age, but accounting for the unlikeliness of that is reflected in my original post by the fact that I said the players don't "realistically" have that option; again, I don't know what the restrictions in the CFL are, but even if we were to assume that the CFL or UFL (if that even exists) or whatever allowed 18 year olds they'd still be reducing their chances of making the NFL versus just going to college.
It's a bit of a mess that I don't think we'll find a good option for for quite a while, if ever.
Not related. Probably better articles out there but that was the first result. They're friends and went to highschool together. He dropped out of college to be JFF's manager. To talk to JFF you have to go through him, he coordinates his bodyguards for their appearances, negotiates the payment for JFF's appearances, whether he wants only brown M&M's, etc.
I knew they weren't actually related, but if they "closed the loophole" by only putting in regulations against family members and not unrelated individuals then I would say that seems incredibly shortsighted to me. I guess I just assumed that when they closed the loophole they didn't limit it to just family members. If they did, I wonder if this guy would technically fall under some kind of agent rule?