She doesn't do that when she goes on her rants. Mostly talking about queer books getting cancelled which I took as a hint.
She does subtweet too tho
She doesn't do that when she goes on her rants. Mostly talking about queer books getting cancelled which I took as a hint.
I want an X book with the Stepfords, Goldballs, Hijack, Triage, Tempus, and Benjamin Deeds lead by Emma Frost.The New Bendis Five would be literally perfect as Exiles, since they've been exiled by editorial.
"Fixing the future" is never not going to be a go-to plot in a universe full of potential shit futures. AoU made it interesting by making it so time travel into the past ACTUALLY alters things.Cable creative team announced. James Robinson and Carlos Pacheco. Plot is Cable trying to fix time(can he go and kill the O5?) which is like the 5th time this "mission" has happened since AoU it feels like.
It makes sense given the current state of his powers.Yeah he did. Rulk 2 sounds like a last minute change. But at least now it makes sense he has a mustache. Rulk 2 already the superior Rulk
Sunspot for Citizen V is a cool choice, I'm interested in seeing how that pans out
How was that book, by the way? Seemed like a dope concept.James Robinson on Cable is a goddamn kiss of death. This book is as dead as All-New Invaders.
Seems applicable to superhero books in generalIf you're not gonna be into a contemplation of Batman as a character while also getting a dope jail fight, I don't know what you're into Batman comics for, imo..
COMICS! |OT| January 2017 Your opinion's fine unless it's not mineMessi and I have just come now up with the title for the January OT
COMICS! January 2017 Bad Opinions: The Thread
I would describe it more as a sci-fi thrillerAmazing. Shade is my favorite "cape comic" right now, if you can even call it that. I'm pulling all four books and I think they're all spectacular.
Superheroes/supervillains. Shade doesn't really have that.Define cape comic
They're all set in the DCU. Mother Panic is definitely a cape comic. The line is a bit blurrier with the other three but Cave Carson can't stop name dropping Superman
Old Man LoganWhat are the best solo (non-group/team) books currently going at Marvel?
You know, I'm almost at Inferno and I admit I'd be pretty curious to see how Marvel Studios would handle adapting the X-Men into kid-friendly movies. I don't really care for worrying about how they'd integrate them, they can just pull an X-Men: Evolution (which I'm also currently watching) and have them hiding out for decades (even with Iron Man creeping on teenage kids like Peter Parker).
But man, essentially every single major X-Men story is absolutely not kid friendly at all lol. The Dark Phoenix Saga would be incomplete without planetary genocide, DOFP has genocide, the Brood Saga has the Broode, the Mutant Massacre has uh, a massacre, Fall of the Mutants is probably too out there for MCU adaptation, and Inferno about a bunch of demons escaping what is essentially hell. Crazy amounts of death in all of them. I'm probably forgetting a few of the big ones. It's definitely apparent Fox is okay with heavy violence and darker themes, so I'll give them that.
Meanwhile the MCU tells us that like 20 people died in both Avengers movies combined or whatever lol
What are the best solo (non-group/team) books currently going at Marvel?
What are the best solo (non-group/team) books currently going at Marvel?
Superheroes/supervillains. Shade doesn't really have that.
That was a trailer thing. The numbers were altered in the actual movie if I recall. Besides, you bring that up, yet *X-Men Apocalypse SPOILERS*Magneto gets magically handwaved for murdering continents. I'd rather have collateral that the heroes were forced to take responsibility for, regardless of how minor, than a villain who murders whole cities and then at the end goes, "Well I fixed your house, so I'll be on my way. Cheerio." Like, come on.
And besides, you say they'd be too violent, but: First Avenger was still a war movie, and Civil War several instances of death and violenceIt's not graphic, but it doesn't mean it wasn't dark. Granted I know it's not as dark as some would like, but relative to a lot of brighter superhero films it certainly is. They could show those storylines, but they just wouldn't go AS hardcore. That's about it.like Tony's parents crashing and then getting CHOKED THE FUCK OUT AS WE WATCHED. Or multiple instances of gatherings of people getting bombed.
Guardians also showed a planet exploding while tons of people on said planet ran away. Like, we saw them incinerate. You act like having people getting killed in the background or in a massive explosion hasn't happened in the MCU movies.
