• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided I Review Thread I I asked for this

nOoblet16

Member
12 hours with 90% of the side quests... Somethings seems off but eh.

He said that while he did go on killing sprees at times he also used vents a lot to skip encounters and areas which meant he went through the levels fast.

You can go through any DE game quite quickly if you do that and 12 hours is actually quite reasonable in that sense.
 

Taelus

Member
It depends what game journalists are offended by that particular day. MD devs expected a rational discussion from an irrational medium.

It's one thing to just disagree, but I don't think dismissing criticism as "people just being offended" helps facilitate a rational discussion.
 

De_Legend

Banned
He said that while he did go on killing sprees at times he also used vents a lot to skip encounters and areas which meant he went through the levels fast.

You can go through any DE game quite quickly if you do that and 12 hours is actually quite reasonable in that sense.

True, you can skip a lot of stuff in those games.
 

Tovarisc

Member
Mafia 3 is drawing from the realities of a time and place, Deus Ex is hamfistedly referencing real life atrocities to try and make their fictional narrative seem more meaningful by association. Pretty different.

If racism ends up being shallow and hamfisted game mechanic in Mafia 3 I don't think it can get free pass just because "Well at least they tried within realities of a time and place". If they fuck up handling that topic then they need get called out on it, but we don't know yet as game isn't out. What devs have said about mechanic doesn't sound that much better than MD's on-the-nose approach of its topics.

What do you carry over to NG+ ?

Augs afaik
 
Also sounds like the non-stealth combat isn't amazing, surprising since that's the thing they said they were really overhauling.

The reviews mention the story is disappointing, not non-existent. I'd be really surprised if its this years MGSV.

I don't know, if the the game feels like it's missing a last act or like content has been cut out I could see that being a valid comparison. I hope not, but we'll see.

If racism ends up being shallow and hamfisted game mechanic in Mafia 3 I don't think it can get free pass just because "Well at least they tried within realities of a time and place". If they fuck up handling that topic then they need get called out on it, but we don't know yet as game isn't out. What devs have said about mechanic doesn't sound that much better than MD's on-the-nose approach of its topics.

Well sure, but I hope you see why people are more willing to give Mafia 3 the benefit of the doubt for the time being. At least they haven't been so in-your-face edgy with it in the marketing.
 
Watching UPF right now, Jeff says that the side quests are where the game's story is. Main arc is too video gamey and generic.

Jeff Gerstmann talking about MD on UPF. Some of the stuff he's talking about with regards to sidequests sounds great. Apparently there are some sidequests/stories that span almost the entire game. He says the side stuff is much more compelling than the main story.
TW3 2.0?
 

Yeah, I thought of The Witcher 3, too. Great side content, meh main story arc.

Ehh, that's the same bit of horseshit I heard with XBX and I ended up being bored to tears, I hope that's not the case here.

I think a lot of games have a mediocre main story, but gread side stories. Just because they're smaller in scope so you can focus more on telling a simple little story. Haven't played XBX.
 

GhaleonEB

Member
I loved Human Revolution, but this has been totally off my radar. Well, everything has been, I've been super busy. The reviews, and Edge's in particular, have me tempted to blind purchase in a week or so.
 

If anything, it reminds me of how Assassin's Creed Brotherhood scaled things down to one central more-detailed setting (as opposed to Assassin's Creed 2's and Human Revolution's multiple cities), tweaks the gameplay to improve it in some key ways, provides some deeply rewarding power boosts, but doesn't necessarily do much to move the story forward. I think this is their "make sure we completely nail the gameplay and level/quest design" game and I'm fine with that.
 
ibn Saïd;214294635 said:
what rig did he play on? and did he report specific performances?

I think he had a 980 ? Don't know if he already upgraded to a 1070.

He could've also played it on their office PC's, which have 770s and one has a 970.
 
Man... the common complaint about the story being a disappointment and falling short of Human Revolution's has really kind of stymied my hype. I was so drawn into Human Revolution's world and narrative setup by that first E3 trailer and the story eventually told within the game itself, and I had kind of assumed/expected that Mankind Divided would act as a natural extension of or conclusion to the conspiracies introduced in Human Revolution... but the reviews kind of make it sound like that's not the case and Mankind Divided's story feels smaller and less ambitious.

It's great to hear that the gameplay is fantastic, but I pretty much knew it would be and that's not what I primarily care about going into Mankind Divided. Human Revolution is almost the last kind of game I would ever choose to play because I normally can't stand FPSs or stealth in general, but the story in HR was just so damn great that I was able to embrace the gameplay.

If the story isn't as much of a driving force in Mankind Divided, I don't know if just the gameplay will carry me through it. My gaming time is so limited these days too that I can't exactly just take a chance on it and hope the story pans out for me, so... man.

I've been so hyped for this game... not sure what to think now. Looking forward to hearing GAF's impressions.
 

Tovarisc

Member
ibn Saïd;214294536 said:
seems like it. witcher 3 main story is good but some of the side quests were fucking amazing, especially the red baron quest line. maybe mankind divided is similar.

Red Baron stuff is tied directly to main storyline, not side quest imo. Maybe brightest star, moment, of main storyline when it comes to writing and execution.
 

nOoblet16

Member
Well sure, but I hope you see why people are more willing to give Mafia 3 the benefit of the doubt for the time being. At least they haven't been so in-your-face edgy with it in the marketing.


