Paid of course. 3D only, which sucked, but was an avant premiere so it was ok. Gonna watch the 2D version next friday.To those who watched it. Did you guys watch free screenings or did you have to pay?
Paid. It was an early screening.To those who watched it. Did you guys watch free screenings or did you have to pay?
To those who watched it. Did you guys watch free screenings or did you have to pay?
Of course not. This is a real film. Real films need no post credits scenes.Can I get further confirmation there was nothing tacked on at the last minute in terms of mid or post credits?
To those who watched it. Did you guys watch free screenings or did you have to pay?
I give the side eye to people who say the Extended Cut of Suicide Squad is better than the theatrical cut. It has the opposite problem that BvS does. The longer runtime actually hurts.
Nah, the movie can't have worse pacing, so the extented bar scene is a plus for me. Plus, I didn't hare Leto's Joker.I give the side eye to people who say the Extended Cut of Suicide Squad is better than the theatrical cut. It has the opposite problem that BvS does. The longer runtime actually hurts.
Ooh, this gets me excited.Oh my God that was FUCKING FANTASTIC
Sweet baby Jesus I was not ready. I WAS NOT READY.
So much heart, so much character, so much... Innocence. Even the supposed bad final part was orgasmic.
Yeah, Ares had really hammy dialogue, and so did the other two BUT it was so theatrical at that moment I didn't care .
And the drama, oh God the drama. I teared up in parts. so many emotions.
I bow to Patty Jenkins.
Of course not. This is a real film. Real films need no post credits scenes.
If you have a bit of child spirit inside of you, yes. It's a bit like Harry Potter 1-2, or Fantastic Beasts.But would you recommend it to someone who doesn't want to pay actual money to watch the movie?
If you have a bit of child spirit inside of you, yes. It's a bit like Harry Potter 1-2, or Fantastic Beasts.
If you're expecting Logan or The Dark Knight, stay out.
The narrative that Patty Jenkins directing this is somehow risky on WB's part is so stupid. The MCU is made up of male directors with less credentials than her prior to their debuts in the universe.
To those who watched it. Did you guys watch free screenings or did you have to pay?
who in the hell are these magical mcu directors you're talking about lol? all of them had made at least a few films prior to signing on, not just one film 14 years prior. aside from Alan Taylor who coincidentally replaced Jenkins for Thor 2.
In this thread we behave ourselves, thank you. No disrespecting each other.Quit being stupid.
In this thread we behave ourselves, thank you. No disrespecting each other.
I think Patty was hard to classify. Yes, her only movie was great. But it was like 20 years ago. And was not a Blockbuster. And was not based on a character (well, it technically was, but you know what I mean, there are no fans of that killer woman), hell, it was not even an action movie.Meh. Fixed.
I just really hate how male indie directors stay getting bumped up, but the same doesn't happen to women. And then people try and justify that behavior. It's beyond stupid.
Captain Underpants still dont got reviews
And I think parents would be more inclined to take kids to the empowering Wonder Woman than a cartoon flick anyways!
100 MILLIONS
Fuck man, I LOVED Fantastic Beasts. That's so cool. Now I'm getting good vibrations.If you have a bit of child spirit inside of you, yes. It's a bit like Harry Potter 1-2, or Fantastic Beasts.
If you're expecting Logan or The Dark Knight, stay out.
The Russo Bros. biggest claim to fame was a Community episode. They're the biggest directors in the MCU now. Gunn had Slither, I guess. Whedon was primarily a TV director, and was saddled with Avengers.
Patty wrote and directed a movie that won an Oscar. She was Emmy nominated for another one. What are you talking about?
ah right. forgot about russos for a sec. was just focusing on stuff like iron man,cap, thor, hulk etc. etc.
regardless, it was pretty reasonable to have doubts about Patty. on whether or not she'd be rusty. 14 years without a feature film is a long time, but whatever it worked out great and she proved people wrong. i imagine her career is gonna blow up now.
I wish Neogaf was around when Kubrick took long gaps between films.
ah right. forgot about russos for a sec. was just focusing on stuff like iron man,cap, thor, hulk etc. etc.
regardless, it was pretty reasonable to have doubts about Patty. on whether or not she'd be rusty. 14 years without a feature film is a long time, but whatever it worked out great and she proved people wrong. i imagine her career is gonna blow up now.
I still haven't seen Monster (but I will this weekend), so yes, you can have your doubts about Jenkins. I had them too.
Monster is fantastic. I watched it when I was like 8 or 9 and left a mark on my taste. Really poignant, no barrels hold movie. Charlize is a tour de force, and Ricci was also wonderful. That's what I was in team Jenkins since I read the headline.
You prefer to watch it alone?
I hate when people ask me if I wanna go see this fucking movie together.
Considering they have only Aquaman for next year, why would that bother anyone?Where would Would wondy 2 even go? DC has like 10 films in development right now. Their plate is already kinda full, unless they make something work.
Where would Would wondy 2 even go? DC has like 10 films in development right now. Their plate is already kinda full, unless they make something work.