Black Widow
Captain America Sam Wilson
Daredevil
Dr. Strange
Unbelievable Gwenpool
Mighty Thor
Moon Knight
Spider-Man
Unbeatable Squirrel Girl
Just started but looking pretty great:
Foolkiller
Infamous Iron DOOM
Invincible Iron Man
Jessica Jones
Unworthy Thor (mini)
All of Marvel's best stuff right now are solo books and the best of the best are Black Widow, Gwenpool and Moon Knight
Edit: if you're looking for more traditional books, though, you want Mighty Thor, Sam Wilson and the Iron Man books. Those other three I listed are not conventional super hero books
I would say if the protagonist(s) of the book is(are) an actual superhero/supervillain in a traditional sense (hence the "cape" part), and regularly does superhero things i.e. saving people/the world/the universe as we know it to be, then it's a cape book. I'm talking costume, persona, codename, all that jazz. Gotham Central is a cop book taking place in a superhero setting, but not necessarily a superhero book.Is Seven to Eternity a cape book then? Or Birthright?
I dunno I think it is hard to pin down a definition for a cape book. There are cape books with no powers or alter egos and non-cape books with both of those things, even costumes. It's further complicated by the fact that "cape book" doesn't really describe a book's contents at all...like Black Widow and Detective Comics are both cape books but they could hardly be more different
Edit: what about Gotham Central? Is that a cape book? They're just cops. Sometimes they do cop stuff, sometimes they fight super villains (though, usually with an approach more suitable to cops than, say, Batman).
Rhino on the cover of Amazing Spider-Man as a THREAT.Man, James Harren Cover for an upcoming Clone Conspiracy issue, amazing:
Love this guy.
Don't read Spider-man/haven't read CC, butBen Reilly haha. Reilly made up a lot of my spiderman reading as a kid, the bleach blonde daily grind era. Kind of an epic moment for him to be back. I wonder if he will outlast this event. Surely Spider-Carnage is not far behind.
They are dark and messed up, but I think you're overestimating how much actually needs to be shown to get the points across and match tone. They aren't going to show demons eating people in the streets, but having demons running around and people screaming gets the point across well enough on its own.Yeah, I'm sure as hell not defending Apocalypse lol. I was entertained, but Fox would be in a much better position with their X-Men movies had that never existed, both financially and in terms of creating sequels that make sense within the timeline.
I was just reading some UXM and was realizing how fucked up X-Men stories really are. Far darker than anything in the MCU at least. "Killing mutants because they're mutants" is like a core X-Men story/theme (at least when written well, lol modern Marvel) and it's still deeply disturbing. It's like the least kid-friendly of all of Marvel's major franchises/series.
edit: unrelated but that Spider-Man trailer announcement thread went exactly how I thought it would. trailer thread(s) and the OT are going to be shitshows.
I cosign this entire list, though you need to add Steve Rogers Cap, because it and Sam are two halves of the same story. And add Ms. Marvel.
Man how I could I forget Mighty Thor when recommending Marvel solo books? I'm really missing the ball here. Infamous Iron man has been pretty cool, though it has only been two issues.
I would say if the protagonist(s) of the book is(are) an actual superhero/supervillain in a traditional sense (hence the "cape" part), and regularly does superhero things i.e. saving people/the world/the universe as we know it to be, then it's a cape book. I'm talking costume, persona, codename, all that jazz. Gotham Central is a cop book taking place in a superhero setting, but not necessarily a superhero book.
I wouldn't pin it down to just "superheroes" either, because some superheroes don't do that kind of thing. Buffy the Vampire Slayer, for instance, is most definitely a superhero book, but not a cape book. Same with Angel, Hellboy, Death Vigil, so on and so forth.
It's effectively a subgenre. So while Shade does take place in a superhero world, and she does have powers, I wouldn't call it a cape book. In fact, I wouldn't put it in a superhero genre at all.
Is Tom King's Vision a cape book, though, is the real question.
Rhino on the cover of Amazing Spider-Man as a THREAT.
What year is it?
I really have no excuse for not including them beyond feeling my list was too long. Lots of great solo titles at Marvel right now.
