Does Scarlet Witch 2016 improve? Because I just finished Issue 2 and this is the most boring thing I've read in years.
save the money and just read vision instead.
Does Scarlet Witch 2016 improve? Because I just finished Issue 2 and this is the most boring thing I've read in years.
Ok, I need to know: what is all the hype around Raina Telgemeier's book? Is a whole generation of kids really into her book? I keep seeing it in every top 10 list.
save the money and just read vision instead.
Already read it. I'm caught up on every other Marvel comic, this was the last one on my list.
Some of those numbers are very interesting. Especially the relaunched titles that did not surpass the second issue of their last volume, like Ultimates. And the books that did not benefit at all from CWII tie-ins and arguably suffered...this part we've known about for awhile but it's really something to see all the data together like this.
That's a huge shift in the way people buy Marvel comics. It was once commonly accepted that, for the big 2, a) events sell (obviously still true) b) event tie-ins can give books a boost and c) #1s sell. The latter two points seem to be changing dramatically. While some books with CWII tie-ins did get a boost, others continued on a normal downward trend or even took a hit and most ended up right where they started or lower by the time the tie-in wrapped. A shiny #1 did not help some books at all, like wow at that Ultimates relaunch.
I think Xavier is right in that their scorched earth tactics are largely to blame, especially all the damn events right on top of each other. But I do wonder if staying loyal to one family of titles so you can always pick up all of the tie-ins for the events is still a thing that people do. That was common practice in the '90s...so if that's true Marvel should be freaking out right now
Kinda blows mind that Marvel is letting OML die despite it being one of the most stable solo titles in their entire line. Maybe Lemire doesn't want to do it anymore...if that's the case you find someone else to fucking do it. That's how it's always been done and I don't get why they've stopped doing it. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't but you gotta give it a shot at least.
On the more ordinary side of things, there are the always frustrating cases of fresh ideas and characters doing poorly, and the legit depressing spread between, say, Sam and Steve, like even with that huge blowup over the first issue of Steve Rogers that book is doing much better than Sam Wilson which is easily the better Cap book. But there are a few bright spots here and there, I'm pleased with how Moon Knight is doing DoX doing well despite being agonizingly terrible gives me hope they won't keep Scott and Emma off the board for very long
In general though it's obvious Marvel has lost a lot of trust and is leaning on talent readers don't actually care about that much, like Waid and, sorry to say, Ewing.
I hate to say it, a lot of good things have happened under his watch, but it might be time for Alonso to go. It might be time for new leadership.
easily? woah now. and this is coming from a huge fan of the book.
but yea, we knew the marvel relaunch wasn't as successful as Marvel thought it would be but it is quite interesting to see actual numbers and drops offs.
Steve Rogers is a fascinating character study but almost nothing has happened in seven issues. Plotting, plotting, more plotting. I'm enjoying it but I don't think it's anywhere near as good as Sam Wilson which is grappling with current events and societal issues on the regular and has a more forward-moving plot.
Even if they are roughly the same, which is an opinion I respect and understand, the difference in sales numbers is still sad to see.
Anybody who wants suggestions for the sale:
BOOM!
Weavers
Translucid
Burning Fields
Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers
Power Rangers: Pink
Image
Death Vigil
Secret Identities
Cry Havoc
Rat Queens (Upchurch and Seijic runs and and the Braga one-shot)
Starlight
Huck
Glitterbomb
Nothing else comes to mind for things that should be gotten. Not off the top of my head.
Does Scarlet Witch 2016 improve? Because I just finished Issue 2 and this is the most boring thing I've read in years.
Flow looks at sales.
DR STRANGE SORCERERS SUPREME
10/16 Dr Strange Sorcerers Supreme #1 - 149,710
11/16 Dr Strange Sorcerers Supreme #2 - 29,349 (-80.4%)
Sorcerers supreme had it coming. I was excited for this book but ended up dropping it after reading #2.
OCCUPY AVENGERS
11/16 Occupy Avengers - 38,400
not too surprising. the issue was solid, but nobody wants to read about a guy who killed Bruce Banner. still picking up #2
10/16 Champions #1 - 334,937 [+6,772]
11/16 Champions #2 - 49,733 (-85.2%)
damn at those champions numbers.
biggest surprise: Death of X selling well for all 4 issues. people been craving for Cyclops and Emma.
