I mean, it should receive that. It's still the same game, but prettier. I though 89 in metacritic for DeS back in 2009 was fair, especially in an era before DaS, perhaps even a bit low. I still think both of them are around a 9/10, due to my own preference for DeS's levels. Bosses are way dated, even as puzzle bosses. I mean, if a 2009 plain remake beats out the other titles of the series, sans Bloodborne, there's either been something wrong with every subsequent game in the series or reviewers are definitely caught into hype and overrating it. I feel like the user reviews are much fairer, hanging around 8.8/10, which is still high, but seems more sensible.
Maybe a lot of reviewers are new to the series though, which I could see would make them rate DeS very highly if it's their first Soulsborne experience. It was my third or fourth and it was definitely special, though most of the community has prefered DaS.
I never played them original but I've seen videos and visually demon souls 2020 is gorgeous compared to the original but after playing for about an hour I can't say it's a next gen showpiece. Visually the game could be done on a ps4pro or one X. It's a good game though.
Tell me why not? God of war and horizon look better to me.Not this again. No it couldn’t.
A game without review bombing is like a celebrity without death threats:They've started to review bomb Demon Soul's on Meta
That 90+ rating is offensive to some.
Tell me why not? God of war and horizon look better to me.
0Alright, you win. +1 respect.
God of War have places with lows textures and the FPS is no where near as smooth as Demon's Souls even on performance modeTell me why not? God of war and horizon look better to me.
Huh... Gotta disagree with that one. Nothing looks as good as demons souls imo, especially at 60fps. Nothing on PS4 pro looks anything like that. Not GOW, not spiderman, not TLOU2.I never played them original but I've seen videos and visually demon souls 2020 is gorgeous compared to the original but after playing for about an hour I can't say it's a next gen showpiece. Visually the game could be done on a ps4pro or one X. It's a good game though.
I'm saying that God of war and horizon look just as good if not better in areas. I see no reason why demon souls can't be on ps4 proGod of War have places with lows textures and the FPS is no where near as smooth as Demon's Souls even on performance mode
If you are talking God of War having more detail character model, yes because games with established character will always have more detailed than avatar in character creation.
I agree with that dude. Obviously at 1080p/30fps, but my guess is that it could be done.Not this again. No it couldn’t.
I'm saying that God of war and horizon look just as good if not better in areas. I see no reason why demon souls can't be on ps4 pro
Myles Morales is a secret SSX gameSSX for PS2 says hello
...it could. The stuff that makes DS look so good - lightning - is prebaked.Not this again. No it couldn’t.
C'mon. Let's be real hommie. When it comes to launch line up. There's only one console in the game here.Extremely strong launch title. Probably will be the highest rated launch title of both systems.
C'mon. Let's be real hommie. When it comes to launch line up. There's only one console in the game here.
Because the FPS wouldn't as smooth as what we currently have and long load times with each death and going to new areas.I see no reason why demon souls can't be on ps4 pro
I never played them original but I've seen videos and visually demon souls 2020 is gorgeous compared to the original but after playing for about an hour I can't say it's a next gen showpiece. Visually the game could be done on a ps4pro or one X. It's a good game though.
I'm saying that God of war and horizon look just as good if not better in areas. I see no reason why demon souls can't be on ps4 pro
Well I get what the guy is trying to say and to an extent I agree. These launch titles dont look like a next gen leap. They look more like going from High settings to Ultra. So yes, this stuff couldn't be achieved on PS4 as in it probably wouldn't be able to run properly but graphically it looks like any good looking current gen title. Same goes for Miles Morales, the RT looks great but overall it does look like an expansion and not a compeltely different title. Horizon 2 looks crisp and vibrant but again, it doesnt look THAT much better than the original besides better textures and 4K. For reference check out the difference between Killzone 3 and Killzone Shadows Fall. Thats called a next gen leap. But then again, the further we go the visual fidelity will be less and less from generation to generation.
Yes it could.Not this again. No it couldn’t.
Huh... Gotta disagree with that one. Nothing looks as good as demons souls imo, especially at 60fps. Nothing on PS4 pro looks anything like that. Not GOW, not spiderman, not TLOU2.
Demons is the only next gen game that looks like a next gen game. I think it's currently the best looking game ever?
No, it literally cannot, not at the visual level on display. A PS4 Pro or One X can't handle the asset sizes as it is much more limited in terms of asset streaming by an order of magnitude, it can't handle the high resolution textures, the amount of particles on screen, the 3D models with such a high triangle count, the realtime shadow calculation and so on and so forth.
If you like the design of Kratos or the design of the techno dinos in Horizon, that's fine, but technically this game is on another level.
Why do you think a game at it's maximum settings can't be downgraded for lower end systems? The 3rd party AAA games do this all the time with the PC downgrading graphics features to the consoles.
You can absolutely run this game on a PS4Pro.
1) Downres the textures only by 50% (i..e 4k -> 2k)
I've just watched ign's, gamespot's and easy allies' reviews back to back and the game looks absolutely amazing.
what i don't understand is praising the game, not saying anything bad and then giving a review score of 9/10?
like why? why not give the game a perfect score if you think the game is perfect.
is this an integrity thing? what is the reason behind this dumb scoring mentality?
i literally only care about individual channel's review like videogamedunkey. at least his scores and feelings towards a game align with each other.
Its a remake of a 2009 game. Besides graphics upgrade it’s pretty much the same as I understand.
Getting 9’s instead of 10’s are pretty valid to me.
The biggest prevention from it being a 10 is we've seen evolutions of the formula in Dark Souls and Bloodbornebut aren't we creating a platform where remakes and remasters are reviewed out of 9, by accepting these scores as valid?
i mean from the looks of it, bluepoint put a lot of work and effort into building this remake from a ps3 game and i feel like in a way, their 2+ year commitment to a big project is diminished and not appreciated.
also a lot of the reviews i mentioned talks highly about the gameplay improvement bluepoint made in addition to graphics update.
p.s. maybe diminish is a strong word since the scores are generally high but i really dispise hearing all praise then seeing a cut score as if 10/10's belong to an exclusive club of games like they are the royalty.
p.ss also i see your point.
It's not just texture size, the amount of information the system is streaming in from the SSD is much higher than what would be possible from the HDD and that's aside from the much lower RAM amount, so the asset variety would suffer a lot. Already just that change would change the look of the game by quite a bit.
The Kratos for God of War (PS4) has 80,000 polygons in total, with 32,000 for the face – 30x what we had for the PS2 models.
“That allowed us to create systems that could deform that geometry and achieve a level of detail for the muscles that we couldn’t do before. On top of that, we used a combination of layers of normal maps for smaller wrinkles and pores that we weren’t able to use in past generations because of the limitation of textures. Kratos (PS4) uses over 140 textures.”
Then you reduce particles, texture variety, the polygon models would also need to be simplified (the PS4 Pro can't handle as many polygon counts as the PS5, I don't know why you say this) and then you end up having a game that looks quite a bit different.
yeah i get that. maybe i just have a problem with the wording of these reviews. i don't know.The biggest prevention from it being a 10 is we've seen evolutions of the formula in Dark Souls and Bloodborne
Still a phenomenal game though
My argument still stands that I believe this game can still be run on a PS4 easily and still look relatively the same. I also don't think this game is the best looking PS game ever made. I'm shocked that you guys would throw every single AAA developer that makes exclusives for the PS under the bus for best graphics when there is so much more to the graphics systems with the other games. Capsule AO in UC4/TLOU2 is still a better approximation and looks better than the typical AO that is used in this game, for example.