Well do you really blame them considering in Deus Ex the plot centres around it and it's right up there in the name while in Mafia it's just an added detail?
 
ibn Saïd;214294536 said:
seems like it. witcher 3 main story is good but some of the side quests were fucking amazing, especially the red baron quest line. maybe mankind divided is similar.

Red Baron is part of the main story.
 

Deadly Cyclone

Pride of Iowa State
I have the game, it's solid overall. Much deeper systems than the previous and the stealth and levels are better. More verticality, etc. Runs solid on PC as well.
 

steven28

Member
Some slightly underwhelming reviews there but some great scores as well.The game should be here tomorrow so i can judge for myself.
 

Corpekata

Banned
Bloody Baron was part of the main quest but a good chunk of his story is in optional quests.

That's what Witcher 3's strongest side content was, it was often part of the main quest, if only briefly, and then it let you decide if you wanted to continue with it.
 

CHC

Member
The reviews mention the story is disappointing, not non-existent. I'd be really surprised if its this years MGSV.

I doubt it will be. The actual story in Human Revolution was nothing particularly special, its strengths lay elsewhere. Mankind Divided will be the same, and that's fine. This really sounds like one of the most cut and dry sequels I have ever heard of - more or less the same strengths and weaknesses as its predecessor.
 
Tin Foil Hat On:
This might be the reasoning for the so-called abrupt ending in MD. Apparently they are tracking our decisions in the game to plan for a possible sequel. This could explain why the story just stopped abruptly? Also could allude to Jim Sterling's previous comments about how this game was chopped up into 3 games and MD is now "part 1" of the trilogy?

"Eidos Montreal reveals it has learned from its mistake with Deus Ex: Human Revolution, and will track all your decisions in its sequel, Mankind Divided."

Q: "Human Revolution had a couple of endings. Did you ever consider tracking player's choices in that game so the ending could transfer to Mankind Divided?"

A: "For the previous game, Human Revolution, we didn't have any technology to track your actions. When we started Mankind Divided, we felt we needed to take a bit of truth from all the four endings so players could feel that, 'okay, this kind of makes sense for me.' Plus we kept things a bit more mysterious to start Mankind Divided, saying that such a big event would probably suffer from a lot of misinformation from civilians and the news.
As for this new game, we don't know whether there will be another Deus Ex game or not. However, we are tracking your choices and the consequences in Mankind Divided. When you're done, we seal your save game file with everything that you've done and that's gonna give us the option in the future. If we’re lucky enough to work on a sequel, we can use that as a stepping stone for you to come in and continue where you left off. So we have changed our approach to tracking your progress."
 
Bloody Baron was part of the main quest but a good chunk of his story is in optional quests.

Only the final portion of his storyline is optional. It's an important one, to be sure, but it's only one optional quest. The rest of the Bloody Baron story is part of the critical quest line.
 

Effect

Member
Red Baron is part of the main story.

This. It spins off a side story quest line after a certain point and that's depended upon you but the bulk of it is part of the main story. I always get confused when someone says the whole thing was a side story and question if I was wrong. So if Mankind Divided is like that that's fine. From some of the trailers it seems you have more freedom to explore and what you do determines how things could unfold or what you could stumble upon. The Prague demo has the devs outright say this as they're running through it. They mentioned if they went one way it would trigger a mission/quest that might last an hour but take you away from what you were originally trying to do I believe or another way would cause things to unfold a different way for example.

I would imagine or hope that the more side stuff you do the more that might influence the ending or maybe even the main story or just the world around you. One of the things I wanted more off when I played Deus Ex Human Revolution was more of the world. For all the freedom you might have in a given level it's overall a pretty linear game.
 
Tin Foil Hat On:
This might be the reasoning for the so-called abrupt ending in MD. Apparently they are tracking our decisions in the game to plan for a possible sequel. This could explain why the story just stopped abruptly? Also could allude to Jim Sterling's previous comments about how this game was chopped up into 3 games and MD is now "part 1" of the trilogy?

"Eidos Montreal reveals it has learned from its mistake with Deus Ex: Human Revolution, and will track all your decisions in its sequel, Mankind Divided."

Q: "Human Revolution had a couple of endings. Did you ever consider tracking player's choices in that game so the ending could transfer to Mankind Divided?"

A: "For the previous game, Human Revolution, we didn't have any technology to track your actions. When we started Mankind Divided, we felt we needed to take a bit of truth from all the four endings so players could feel that, 'okay, this kind of makes sense for me.' Plus we kept things a bit more mysterious to start Mankind Divided, saying that such a big event would probably suffer from a lot of misinformation from civilians and the news.
As for this new game, we don't know whether there will be another Deus Ex game or not. However, we are tracking your choices and the consequences in Mankind Divided. When you're done, we seal your save game file with everything that you've done and that's gonna give us the option in the future. If we’re lucky enough to work on a sequel, we can use that as a stepping stone for you to come in and continue where you left off. So we have changed our approach to tracking your progress."

We already know there will be a new trilogy to come with the Deus Ex Universe stuff. MD was always supposed to be part 1, so if Jim Sterling's statement is actually true, that would mean part 1 of the DE trilogy is getting split up into 3 parts.
 
Top Bottom