I can't in good conscience recommend any of those Image titles. So I'll say Manifest Destiny, Birthright, and Rumble.
You shitting on Death Vigil? I will stab you
Now you know why marvel are obsessed with event books. Casuals don't drop them.
I can't in good conscience recommend any of those Image titles. So I'll say Manifest Destiny, Birthright, and Rumble.
As of a week ago, yes
While it can help, I really don't think the writer name on the book matters too much to the average comic book reader as long as the book isn't trash. People just want the old characters to be in the forefront among other things.Some of those numbers are very interesting. Especially the relaunched titles that did not surpass the second issue of their last volume, like Ultimates. And the books that did not benefit at all from CWII tie-ins and arguably suffered...this part we've known about for awhile but it's really something to see all the data together like this.
That's a huge shift in the way people buy Marvel comics. It was once commonly accepted that, for the big 2, a) events sell (obviously still true) b) event tie-ins can give books a boost and c) #1s sell. The latter two points seem to be changing dramatically. While some books with CWII tie-ins did get a boost, others continued on a normal downward trend or even took a hit and most ended up right where they started or lower by the time the tie-in wrapped. A shiny #1 did not help some books at all, like wow at that Ultimates relaunch.
I think Xavier is right in that their scorched earth tactics are largely to blame, especially all the damn events right on top of each other. But I do wonder if staying loyal to one family of titles so you can always pick up all of the tie-ins for the events is still a thing that people do. That was common practice in the '90s...so if that's true Marvel should be freaking out right now. That's not where they should aspire to be creatively and it's a path to financial doom.
Kinda blows mind that Marvel is letting OML die despite it being one of the most stable solo titles in their entire line. Maybe Lemire doesn't want to do it anymore...if that's the case you find someone else to fucking do it. That's how it's always been done and I don't get why they've stopped doing it. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't but you gotta give it a shot at least.
On the more ordinary side of things, there are the always frustrating cases of fresh ideas and characters doing poorly, and the legit depressing spread between, say, Sam and Steve, like even with that huge blowup over the first issue of Steve Rogers that book is doing much better than Sam Wilson which is easily the better Cap book. But there are a few bright spots here and there, I'm pleased with how Moon Knight is doing, and DoX doing well despite being agonizingly terrible gives me hope they won't keep Scott and Emma off the board for very long
In general though it's obvious Marvel has lost a lot of trust and is leaning on talent readers don't actually care about that much, like Waid and, sorry to say, Ewing.
I hate to say it, a lot of good things have happened under his watch, but it might be time for Alonso to go. It might be time for new leadership.
So with Uncanny Inhumans being cancelled in favor of Royals and Black Bolt, will Soule do some other Marvel book or is he gone for now?
IvX is limited, and I'd assume Poe is as well. I suppose the big question is how long his DD run will go? People were super down on it at the start, but apparently this new arc is pretty sickYou do realize that he's writing Daredevil, Poe Dameron, and IvX, right?
IvX is limited, and I'd assume Poe is as well. I suppose the big question is how long his DD run will go? People were super down on it at the start, but apparently this new arc is pretty sick
Does Scarlet Witch 2016 improve? Because I just finished Issue 2 and this is the most boring thing I've read in years.
I'm only stuck to it because I'm a Wanda mark.
I think Axel pushed to hard on diversity and younger gen and it's ultimately backfiring. You can have the young guard but when you start killing off heroes to make way for them, you burn off the people you want to stick with and see why the new kid deserves that push.
Ms Marvel and Nova are examples of it succeeding. Yeah, Sam started out as a Gary Stu but once Duggan and Ryan got their hands on him, he wasn't a complete tool.
Silk is basically Spider Girl 5 but has carved out a niche for herself.
I'm not saying stoping pandering to the assholes/old assholes or the diversity/Tumblr people but have a balance.
