[DF] Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order: PS5 vs Xbox Series X/S - Full Next-Gen Release Tested
- Thread starter 3liteDragon
- Start date
- Analysis
DonJuanSchlong
Banned
So gonna be round 2 of a bunch of warriors shitting on each other, relentlessly.
Last edited:
kretos
Banned
Fess
Member
Why the laugh? Nobody would notice any difference what so ever between these versions without looking at a fps graph and pixel counter tool.similar conclusion i guess. Series X got just ahead.
I guess ps5 BC porting tools are not as good.
Is this a new version or the one that is on Gamepass?
the same thing. the game pass version is the native version that just got updatedWhy the laugh? Nobody would notice any difference what so ever between these versions without looking at a fps graph and pixel counter tool.
Is this a new version or the one that is on Gamepass?
DForce
NaughtyDog Defense Force
Do you even watch the videos before commenting?similar conclusion i guess. Series X got just ahead.
I guess ps5 BC porting tools are not as good.
MasterCornholio
Member
Similar findings as VG tech. Both are really close.
MasterCornholio
Member
similar conclusion i guess. Series X got just ahead.
I guess ps5 BC porting tools are not as good.
It's not BC though. What was available before this update was BC and the results were much worse on tbe PS5. This shows how a native version can make a difference.
You can see for yourself what the improvements are.
Last edited:
Fess
Member
Cool I'll give it another try then
ethomaz
Banned
Article for these that like to read.
www.eurogamer.net
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order's enhanced PS5/Xbox Series patch - all upgrades tested
It's a credit to the talents and abilities of game developers that so many last-gen games still hold up today - so why …
www.eurogamer.net
Heisenberg007
Gold Journalism
Digital Foundry continues to create poor-quality content.
So Tom uses this cutscene to compare GPU-related performance. He also acknowledges (see captions) that this cutscene is GPU-heavy, and PS5 version doesn't lose frame rates as the PS4 version did.
Then he doesn't use the same cutscene on either Xbox Series X or Xbox Series S. Similarly, the scenes he tests the Series consoles on, he does not show/test on PS5. Absolute low-quality content. I thought these were supposed to be side-by-side comparisons, as the title suggests "PS5 vs. Xbox Series X/S".
Also, doesn't cover the loading time for respawning, I think, which is crucial for these souls-type games.
So Tom uses this cutscene to compare GPU-related performance. He also acknowledges (see captions) that this cutscene is GPU-heavy, and PS5 version doesn't lose frame rates as the PS4 version did.
Then he doesn't use the same cutscene on either Xbox Series X or Xbox Series S. Similarly, the scenes he tests the Series consoles on, he does not show/test on PS5. Absolute low-quality content. I thought these were supposed to be side-by-side comparisons, as the title suggests "PS5 vs. Xbox Series X/S".
Also, doesn't cover the loading time for respawning, I think, which is crucial for these souls-type games.
Last edited:
MasterCornholio
Member
Well they are native versions so they have access to the additional features that the hardware provides. My guess is that they were built for the previous consoles but the code was never fully updated to take full advantage of the current gen systems.
It's better than BC for sure but doesn't equal a game built for these systems. Now I'm not sure how much more they can improve it though.
MasterCornholio
Member
Digital Foundry continues to create poor-quality content.
So Tom uses this cutscene to compare GPU-related performance. He also acknowledges (see captions) that this cutscene is GPU-heavy, and PS5 version doesn't lose frame rates as the PS4 version did.
Then he doesn't use the same cutscene on either Xbox Series X or Xbox Series S. Similarly, the scenes he tests the Series consoles on, he does not show/test on PS5. Absolute low-quality content. I thought these were supposed to be side-by-side comparisons, as the title suggests "PS5 vs. Xbox Series X/S".
Also, doesn't cover the loading time for respawning, I think, which is crucial for these souls-type games.
The best comparisons are like for like on my opinion. It could just be an oversight.
Tripolygon
Banned
Probably just simply wasn't worth covering those particular scenes like for like as they are identical in performance. And this is a last gen game that received very little in the form of upgrade, PS5 was just being updated to reach what XSX had prior to the patch. It's not really worth the time spent going into detail compared to titles like FFVII that received major upgrade.
Last edited:
Bernd Lauert
Banned
And I mean another thread. It's a draw.
Heisenberg007
Gold Journalism
That wasn't just one instance. As I said in my post, they also didn't show the scenes on PS5 that they showed on XSX. We couldn't really see or judge like-for-like performance and image quality on either console because they just hardly showed anything. The first 4 minutes of the video is also just filler content.
Could be an oversight, but they structured this entire video in a weird way. It's just low-quality content for me at this stage. And it's a shame because DF is the leading source for so many gamers, including me. I hope they up their game and stop producing these low-quality, low-effort videos.
