Laurentius
Member
tsLhC
Last edited:
The highest difficult is called "I never asked for this" (for real).
When most reviews state 30 hours to beat, I have to call some sort of bullshit on him doing it in 12 hours
Sweet Jesus I hope not. Narrative wise, MGSV is my biggest disappointment in quite some time.Deus Ex: Storyline divided. Phantom Pain of 2016 it seems.
12 hours with 90% of the side quests... Somethings seems off but eh.
It depends what game journalists are offended by that particular day. MD devs expected a rational discussion from an irrational medium.
He said that while he did go on killing sprees at times he also used vents a lot to skip encounters and areas which meant he went through the levels fast.
You can go through any DE game quite quickly if you do that and 12 hours is actually quite reasonable in that sense.
Mafia 3 is drawing from the realities of a time and place, Deus Ex is hamfistedly referencing real life atrocities to try and make their fictional narrative seem more meaningful by association. Pretty different.
What do you carry over to NG+ ?
What do you carry over to NG+ ?
The reviews mention the story is disappointing, not non-existent. I'd be really surprised if its this years MGSV.
If racism ends up being shallow and hamfisted game mechanic in Mafia 3 I don't think it can get free pass just because "Well at least they tried within realities of a time and place". If they fuck up handling that topic then they need get called out on it, but we don't know yet as game isn't out. What devs have said about mechanic doesn't sound that much better than MD's on-the-nose approach of its topics.
Watching UPF right now, Jeff says that the side quests are where the game's story is. Main arc is too video gamey and generic.
TW3 2.0?Jeff Gerstmann talking about MD on UPF. Some of the stuff he's talking about with regards to sidequests sounds great. Apparently there are some sidequests/stories that span almost the entire game. He says the side stuff is much more compelling than the main story.
Ehh, that's the same bit of horseshit I heard with XBX and I ended up being bored to tears, I hope that's not the case here.Watching UPF right now, Jeff says that the side quests are where the game's story is. Main arc is too video gamey and generic.
TW3 2.0?
Ehh, that's the same bit of horseshit I heard with XBX and I ended up being bored to tears, I hope that's not the case here.
I think this'll probably have some postgame DLC.
Utterly delighted to hear that it's got new game plus, by the way.
TW3 2.0?
Also, Jeff's review was done fully on PC, and he just said the port is fine.
TW3 2.0?
ibn Saïd;214294635 said:what rig did he play on? and did he report specific performances?
ibn Saïd;214294536 said:seems like it. witcher 3 main story is good but some of the side quests were fucking amazing, especially the red baron quest line. maybe mankind divided is similar.
Well sure, but I hope you see why people are more willing to give Mafia 3 the benefit of the doubt for the time being. At least they haven't been so in-your-face edgy with it in the marketing.
ibn Saïd;214294536 said:seems like it. witcher 3 main story is good but some of the side quests were fucking amazing, especially the red baron quest line. maybe mankind divided is similar.
Red Baron is awful to me (ymmv), so I'm hoping W3 elements don't seep into other games like this one. Let CDPR fans wait for Cyberpunk.Red Baron is part of the main story.
Just going to put it out there. I don't really agree right now with the main story versus sides at all.
Yea sorry...fixed itDid you mean to quote someone else? Not sure how your comment applies to what I said.
Still working on it all right now.When is your review going to be up? Are you enjoying the story?
Still working on it all right now.
The reviews mention the story is disappointing, not non-existent. I'd be really surprised if its this years MGSV.
Eh? You don't agree that the story isn't that great, or you don't agree with the story of the game.Just going to put it out there. I don't really agree right now with the main story versus sides at all.
Bloody Baron was part of the main quest but a good chunk of his story is in optional quests.
Red Baron is part of the main story.
Tin Foil Hat On:
This might be the reasoning for the so-called abrupt ending in MD. Apparently they are tracking our decisions in the game to plan for a possible sequel. This could explain why the story just stopped abruptly? Also could allude to Jim Sterling's previous comments about how this game was chopped up into 3 games and MD is now "part 1" of the trilogy?
"Eidos Montreal reveals it has learned from its mistake with Deus Ex: Human Revolution, and will track all your decisions in its sequel, Mankind Divided."
Q: "Human Revolution had a couple of endings. Did you ever consider tracking player's choices in that game so the ending could transfer to Mankind Divided?"
A: "For the previous game, Human Revolution, we didn't have any technology to track your actions. When we started Mankind Divided, we felt we needed to take a bit of truth from all the four endings so players could feel that, 'okay, this kind of makes sense for me.' Plus we kept things a bit more mysterious to start Mankind Divided, saying that such a big event would probably suffer from a lot of misinformation from civilians and the news.
As for this new game, we don't know whether there will be another Deus Ex game or not. However, we are tracking your choices and the consequences in Mankind Divided. When you're done, we seal your save game file with everything that you've done and that's gonna give us the option in the future. If we’re lucky enough to work on a sequel, we can use that as a stepping stone for you to come in and continue where you left off. So we have changed our approach to tracking your progress."