And then, the events, there's a reason 2008-2014, the events weren't stacked like a Arbys sandwich, they had a balance. Sure some missed the mark but the tie in ratio was either low or had their own minis. Then Secret Wars stopped the momentum and CW2 decided every book had to at least have one tie in.
Axel I think deserves that flak and I think it's time he needs to go. Will we stop seeing diversity pushed and everything goes back to the same shit after he leaves? Who knows? I think Brevoort might take the reigns if the shit goes down.
Flow looks at sales.
DR STRANGE SORCERERS SUPREME
10/16 Dr Strange Sorcerers Supreme #1 - 149,710
11/16 Dr Strange Sorcerers Supreme #2 - 29,349 (-80.4%)
Sorcerers supreme had it coming. I was excited for this book but ended up dropping it after reading #2.
OCCUPY AVENGERS
11/16 Occupy Avengers - 38,400
not too surprising. the issue was solid, but nobody wants to read about a guy who killed Bruce Banner. still picking up #2
10/16 Champions #1 - 334,937 [+6,772]
11/16 Champions #2 - 49,733 (-85.2%)
damn at those champions numbers.
That's good to hear, hopefully you get it all relatively soon. I don't think I have the patience for that kind of thing even if the end product is great.
He's still under exclusive contract I think so he will probably have an unannounced book coming.So with Uncanny Inhumans being cancelled in favor of Royals and Black Bolt, will Soule do some other Marvel book or is he gone for now?
Isnt he writing Darth Maul?
Keep in mind each issue is a different story.Does Scarlet Witch 2016 improve? Because I just finished Issue 2 and this is the most boring thing I've read in years.
Keep in mind each issue is a different story.
Some of those numbers are very interesting. Especially the relaunched titles that did not surpass the second issue of their last volume, like Ultimates. And the books that did not benefit at all from CWII tie-ins and arguably suffered...this part we've known about for awhile but it's really something to see all the data together like this.
That's a huge shift in the way people buy Marvel comics. It was once commonly accepted that, for the big 2, a) events sell (obviously still true) b) event tie-ins can give books a boost and c) #1s sell. The latter two points seem to be changing dramatically. While some books with CWII tie-ins did get a boost, others continued on a normal downward trend or even took a hit and most ended up right where they started or lower by the time the tie-in wrapped. A shiny #1 did not help some books at all, like wow at that Ultimates relaunch.
I think Xavier is right in that their scorched earth tactics are largely to blame, especially all the damn events right on top of each other. But I do wonder if staying loyal to one family of titles so you can always pick up all of the tie-ins for the events is still a thing that people do. That was common practice in the '90s...so if that's true Marvel should be freaking out right now. That's not where they should aspire to be creatively and it's a path to financial doom.
Kinda blows mind that Marvel is letting OML die despite it being one of the most stable solo titles in their entire line. Maybe Lemire doesn't want to do it anymore...if that's the case you find someone else to fucking do it. That's how it's always been done and I don't get why they've stopped doing it. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't but you gotta give it a shot at least.
On the more ordinary side of things, there are the always frustrating cases of fresh ideas and characters doing poorly, and the legit depressing spread between, say, Sam and Steve, like even with that huge blowup over the first issue of Steve Rogers that book is doing much better than Sam Wilson which is easily the better Cap book. But there are a few bright spots here and there, I'm pleased with how Moon Knight is doing, and DoX doing well despite being agonizingly terrible gives me hope they won't keep Scott and Emma off the board for very long
In general though it's obvious Marvel has lost a lot of trust and is leaning on talent readers don't actually care about that much, like Waid and, sorry to say, Ewing.
I hate to say it, a lot of good things have happened under his watch, but it might be time for Alonso to go. It might be time for new leadership.
You shitting on Death Vigil? I will stab you
He'll be the Dan Slott of DaredevilPoe Dameron is an ongoing and Daredevil will probably stick around until he's done with whatever story he wants to tell.
First real bad experience for me. Has hurt my love of their work if I am honest. I almost don't care what I get now.
I've had some truly wonderful experiences with commissions though (Sejic, Elsa Charretier, Mirka Andolfo, Sanford Greene) so it's all good.