Steve cap is fantastic
But when was he last on the cover like that? That cover invokes an old-school feel to me.Rhino has been a threat since The Gauntlet tbqh.
He's Hydra, yet he's still 100% Steve. It's amazing.Hydra Cap is the best the character has been in years. That guy is a tactician and planner.
Hydra Cap is the best the character has been in years. That guy is a tactician and planner.
Aaaaah that feeling when you just got done reading some damn good X-Men comics
I read the first volume of Guardians of the Galaxy by Abnett and Lanning.
Oh I get it.
The Guardians don't all talk like they are the same people. Rocket is much much better. Gamora too.
I bought the Bendis omni today also :/
I read the first volume of Guardians of the Galaxy by Abnett and Lanning.
Oh I get it.
The Guardians don't all talk like they are the same people. Rocket is much much better. Gamora too.
I bought the Bendis omni today also :/
huh... I didn't see this post.
Glad you like it though.
And I'm glad you're seeing where we're coming from now.
Hah, I know everyone loves it, but reading through the Annihilation saga a number of years ago, back when I purchased the OHCs, I always thought it was fine, but not very much more than that, very meat and potatoes style writing, not much flair to it or anything. Much better than what could be offered, for sure, but not exceptional either? Just my opinion of course. Do you guys love it purely because it does the characters justice oppose to utter shit, or do you think it would stand up even if Marvel put out consistent quality cosmic stuff? (loaded question, I know). Not sure if I got onto conquest, was that a big jump up?
Not sure if you're just referring to the events only or DnA's GotG specifically.
Fantastic finale for Agents of SHIELD
That's some of it.
Also, I wouldn't like it as much if cosmic marvel was usually great
Conquest has started off well, I've just finished reading the Quasar tie in
Neither, I'm asking about all of that era of cosmic marvel, I don't think I've read the GOTG run. I've read everything that kicked off and was included in the initial *annihilation* wave, looks like GOTG kicked off out of conquest? There's a reading order graphic I'm referring too that bands all of the cosmic books into categories, Annihilation, conquest, WoK etc
Youre working your way through conquest right now? I'll keep an eye on your feedback then as you go man. I'm just interested if I can take Annihilation as a fair indicator of the rest.
Yeah, I've got that, war of kings etc
excited to read through them
What are the best solo (non-group/team) books currently going at Marvel?
Awesome! Don't get me wrong, I'm not Trash talking them, as mentioned, it could be much worse. I just personally never followed up after the Annihilation era books and everyone seems well read on these so was interested if it out better as it went and so on.
I might be out with the next issue of Champions. I liked it initially but it's been really preachy with the social justice issues lately. To the point where I'm cringing from this dialogue.
Drop it and pick up that new X-Men book with him in it before dropping that one like 3 issues in most likely.I thought the prologue of Annihilation:Conquest legit felt like the start of a sequel movie. Where you're catching up with the characters, and then shit gets real.
Same here, it's losing me.
But also, Cyclops. So I'm torn.
That Han Solo mini was fucking spectacular. Just finished it.
Wow.
Hah, I know everyone loves it, but reading through the Annihilation saga a number of years ago, back when I purchased the OHCs, I always thought it was fine, but not very much more than that, very meat and potatoes style writing, not much flair to it or anything. Much better than what could be offered, for sure, but not exceptional either? Just my opinion of course. Do you guys love it purely because it does the characters justice oppose to utter shit, or do you think it would stand up even if Marvel put out consistent quality cosmic stuff? (loaded question, I know). Not sure if I got onto conquest, was that a big jump up?
Same here, it's losing me.
But also, Cyclops. So I'm torn.
That Han Solo mini was fucking spectacular. Just finished it.
Wow.
Edit: Next Marvel event already revealed by Amazon. Captain Hydra focus. https://www.amazon.com/Captain-America-Steve-Rogers-Vol/dp/130290616X/ref=sr_1_11?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1481215638&sr=1-11 https://www.amazon.com/Captain-America-Sam-Wilson-Vol/dp/1302906143/ref=sr_1_50?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1481215703&sr=1-50&refinements=p_27%3ADaniel+Acuna
So that's two events already for 2017 from Marvel.
I don't remember the other one even getting announced