By poor content I assume you mean not enough bait for warriors?Digital Foundry continues to create poor-quality content.
So Tom uses this cutscene to compare GPU-related performance. He also acknowledges (see captions) that this cutscene is GPU-heavy, and PS5 version doesn't lose frame rates as the PS4 version did.
Then he doesn't use the same cutscene on either Xbox Series X or Xbox Series S. Similarly, the scenes he tests the Series consoles on, he does not show/test on PS5. Absolute low-quality content. I thought these were supposed to be side-by-side comparisons, as the title suggests "PS5 vs. Xbox Series X/S".
Also, doesn't cover the loading time for respawning, I think, which is crucial for these souls-type games.
This was much more in depth than VGTech's it showed the advantage for both XSX over XB1X and PS5 over PS4BC, where the game still stumbles on both consoles and their base specs. Maybe it didn't show the 2 scenes because it didn't likely show any difference.
Cry me a river if it doesn't obsess over minimal drops on a cutscenes or miniscule DRS numbers that aren't even noticable.
Last edited:
Fake
Member
Tom is one of the better there.
Caio
Member
ahahaha that was funny, post of the day
you gave me a big smile after a heavy day.Physiognomonics
Member
Because he doesn't want to show any difference, cause that wouldn't go along with his narrative: "Game performs the same in both machines".Digital Foundry continues to create poor-quality content.
So Tom uses this cutscene to compare GPU-related performance. He also acknowledges (see captions) that this cutscene is GPU-heavy, and PS5 version doesn't lose frame rates as the PS4 version did.
Then he doesn't use the same cutscene on either Xbox Series X or Xbox Series S. Similarly, the scenes he tests the Series consoles on, he does not show/test on PS5. Absolute low-quality content. I thought these were supposed to be side-by-side comparisons, as the title suggests "PS5 vs. Xbox Series X/S".
Also, doesn't cover the loading time for respawning, I think, which is crucial for these souls-type games.
Physiognomonics
Member
You know
E
Elliot
, when I said they purposefully didn't want to show any difference when there was one because of an editorial stance I didn't know VGTech already had run his framerate tools on that same cutscene. Well there it is, and there is a big difference between PS5 and XSX here (guess which machine performs the best). DF are so predictable with their tricks, it's really too easy. I actually think there could be 2 kind of drops on Xbox, I/O (the big 83.3ms stutter) and GPU (the others small drops), but still, XSX does performs worse in that game.
Last edited:
MasterCornholio
Member
It is interesting. I wonder why it did dip in the BC mode though. Maybe the higher clocks didn't come into play?
i understand that the PS5 has an advantage in this one cutscene and I've seen the clips across various channels. Maybe he didnt capture footage of that section on xbox idk. It's a cutscene and hitches like the other IO hitching other than a frame or two, just like PS5.You know E Elliot , when I said they purposefully didn't want to show any difference when there was one because of an editorial stance I didn't know VGTech already had run his framerate tools on that same cutscene. Well there it is, and there is a big difference between PS5 and XSX here (guess which machine performs the best). DF are so predictable with their tricks, it's really too easy. I actually think there could be 2 kind of drops on Xbox, I/O (the big 83.3ms stutter) and GPU (the others small drops), but still, XSX does performs worse in that game.
idgaf enough to get all up in arms. you're fine to have your complaints and opinions about the content DF puts out. it doesn't bother me.
Leyasu
Banned
Playing the cut scene... Almost as bad as photo mode comparisons..You know E Elliot , when I said they purposefully didn't want to show any difference when there was one because of an editorial stance I didn't know VGTech already had run his framerate tools on that same cutscene. Well there it is, and there is a big difference between PS5 and XSX here (guess which machine performs the best). DF are so predictable with their tricks, it's really too easy. I actually think there could be 2 kind of drops on Xbox, I/O (the big 83.3ms stutter) and GPU (the others small drops), but still, XSX does performs worse in that game.
Werewolfgrandma
Banned
Thanks for posting the lowest resolution photo in existence.You know E Elliot , when I said they purposefully didn't want to show any difference when there was one because of an editorial stance I didn't know VGTech already had run his framerate tools on that same cutscene. Well there it is, and there is a big difference between PS5 and XSX here (guess which machine performs the best). DF are so predictable with their tricks, it's really too easy. I actually think there could be 2 kind of drops on Xbox, I/O (the big 83.3ms stutter) and GPU (the others small drops), but still, XSX does performs worse in that game.
IbizaPocholo
NeoGAFs Kent Brockman
Hobbygaming
has been asked to post in 'Grounded' mode.
Dude I was just about to eat