Following up on this, I did grab the rest of the issues I needed to "complete" Claremont's run here (which it turns out was ALSO missing the annuals in this sale, so that's even more to pick up late). Though let me ask: are either of his returns (381-389, 444-473) at all worth bothering with? Or are any other following runs on the title worth grabbing? Like, is the stuff right after Claremont gets off the title any good? (I've actually read most of the stuff that's right before this sale ends. Like, a lot of the stuff where they relocate to right off the coast of California or whatever.)
Looking through the March solicits and DC gets some Rocafort time and they use him to pump up Red Hood and Outlaws? Amazing. Matias Bergara drawing Supergirl should be amazing though.
DC solicits for March - http://www.cbr.com/dc-comics-march-2017-solicitations/
JRJR doing a stint on Suicide Squad.
Rocafort has collabed with Lobdel many times before on different titles so I see why.Looking through the March solicits and DC gets some Rocafort time and they use him to pump up Red Hood and Outlaws? Amazing. Matias Bergara drawing Supergirl should be the good kind of amazing though.
Looking through the March solicits and DC gets some Rocafort time and they use him to pump up Red Hood and Outlaws? Amazing. Matias Bergara drawing Supergirl should be the good kind of amazing though.
Dodson Harley
I.....WAT
I think Axel pushed to hard on diversity and younger gen and it's ultimately backfiring. You can have the young guard but when you start killing off heroes to make way for them, you burn off the people you want to stick with and see why the new kid deserves that push.
You're not the only one that thinks this. It's a common refrain on the internet, but it just doesn't make sense to me. This argument conflates diversity with "not-the-status-quo." In your example, you cited Nova Sam, who last I checked, was still a hetero white dude. Marvel's "problem" is not "pushing too hard on diversity." It gets them great mainstream press and could potentially attract new readers. Unfortunately, Marvel just pisses that all away once people pick up the book.
Marvel's method for launching books is spinning them out of crossovers, which is so counter to bringing in new readers. So even if you were interested in a new book, the fact that it starts smack dab in a crossover of other characters would scare you off. Like Spider-Woman's first issue starting right in the middle of Spider-verse. That did the book dirty, because the actual first issue, the issue that serves as a pilot for the actual themes of the book is Spider-Woman #5. These new books aren't given the chance to establish their own voices or themes, shortchanged for the quick crossover buck.
Legacy heroes are my jam! It's what made the DCU so great in the '90s. And for Marvel, it's a great way to squeeze new stories out of old IP. I mean, how many more sad Bruce Banner sad because he's an angry monster stories do we really need? A new group of young heroes from diverse backgrounds taking up the names of older heroes opens up new stories.
Marvel spins the characters out of other books because it brings more attention to them from fans and even then we have examples like Mosaic. Right now there are people complaining about the more familiar characters taking a backseat and the legacy versions aren't as popular for various reasons.You're not the only one that thinks this. It's a common refrain on the internet, but it just doesn't make sense to me. This argument conflates diversity with "not-the-status-quo." In your example, you cited Nova Sam, who last I checked, was still a hetero white dude. Marvel's "problem" is not "pushing too hard on diversity." It gets them great mainstream press and could potentially attract new readers. Unfortunately, Marvel just pisses that all away once people pick up the book.
Marvel's method for launching books is spinning them out of crossovers, which is so counter to bringing in new readers. So even if you were interested in a new book, the fact that it starts smack dab in a crossover of other characters would scare you off. Like Spider-Woman's first issue starting right in the middle of Spider-verse. That did the book dirty, because the actual first issue, the issue that serves as a pilot for the actual themes of the book is Spider-Woman #5. These new books aren't given the chance to establish their own voices or themes, shortchanged for the quick crossover buck.
Legacy heroes are my jam! It's what made the DCU so great in the '90s. And for Marvel, it's a great way to squeeze new stories out of old IP. I mean, how many more sad Bruce Banner sad because he's an angry monster stories do we really need? A new group of young heroes from diverse backgrounds taking up the names of older heroes opens up new stories.
And before anybody else says, "But as minorities, wouldn't you rather have your own heroes?" Naw. We're here to take your spouses, jobs and now superheroes.