I disagree. And seeing as neither of us can prove that the other is wrong, that's all there is to it.
No we cant factually, but if you just LOOK at the games you see how they are technically very similar. Both games have the same variable resolution, same shadowing techniques, some of the same visual effects like smoke and how it looks around the edges of characters, same difference in image quality between 360 and PS3. Its easy to tell they are using the same tools.
You can tell when a game is running on UE3 for example, because of those common things. But since I cant point you to a comment by the developer where they state its the same toolset, ill just leave it at that.
This isn't necessarily true. Optimizations could have been done and the design of the game itself also effects how the game can perform.
Sad thing is I don't need a big crazy difference to want one version over the other. =p I just have this OCD thing with getting the better version.
It shares similarities to the engine used in NG3 such as FXAA and dynamic resolution. Ever since NG1, Team Ninja has used the same engine for all of their games, so I don't expect that to change now.
If its an OCD thing, going by the alpha demo your going to want to get the ps3 version. Team Ninja has created new toolsets between generation on Xbox DOA3, and NG used the same engine, then they created new tools for DOAX2 and used that in DOA2U. On 360, they used a new engine for DOA4, NG2, and DOAX2. They created a new toolset for NG Sigma and sigma 2. The latest set was optimized for multiple platforms and is used in NG3 and DOA5.
